Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ehhm, no they don't.

Money made in USA is fully taxed and paid for.

Money made overseas is kept overseas and that's perfectly legal and even reasonable.

Apple WANTS to move this money to the USA to pay the bills, buy companies, etc. but it doesn't have to and doesn't want to at 40%.

And they are totally right.
No, their offsea account is a shell account. They use this account only to say they earned money there to take advantage of the lower tax rate. It's legal but they are not paying their fair share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Why are people here so ignorant? Yes, its legal what Apple is doing but its plain wrong. We're not Apple lawyers arguing the law, we're citizens who pay our fair share of tax while big companies like Apple can cheat because they're able to buy the government.

It can't be WRONG if the laws allow it. What is FAIR is not quantifiable.
The numbers take care of what must be paid to satisfy the laws.

How difficult is it to understand that corporations only pay what is required.

Moral, fair, save the world mantras do not apply.

Singling out Apple is blindly following the hunt for a political whipping boy. ALL companies do this.

A business is supposed to make money, not worry about countries with messed up tax codes from 1794.
 
It can't be WRONG if the laws allow it. What is FAIR is not quantifiable.
The numbers take care of what must be paid to satisfy the laws.

How difficult is it to understand that corporations only pay what is required.

Moral, fair, save the world mantras do not apply.

Singling out Apple is blindly following the hunt for a political whipping boy. ALL companies do this.

A business is supposed to make money, not worry about countries with messed up tax codes from 1794.
Of course we can say something is wrong despite the laws. You act like we're just machines without the ability to judge.
 
It can't be WRONG if the laws allow it. What is FAIR is not quantifiable.
The numbers take care of what must be paid to satisfy the laws.

How difficult is it to understand that corporations only pay what is required.

Moral, fair, save the world mantras do not apply.

Singling out Apple is blindly following the hunt for a political whipping boy. ALL companies do this.

A business is supposed to make money, not worry about countries with messed up tax codes from 1794.


'It can't be wrong if the laws allow it"? Huh? Whaaa?

"All companies do this" so it's ok. Huh? Whaaa?
 
People keep saying "Avoiding" taxes. I think a better term should be "deferring". I also hear the word "Scheme" being thrown around. It's not really as much a scheme as it is a means. A means that is completely legal. They can't be forced to bring the money back and they are choosing not to at this time.
 
Amazing how many feel entitled to the labors of others. I dare any of you to earn a fortune and then hand over 40% to the Fed when there are tax loopholes that will help you avoid it. It's unreasonable and you'd be daft not to exploit those loopholes. Any of you would do the same.
Guess what made all that profit possible.

If you believe these companies, ESPECIALLY APPLE, were as successful without the government investing into education, infrastructure, subsidies, ..., basically a tabula rasa of a country, then I have to disappoint you.

The government is only taking, never giving, we need small government and the free market will look after itself perfectly, also CEOs think a whole lot more about the general good than politicians (hint: neither of them really are, but latter are at least elected! Even though one could argue about the options presented...) and so on...

Glassed Silver:mac
 
For those of you who feel this way: at what level of taxation would you feel that Apple was being "moral"? Related question: When you take your personal exemption or itemize your deductions to save on your tax bill, are you being immoral?
At least the same rate as regular citizens. Even if you took all the exemptions you can its not going to be even close to the effective rates these companies pay which is often less than 10%. Wouldn't you love to pay less than 10%?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
I'm going to have to side with Apple, Inc. on this one. Why let America TAX apple for all their revenues? Screw that. All those billions will just fill up those snake politician wallets.
Why are you so against American Socialists taxing American corporations and citizens to death? Geez. You must be another one of those "people" who are against the Welfare Entitlement Mentality.

C'mon. It's common knowledge that the Socialists are obligated to over-tax Apple and everyone else so that the government has plenty of cash to dole out to unemployed welfare recipients!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak and ucfgrad93
People keep saying "Avoiding" taxes. I think a better term should be "deferring". I also hear the word "Scheme" being thrown around. It's not really as much a scheme as it is a means. A means that is completely legal. They can't be forced to bring the money back and they are choosing not to at this time.

Right, so in other words, they ARE avoiding taxes....legally, through a scheme that allows them to do so. Glad we cleared that up.
 
The European Commission is a joke. Apple is a company that makes real products that people buy. Why not go after the banksters, hedge fund managers, and other financial parasites who produce nothing of value, ruin people's lives, and see themselves as above the law and paragons of virtue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak and AdonisSMU
I'm bitching, but maybe I'm not the loudest. Not only am I employed, but my wages alone put me in the top 4% of income earners. Add in rental income and per diems, I go into the top 3%. I pay quite a bit in taxes. And, believe it or not, someone can understand how the system works and just think it's wrong.

That said, the US tax system is a total mess and lets way too much go unpaid.



Of course. But it really helps when your friends write the rules. That doesn't mean the rules are right. It also doesn't necessarily mean that the rules are being followed as they were intended, hence the term "loophole".



I'm not sure, but I think I actually agreed with you on something.



True. In my experience, the people who get the angriest when called out on something, are the ones who are the most guilty.



That was pretty damn reprehensible.



I thought of him right away when reading this thread.



Have you been reading this thread...they aren't paying taxes in a lot of the countries they are in. They are using accounting voodoo to move money around to avoid taxes in most locations.



It does if you are lying about some of those deductions.
Sorry but Apple isn't doing anything that any other multinational company isn't doing. The truth is that our tax rules as it relates to money earned overseas suck. Half the country likes tax loopholes. So until there is a consensus Apple is within its rights and within the morality of what people will accept as it relates to taxes.

