You may be right with regard to the ‘phone’ portion of the device. But, as many only use it for calls maybe a few times per day, it’s actually the data communications, sensors, and computing capabilities that are the most important features to the buyer.Personally I’m quite indifferent towards this rumour. I don’t think I used any AR capabilities of my phone :/
I’m really thinking we’ve reached a plateau in smartphone development![]()
To get the best of the best, you're spending more money. You could always save yourself some money by getting older phones, that hasn't changed. What's changed is Apple's premium phone costs $1,000, while it used to cost $600 - 700 to get the latest and greatest. Definitely a reason to complain if you're one to complain.If only Apple still sold phones under $1,000, that would be awesome!
- iPhone SE: $349 - $449
- iPhone 6s: $449 - $649
- iPhone 7: $549 - $769
- iPhone 8: $699 - $949
- iPhone X: $999 - $1,149
You can get a new iPhone from Apple starting at $349, a budget price for a very capable smartphone. Or work your way up and pay more, and receive more speed and features. Pay $999/$1,149 and receive the most speed and features. You don't have to buy the $1,000 phone, but since the X came out, the public's perception is "WTF, iPhones now cost over $1k, this is ridiculous, way too expensive!!"
In fact, iPhones are cheaper than they ever have been.
I like having the phone more 3D like. If it was completely flat, it will totally look and feel like a brick.How about working on getting rid of the protrusion?
The 8 is the current flagship and the X is the luxury/test model.
Wow. The concept is awesome. I might prefer this over a new DSLR for portability.
"The iPhone 9: $699! The iPhone XS: $999! and now ... The iPhone X2: $1499!"
This is getting comical with the camera lenses... if you're so into photography, do yourself a favor and buy a real DSLR camera. Let's keep innovating the smartphone in other areas, the camera has received enough attention already.
EDIT: oh, and hardly anyone is using or wants to use AR... it's a lot to bet on an unproven technology. AR could easily go the way of 3D movies. Don't mean to upset all the Pokeman Go players but...
I have tried using the AR apps from time to time, but there just isn't a real need for it yet.Personally I’m quite indifferent towards this rumour. I don’t think I used any AR capabilities of my phone :/
I’m really thinking we’ve reached a plateau in smartphone development![]()
I wonder if we’ll ever reach this on phones:
![]()
https://light.co/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMImaKC0P2o2wIVxlqGCh3OkQ7oEAAYASAAEgK51fD_BwE
Does anyone else feel like this is building up to be a Saturday Night Live sketch. Like with the razors. Now they have 3 lenses. Now they have 4. Introducing the 37 lens Iphone. lol
My neice went from iOS to Android. She really loves her Moto and Moto mods, the camera and boom stereo speaker. I must admit I enjoyed them when I toyed with the it. Apple should look seriously at that. I can't get rid of my phone cause I love having HiFi DAC.I have the ONLY working (Motion Photography) Dual Camera / Portrait Mode feature in one of my apps, & it clearly illustrates how tough it is to "align the camera to photo subjects" ... & by that I mean, relying-upon the existing Apple Frameworks.
I personally believe Attachment Cameras (w/o their inherent size / lens restrictions) may be the much smarter way to go, even for Apple.
To get the best of the best, you're spending more money. You could always save yourself some money by getting older phones, that hasn't changed. What's changed is Apple's premium phone costs $1,000, while it used to cost $600 - 700 to get the latest and greatest. Definitely a reason to complain if you're one to complain.
Forget about the triple-lens and offer the phones for less than $1000 again. My view.