Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple is no longer a computer or phone company but a stock manipulation machine and why Tim Cook the Book was selected.
 
Looking back every quarter had a drop in ASP the further you got from a product launch. Q1 2017 had an ASP of $695, Q2 2017 had an iPhone ASP of $655, and Q3 2017 had an iPhone ASP of $606. I don't think you can read too much from the ASP drop because it looks to be a normal trend.

Reading too much indeed! The only reason someone would be looking at this would be to find anything that is "going down" - searching for a morsel of negativity on the stock.

It does not take calculus or an economics degree to analyze Apple stock. It can be done using very simple methods such as comparison of fundamentals, and even by simply visiting a local "Apple Store" if there is one in your town and observing whether or not the place is full of people.

I have been trying to decode Apple haters for years and years. It's just a certain personality who feels something in their hearts when they say "I would never own an Apple Product, and I am Proud of it" - I have a cousin who tells me this. There are just some people who will swear off Apple products like WWII veteran would never drive a Japanese car. It's like that kind of thing. I find it strange, but the hate exists, and there are those fans who will try to perpetuate any negative thing they hear. Not based on logic, or even profit making - just something dark inside their hearts.
 
Here's a hypothetical sales distribution: SE-10%, 6S-10% , 6S+-10%, 7-12%, 7S-12%, 8-15%, 8+-15%, X-16%,
total -100%. The X outsold every other model, yet outsells no model by more than 6% and overall captures only 1/6 of the sales. Yet it would be a factual basis for Cook's comment about the X outselling all other models. Not that I wouldn't love to have an X, it just shows how if you dig around in the numbers enough you may come up with something positive in a gloomy set of data, so just because something is presented as a great thing, it should be examined closely.

Except there is no evidence of a gloomy set of data. None at all. ASPs are good, volume is good, profit is good. They sold a ton of X's.
 
I'm really surprised the press doesn't catch on to what the financial prognosticators continue to do with Apple claims, as they work to manipulate the share price and/or brand value. It's so obvious, the fact that they're simply throwing out negative stories, when they're almost entirely without merit should be an embarrassment to these guys. But I think they've gotten away with it for so long, without punishment, that they're just going to keep doing it.

Well, perhaps that is how the game is played. For example - let's say you are a fund manager, and your goal is to match the S&P 500 +1%. That's all most of them have to do. My cousin was a fund manager for a multi Billion dollar retirement fund for a big big paper company years ago.

You miss out on something obvious like AAPL stock, so you participate in an orchestrated propaganda smear campaign. Probably a lot of people get yellow envelopes under the table to say this or say that, and likely there are enough haters out there who can spread the negative words without even being aware that they are part of the smear campaign.

You knock AAPL down and it bounces back, and do it again and it bounces back.

I suppose if you are part of the group orchestrating the dips, you can strategically buy them. Apple has probably been very very good to some traders, and the game continues. Trump will fart and the market will drop 400 points for 2 days.

I mean, how low does anyone think AAPL stock can go really? You have $100 BILLION waiting to buy the dips. Does ANYONE think there is another stock that is a safer investment than AAPL?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mizvalorie
I agree. Extensive R&D only results in incremental advancement, not radical change. That's why R&D is more suitable for engineering and biotech field. Building a product has nothing to with R&D, it has to do with the mindset. How many PhD holders have come up with new products that have blown our mind? As far as I know, none! Look around and you will notice that all the radical product designs have come from people who are not deep into research!

So Apple investing 100B into stock buyback is more worthwhile than investing into R&D. The bad feeling I am having is that the success factor of Apple may become the death facotr of Apple. When Apple turns into Microsoft, we already know it's own death spiral.
[doublepost=1525274315][/doublepost]
Genuinely interested to know which carrier and what type of rebates you got. I am in the market to buy 3 phones for my family. Please message me or reply here.

Check this out ... deal runs at Costco through May 03, AT&T only, new line activation required.

https://slickdeals.net/f/11543507-c...bill-credit-300-costco-cash-card-may-1-3rd-50
 
My guess . with the 2018 release of the iPhone Xs, the current iPhone X will disappear entirely from the line-up just like the iPad Pro 9.7 did.
 