The European Commission is a joke. Apple is a company that makes real products that people buy. Why not go after the banksters, hedge fund managers, and other financial parasites who produce nothing of value, ruin people's lives, and see themselves as above the law and paragons of virtue.
It's true that they just scrape off the top and literally everyone else is worse off for it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
True. In my experience, the people who get the angriest when called out on something, are the ones who are the most guilty.

Actually, people get angry if they're wrongfully accused and they have strong conviction in what they're saying... It's a natural human emotion. If I kept accusing you of being a thief, trust me, you'll lose your temper too. If you didn't, I'd be convinced that you were guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak and AdonisSMU
Apple avoid Tax in Australia through dodgy loopholes. Of course its legal, but its not the right thing to do. Apple are not the only ones, so hopefully the useless Australian government will close said loopholes, rather than the budget cuts they propose due to the lack of income by tax dodgers such as Apple.

I pay my tax, so Apple (and other companies) should pay their tax, its a simple as that. If they want to operate in a country, then abide by that countries rules. However this is greedy Apple. They refused to recognise Australian consumer law for goodly while, until they got forced into it, so its not surprising they don't really give a damn.
Nope. Apple is a business and is designed to protect shareholder and Apple values. If people want their governments to change the tax structure than they need to vote people in who will change it to the tax structure they like. Most don't even know oil companies just got additional tax breaks in that new budget plan that passed the other day. So unless you stop voting the same people in office every elections politicians will continue to cater to those with the most money even if it's to the detriment of everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
It's perfectly legal for Tim Cook to fire an employee of his for being gay [Edit: in any of 27 US states]. Does that mean he has the right to do so, or the obligation to do so if that would increase Apple's profits?

The job of a lawyer is to decide if something is legal. The job of a citizen in a democratic society is to decide if something is moral and just.
 
Last edited:
Right, so in other words, they ARE avoiding taxes....legally, through a scheme that allows them to do so. Glad we cleared that up.
If it's legal (your admission), then it's not a 'scheme'. It's a legal tactic….. in the exact same way that when Americans donate their old things to a Charity, they are legally entitled to tax write-offs, thus minimizing the tax they are entitled to pay. When the LAW allows citizens to use strategies to have tax write-offs/deductions, they are not scheming. It's clear to me that you and the Morality Police here imply that citizens who use valid legal strategies to lower their taxes owed to the Government are "evil schemers" for using strategies that the IRS clearly allows them. That might mean people who donate their old clunker cars that they don't need any more, or make donations to their Church. I'm sure you consider them "evil schemers" because they were able to avoid paying higher taxes. Never mind that they were actually following the letter of the law.

So in summary, Illegal? Not likely. If what Google, Apple, Starbucks and Facebook etc have done were clearly illegal, they would have been fined and shut down years ago. So let's move on to Immoral.

Immoral? I'll leave that up to the Morality Police such as yourself and similar forums posters. What have you done to make the world a better humanist place this week? I'm sure you've done much more than Apple, hmm?

It's perfectly legal for Tim Cook to fire any employee of his for being gay.

No it's not legal. Not in California. It might be legal if you live in Moscow.


The job of a citizen in a democratic society is to decide if something is moral and just.

And all this time I thought that was Obama's Job.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak and ucfgrad93
LOL. What's immoral is taking 40% of something someone else has earned to pass around to those who haven't contributed anything at all.

Or you could look at it as taking the 40% to fund the court systems that Apple so willingly and frequently access. Or to fund the police department that Apple calls when one of their drunk idiot employees leaves a prototype phone in the bar.

Amazing how many feel entitled to the labors of others. I dare any of you to earn a fortune and then hand over 40% to the Fed when there are tax loopholes that will help you avoid it. It's unreasonable and you'd be daft not to exploit those loopholes. Any of you would do the same.
Does the 40% come before or after Apple takes 30% o
Then dont. Why are you on an Apple fan site again?
Yeah... only groupthink is allowed here!!! If Apple isn't the higher power that you worship you should leave!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
-> Cook described the tax avoidance accusations as total political crap.

-> He added that repatriating the money is not reasonable due to high corporate tax rates.

Those claims contradict each other. Apple is either avoiding tax or it isn't!

Does Apple owe taxes to the US government for money held overseas? No. Therefore they owe no taxes for it and are not avoiding paying taxes. There's no contradiction. Just because there's potentially taxable actions they can take with the money doesn't mean he's avoiding taxes. It's like me saying, "Why are you avoiding spending all the money in your savings? Ah... you're trying to avoid taxes." The logic is bordering on silly.

Now, if they brought it back to the U.S. and then refused to pay taxes, you'd have a point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak and Jax44
No it's not legal. Not in California. It might be legal if you live in Moscow.

You're right, it's not legal in California, just 27 other US states. I imagine Apple has employees in some of those locations. This is of course a derail, but the point is, we judge people and corporations not by what the US Federal Statue says, but according to our moral beliefs. Tim Cook supports taxation and the US government, just not when it applies to his company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
It's also a problem created by the EU and Ireland. No matter how Cook wants to spin this, the simple fact is that Apple has a tax haven in Ireland where supposedly its research is performed. Yet, for some reason, features and updates are always introduced in the US first, and the countries of the EU have to wait.

I like Apple in most regards, but in this regard Tim Cook is really trying it on. Is Apple tax haven legal? Yes. Is it immoral? Yes.

There is no such thing as an immoral and legal tax strategy. There are no "morals" involved in paying your taxes legally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.