Yes if Apple plans to introduce 3 cores as against existing quad core graphics. You are welcome to correct my stupidity.
they would then introduce a modified A6 chip
Yes if Apple plans to introduce 3 cores as against existing quad core graphics. You are welcome to correct my stupidity.
Yes if Apple plans to introduce 3 cores as against existing quad core graphics. You are welcome to correct my stupidity.
And this is why competition is needed. There's no doubt Apple is very aware of what is about to be unleashed on this world. Windows 8 and Windows RT tablets. They love using the word ecosystem. Will MS already has a massive majority of the world on their OS, now to give them the tablet and phone to complete the ecosystem is Apple's worst nightmare. Many Apple blind followers will easily dismiss MS, but Apple being in the business, knows better.
I do hope that this isn't the case.
As I just bought my iPad last month! I waited until they announced the iPhone 5 just in case if they mentioned anything about newer internals.
As they didn't, I decided to take the plunge. I so hope that they don't update. If they do, i'll be going to the Apple store and talking to the Manager.
HW
Thats exact reason I rushed in getting another one of the current mode for my wife. With retina screen you definitely need good processing and the moment I saw A6 getting upgraded(rather downgraded IMO ) I wanted to get one immediately before it goes out of stock.
It's the way Apple presented previous generations and then changed the naming scheme (for the better) from numbers to a unified name. Imagine if they did that with the iPhone? MacBooks and iMacs were never numbered, and I think they should just drop the numbering from their hardware entirely.
After ebay and PayPal costs? Or before?
I also bought one a month ago. Why would I go back to the store and bother the manager because there's an updated one out? It's not like I've been misled. If you buy a hi-tech product that's been out for 6 months you should know it's not going to be the latest model for very long. What would you say?I do hope that this isn't the case.
As I just bought my iPad last month! I waited until they announced the iPhone 5 just in case if they mentioned anything about newer internals.
As they didn't, I decided to take the plunge. I so hope that they don't update. If they do, i'll be going to the Apple store and talking to the Manager.
HW
I dunno... I think they've scheduled the release pattern so that there will never be long periods of silence from Apple. iPad in March, iPhone in July, iPods in September. I think the reason why they're apparently preparing to carpet bomb the market with new products next week (iPad Mini, tweaked iPad 3, iMac, Mac Mini, MBP 13") is that Windows 8 and Surface are coming out and Apple wants to steal some thunder.What I think is going to happen from now is that Apple will release new iPad versions before christmans and not AFTER. Which I belive have sense.
So iPhones and iPads release time will be similar.
And obviously they could not expect to sell iPads with the old connection during all the christmas....
Explain to me again why nobody thinks this "refresh" is actually the iPad 4? If you think about it releaseing the iPad 4 now makes a hell of a lot more sense then a refresh.
And I *just* bought a new iPad... grrr.
Does your current model fulfill all your needs? Probably. Will the newer iPad have features that you must have right now? Doubtful. But let me guess, you will pay premium price again because your current model is "out dated". And six months from now you will be posting the same complaints again when a newer model is released. Talk about the ultimate slave to consumerism.
If you can't see the value in a $500 tablet then there is nothing more that will convince you otherwise. It shouldn't matter when the product gets updated because it will eventually be updated at some point in time. Just stick with what you have that works well for you instead of trying to "keep up with the Jones'" I understand the nature of wanting the best perceived value but that idea doesn't work very well for tech products.
obsolete. do you even know what the word means?
Why would I want a full size iPad today with an outdated connector when I know the next iPad will have the new one? Once the connector is updated I will buy that iPad.
Read what people post, have the intelligence to see the point being made, then reply. If you are incapable of such actions, do not waste your time or mine quoting and replying to me.
Switching to lightning connector makes sense in the iPad, that way their whole (most) mobile line can switch to lightning in the same year. Improved interior would be nice, does it still over heat with the retina display?
I cannot explain why nobody thinks this refresh is actually an iPad 4. That would be like explaining why nobody thinks that the earth is an oblate spheroid.
