You have to step back and see how pampered we've become. Whining how a miracle of technology isn't instantly in our possession while some people are wondering where their next meal is coming from.
Bro, we were all clambering for animoji's don't you know? Without those, it might as well be a paperweight.So get this, the design model that should of been the choice for ALL the iPhones this year is delayed due to a "feature" literally no one wanted or asked for.
LOL
You have to step back and see how pampered we've become. Whining how a miracle of technology isn't instantly in our possession while some people are wondering where their next meal is coming from.
His point was that people are asking Apple to spend money on something that money cannot buy.What does Samsung have to do with the true depth camera?
But they definitely wouldn't have positioned Face ID as the "future" if they felt like it was only a temporary solution.Well obviously they're not going to admit if they totally screwed up. We won't know the real story for years.
Fiscal year.1H18F - 1H18 is first half 2018. What does the 'F' mean?
This thing is going to be delayed till end of November by the looks of it.
without questionDo you think NASA and DARPA have better engineers than Apple or Google?
doesn't apple have like $200 billion in the bank? like jesus christ buy some factories, companies, or whatever to get production what it needs to be smh
Damn English system. The English don't even use it!Don’t be lauding NASA, DARPA and such too much. They can’t get difference between metric and English conversions. Had some spectacular failures using wrong measurements.
The more I think about this logic the more I don't believe it. If they wanted to keep touch ID they could have put in in the back for the time being then introduce the ID under the screen as a huge new feature. I believe that their intent is to make Face ID the norm.
I'm not the least bit surprised. FaceID is an incredibly complex system with numerous subsystems that all need to work precisely, flawlessly communicating with each other for it to work perfectly every time.
As far as I can tell, no one has done secure face recognition like this before.
No, but we're guaranteed money coming into Apple constantly without end. When you buy outright, Apple can't know whether you're the person who upgrades every four years or every year. With us, they know they have us under their thumb for constant payments and therefore wants to keep us happily making payments. We also pay for AppleCare as part of the monthly fee. We're the ideal. Apple wants continuous iPhone Upgrades with AppleCare. It's why companies like Adobe have switched to a subscription model. It's more lucrative. It doesn't matter if you think you're more loyal to Apple, what Apple sees is constant stream of income from a group of people it wants to keep happy. However, I do think it would be nice if Apple could identify users who upgrade every single year and make sure they receive stock ahead of other users. You are loyal, but currently there's no way to really know because you're not grouped together with people who always upgrade. Have I made that distinction clear? It's kinda tricky to explain. I was just like you before this program came out.Most loyal? Based on signing a payment plan agreement? C’mon. Silly. Some of us here have been using Apple products since, even before maybe, Apple was born. Some of us just like buying outright vs financing. Does that make us less loyal? But why even pretend Apple owes us anything for buying their products other than the product we bought in working condition and upholding its warranty for that product?
Means in 2 years when the number 10 would have came up they might have a refined product.The 'X' does mean 10 and not 'don't get this iPhone', right?
Nope!
Samsung tried that and failed, when they placed fingerprint reader on the back. It made no sense for Samsung to do it and even less sense of Apple to do it.
I kind of like it. They're doing something really new for the first time in a long time. It's exciting, and expensive, but really cool, too. It's going to be a bit of a beta situation for awhile but it looks like they did a good job of it according to the few people who got to try it out.This is risky for Apple and not the norm. To take on new tech that's not fully established with any other manufacturer (normally Apple will drastically improve what's already out there - Retina Screen, TouchID etc etc). Maybe AirPods were an anomaly and/or rushed because of the removal of the headphone jack; but iPhone X seems like its what they set to do with squeezed timelines to push out something very different with the software coming late that pushed production dates so far back that they'd have to delay launch too.
People just need to calm down. It's not a surprise.
This isn’t true. Craig Federighi told John Gruber Touch ID under the display was plan B. Gruber also confirmed the same with Apple engineers who said they’ve been working on Face iD for over a year.
Something must have happened where they decided later than normal that they wanted to do Face ID over Touch ID. The fact that the couldn't get Touch ID underneath the screen forced them to use their backup technology that they may have been planning for future iPhones, but not for the X