Of course Tim isn't going to point out the bad points. His job is to pump the stock as much as possible while still being sure not to tell any lies.

I don't think the iPhone X is selling anywhere near as well as Apple thought it would. Total unit sales are stagnant for a fourth year and are on track to be 15 million less than the highest year back in FY15. ASP would indicate the X made up around 25% of Q1 sales and 20% of Q2 sales. That is a total of around 30 million units, and if trends continue it would look like they will struggle to sell 45 million units for the entire year.

This year's mix of devices was very disappointing. I do believe Apple knew the appeal of a $1,000 device was going to be very limited and as a result carried over the outdated design of the original iPhone 6 into a fourth generation.

Maybe Apple will offer a modern design phone in the $600 - $700 price range next year that will have mass-market appeal and reverse the market share stagnation.
What are you basing this comment on?
[doublepost=1525283383][/doublepost]
Why does it bother people so much that the X is a success?
I don’t know but it’s amusing to see people call Tim Cook a crook, liar and someone who’s cooking the books and manipulating the stock...all because they can’t stand the fact that the X is actually popular.
[doublepost=1525283925][/doublepost]
Clever wording by the CEO. Of course the iPhone X was the most popular iPhone because he treats the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus as two separate products entirely.

But if you compare iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus combined sales against the iPhone X then the iPhone 8 "platform" wins handily. That is what all the analysts have been saying.

Heck some of them even said iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus sales combined were outselling the iPhone X and we have no indication that's not true either.

App developers with very large install bases are also saying the same thing, 8 and 8+ combined are outselling the iPhone X quite considerably but neither model on its own beats the iPhone X.
So the combined sales of two phones are greater than the sales of one phone? Shocking! I’m not sure how you’re defining platform here. Why would the 8 be a different platform than the 7? Both have Touch ID and use the same navigation/gestures. Also how many people chose an 8 Plus because of the bigger screen real estate? How many would have purchased an X Plus if Apple sold one?
 
Oh come on, give it a rest with the throttling already.

Cook's the one that literally pretty much claimed the phone would be good for the next decade...that's akin to Apple's old "magical" line of phraseology. I'm just pointing out (like the guy I was responding to) that it doesn't work like that.
 
Yeah as long as it is a pick up game against your classmates at lunch.

Yeah it's a winner.

15% of smartphones sold are from Apple.

Process that for a minute.

In an industry that they invented and had a multi-year head start on.

That's not a superbowl win.

That's a participation trophy.
 
Are we supposed to be happy now for a company that keeps getting our money every year for a new iPhone?

Sort of funny that every quarter there are record profits (money that comes out of the pockets of their customers), and people don't mind that, but mention paying taxes (income or sales) and people do everything they can NOT to pay them (cheat, shop out of state, etc.).

It's sort of weird how people WANT Apple to take more of their money.
 
Yeah as long as it is a pick up game against your classmates at lunch.

Yeah it's a winner.

15% of smartphones sold are from Apple.

Process that for a minute.

In an industry that they invented and had a multi-year head start on.

That's not a superbowl win.

That's a participation trophy.

Yet the iPhone sells the most of any smartphone and Apple makes the majority of the profits in the smartphone industry. Hell of a participation trophy.
 
The same way it seems to bother more people that it’s not a success.

Now we just need to agree on what success means.

The only thing that bothers me is when people take facts (like the record iPhone quarter that they just had and the X being the top seller through the last two quarters) and somehow try to say it isn't a success. It just doesn't make any sense. If people feel better about themselves for trying to paint a negative picture, go for it, but I'll never understand it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mizvalorie
Yet the iPhone sells the most of any smartphone and Apple makes the majority of the profits in the smartphone industry. Hell of a participation trophy.
LOL such nonsensical comparison that Apple shareholders cling to SO hard.

Breaking down non-iOS sales by vendor is completely artificial and utterly misrepresents the market.

APPLE SELLS A SMALL NUMBER OF THE SMARTPHONES IN THE WORLD.

Do not be confused. They are a minority player.

Just because you see an iPhone in every hand in southern california, it does not mean that the iPhone is popular.

Did I just blow your mind?

15%. Say it with me.

15% of smartphones sold are made by Apple.
 