Most people have done that with their posts, and it's what I'm doing now:
At the point of sale, you should be deciding whether what you are buying is worth the money you are exchanging for it, even with the possibility that newer products can come out tomorrow or in ten years.
If you feel that newer iPads, on their current release schedule, damage the value of your previous purchase so badly, the obligation is on you to not buy those products (since their value is so precarious), not on Apple to stop selling. Just because you feel bad doesn't mean Apple is doing anything wrong.
Appeals to 'premium price' don't hold any water because 'premium price' is subjective. Apple never said "If you pay this price, which we have presented as a premium price, then we will delay product releases as you see fit". It's a silly inference to make.
Appeals to 'true lifecycle' don't get you anywhere either. How do you know what the 'true' lifecycle is (as opposed to a 'false' lifecycle)? How does the new release change what you bought?
Why is £649 a price which entitles you to your grievance and $500 isn't? At which price does it flip from 'normal price' to 'premium price'?
At the point of sale, you should be deciding whether what you are buying is worth the money you are exchanging for it, even with the possibility that newer products can come out tomorrow or in ten years.
If you feel that newer iPads, on their current release schedule, damage the value of your previous purchase so badly, the obligation is on you to not buy those products (since their value is so precarious), not on Apple to stop selling. Just because you feel bad doesn't mean Apple is doing anything wrong.
Appeals to 'premium price' don't hold any water because 'premium price' is subjective. Apple never said "If you pay this price, which we have presented as a premium price, then we will delay product releases as you see fit". It's a silly inference to make.
I have the "iPad 3", and really I do not give two hoots if the iPad gets a refresh next week. I purchased this iPad on launch day so have had close on 8 months of use before a revised one hits the stores. The processor and GPU are plenty powerful enough for a tablet (for power I have an i7 iMac) and this will be fine for my needs for the next couple of years.
People need to stop fretting about this refresh, which I suspect will be the lightning connector and 4G only with an outside chance of Sharp display and improvement of battery. Technology moves on but actually having the fastest processor etc. is not why people buy Apple products - most users really don't care. People are buying into the Apple Eco system, OS, ease of use, huge library of Apps etc.
This whole sense of perceived betrayal that some have that their iPad is not the latest one for a full 12 months is quite frankly rather bizarre.
Wrong. When Apple launches a new product, they make it clear that this is the best product they can design and build.
Obviously they lied to us - it was possible to build an iPad 3 that was LTE-capable in the UK, with the new dock connector and even the newer processor. Things like the IGZO screen don't really change the specs of the product, and nobody has a problem with them improving in that way.
What about that new dock connector, though? How about if some really cool lightning-only accessories come out next year? Our 7-month old iPads would be obsoleted out of support. That's unacceptable. Full stop.
No matter what kind of twisted rationale you come up with, plenty of us who bought an iPad 3 are feeling hard-done by. Either we've all got emotional disorders, or we're rightly feeling that the value Apple proposed to us was a cynical half-truth.
It's going to hurt their relationship with their customers (like me).
I bought a device expecting it to be the focus of developer attention on the iPad platform for 12 months. As an avid iOS gamer, I was looking forward to the top titles but if an A6 enabled iPad 3 comes next week so soon in the new iPad lifecycle, my device is going to become obsolete pretty quick in terms of pushing top games.
Yes, it does what I paid for it to do six months ago. I expected to get 12 months of "top device" developer support via apps, but my device is being superseded far, far too soon if it does indeed get replaced by a new higher spec iPad so soon into its lifecycle.
When Apple launches a new product, they make it clear that this is the best product they can design and build.
What about that new dock connector, though? How about if some really cool lightning-only accessories come out next year? Our 7-month old iPads would be obsoleted out of support. That's unacceptable. Full stop.
No matter what kind of twisted rationale you come up with, plenty of us who bought an iPad 3 are feeling hard-done by. Either we've all got emotional disorders, or we're rightly feeling that the value Apple proposed to us was a cynical half-truth.