LOL such nonsensical comparison that Apple shareholders cling to SO hard.

Breaking down non-iOS sales by vendor is completely artificial and utterly misrepresents the market.

APPLE SELLS A SMALL NUMBER OF THE SMARTPHONES IN THE WORLD.

Do not be confused. They are a minority player.

Just because you see an iPhone in every hand in southern california, it does not mean that the iPhone is popular.

Did I just blow your mind?

15%. Say it with me.

15% of smartphones sold are made by Apple.

Haha, you seem very upset about this topic so probably best just to move on. If you want to group together a bunch random free/low end smartphones and claim they make a big impact on the smartphone market, so be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mizvalorie
Haha, you seem very upset about this topic so probably best just to move on. If you want to group together a bunch random free/low end smartphones and claim they make a big impact on the smartphone market, so be it.
I'm pretty upset.

I don't like the new direction of Apple and I don't like being lied to.

People making believe that Apple is a dominant player in the smartphone market, despite the presence of clear statistics to the contrary, are lying.

when-someone-lies-to-you-its-because-they-dont-respect-27540183.png


There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Apple uses statistics.

Apple started with a dominant position in a market they INVENTED and squandered it.

Here they are barely eking out a double-digit share of unit sales while the world becomes saturated by non-iOS smartphones.

Yet Apple marketing collateral (and forum groupies) insist that everything is going just great!

Making the most money at something does not make you the best at it, or the most likely to succeed.

In technology, you go by ADOPTION. And the world is adopting Android a billion at a time.

That, friends, is a fail.
 
I'm pretty upset.

I don't like the new direction of Apple and I don't like being lied to.

People making believe that Apple is a dominant player in the smartphone market, despite the presence of clear statistics to the contrary, are lying.

when-someone-lies-to-you-its-because-they-dont-respect-27540183.png


There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Apple uses statistics.

Apple started with a dominant position in a market they INVENTED and squandered it.

Here they are barely eking out a double-digit share of unit sales while the world becomes saturated by non-iOS smartphones.

Yet Apple marketing collateral (and forum groupies) insist that everything is going just great!

Making the most money at something does not make you the best at it, or the most likely to succeed.

In technology, you go by ADOPTION. And the world is adopting Android a billion at a time.

That, friends, is a fail.

I wouldn't get that worked up about it personally, but I respect your opinion. I just can't sit here and agree that owning a market share full of cheap free buy one get one phones for the sole purpose of advertising is something to be proud of. If you aren't happy with the direction of Apple, walk into any carriers store and ask for a free phone, you'll have your Android in minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mizvalorie
Make the notch smaller, remove that little turd at the bottom of the screen (or have a toggle option in the settings) and you got a winner! For me at least...
 
  • Like
Reactions: -BigMac-
Sort of funny that every quarter there are record profits (money that comes out of the pockets of their customers), and people don't mind that, but mention paying taxes (income or sales) and people do everything they can NOT to pay them (cheat, shop out of state, etc.).

It's sort of weird how people WANT Apple to take more of their money.
Exactly, and when countered with facts their argument is that "nobody forces you to buy it".
 
Yeah as long as it is a pick up game against your classmates at lunch.

Yeah it's a winner.

15% of smartphones sold are from Apple.

Process that for a minute.

In an industry that they invented and had a multi-year head start on.

That's not a superbowl win.

That's a participation trophy.
Market share is the means. Profit is the end.

I ask you the same question I pose to every critic here. Would you as a smartphone company prefer Apple’s profits or Android’s market share?

Apple is winning on all the metrics which matter to them.
 
Market share is the means. Profit is the end.

I ask you the same question I pose to every critic here. Would you as a smartphone company prefer Apple’s profits or Android’s market share?

Apple is winning on all the metrics which matter to them.
Market share every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Market share speaks to trajectory.

I would rather be the company taking over the market with my ecosystem than the company languishing in the corner not selling too many phones (true story look it up -- only 15% of smartphones sold come from Apple).

Net profit paradoxically correlates to poor positioning when it comes to technology companies.

If they are making a tonne of gross profit and not reinvesting it, they are usually milking old ideas.

Which is exactly what we've got here.

Bad scene man. It's a bad scene.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.