If someone gets a Windows laptop because Apple hasn't updated the MBPr yet, this someone doesn't really need a Mac.
![]()
Technically no one needs a Mac
If someone gets a Windows laptop because Apple hasn't updated the MBPr yet, this someone doesn't really need a Mac.
![]()
A third possibility--and one that's a lot less fun for us users--is that they simply haven't been able to get the battery life where they want it, despite Haswell, and have had to expend some serious development effort on that.
We should have a bet on how many pages this thread is going to have until they release those new shiny rMBP![]()
The majority of people don't really need a Mac.![]()
Well this is pretty disappointing. Now I'm wondering if I should just buy the current rMBP and be done with it. I need more battery life though. I'm outside all day without barely any power sources to use. Ah well. If I could get a nice 16GB/512 refurbished I guess I'll be pretty happy with that.
Technically no one needs a Mac
I envy you mac owners.
He was referring to October for Q3 earning call, not products
https://www.macrumors.com/2012/05/1...pro-and-imac-models-showing-up-in-benchmarks/
nope, 10.8 in May 2012. and July 2012 release.
Heck, some people say all television is more "want" than "need."
On point, those old enough may recall the old "I want my MTV" commercials on cable.
Wanting an up-to-date mac is not only a matter of "need," IMHO.
From a business sense, the lack of updates makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I say that as someone with an MBA and expertise in operations. I also say that with an external (i.e., outsider's) view, meaning that I recognize I'm not privy to what's going on behind closed doors. Nevertheless, with all those caveats in mind, I would have bet strongly on seeing an update either to the MBP line or to the iMac line before September. You can re-read my rationale (based on the accounting numbers involved before today's call) here:
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/17607707/
The fact that we're seeing neither tells me that something else is going on. The top guesses would be an issue with the supply chain, or a more dramatic move than the drop-in CPU+GPU changes we were expecting. If it's the latter, that might be good news for folks who are waiting.
A third possibility--and one that's a lot less fun for us users--is that they simply haven't been able to get the battery life where they want it, despite Haswell, and have had to expend some serious development effort on that.
I still contend that a lot of the theories espoused in this thread--that Apple is waiting to release the new models with Mavericks, or waiting on Thunderbolt 2, or waiting for the Back to School promotion to end--are, in a word, garbage. They might sound good at first, but if you step back and consider them from a business sense--i.e., the perspective of someone who crunches the numbers--none of those are reasonable explanations in the slightest. The reasons have been already articulated by myself and others in this thread.
That said, there are two other rays of hope in all of this.
- People who need a computer for going back to school, or for other reasons in the weeks ahead, can now stop consternating and purchase one. The refurbished 2012 models continue to offer an excellent value for the money, and are likely to hold their resale value pretty well should you want to trade up in the months ahead.
- For those of us have owned a lot of Apple stock and had it hammered, I guess I'm glad to have it up a few percent after hours. It's a small consolation, but hey, what are you gonna do?
When I see this current battery lives of MBPs, I realize how in the dark I am. My Dell Studio 1640 used to have a battery life of slightly over 2hrs - on a good day. It's been plugged in since 7:30AM today and it's about 5pm. I just unplugged it and it's only 70% charged with 1hr 10minutes left of juice. LOL
A battery life of 4 hours means I can actually fly Chicago to Dallas without the extra weight and cords in my laptop bag.
I envy you mac owners.
Nope, wrong.
Oh wait, you're right, we only need food, water, and a little shelter.
![]()
not sure were Tim is going with this but its not a good business plan
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Apple has never announced imminent releases at investor conferences. The iMac refresh of 2010, for instance, came a week after the conference and wasn't even mentioned then. They were clearly referring to October as the next investor conference, not product release month. They could very well still release something this week; too early to jump to conclusions.
This line of reasoning makes absolutely no sense.
• You said, "the benchmarks we've seen...have all," but there's been one benchmark that popped up. One. I do not understand how people are contorting that single anecdotal data point into thinking that there can't be a ML build.
• Moreover, we are not talking about official or even sanctioned tests. This is an "oops" event by a person at Apple who should have known better but screwed up by running Geekbench. Why would you think that just because one guy is running a dev build on his laptop that there aren't other configurations/builds/etc. in use?
• 10.8.5 is in beta testing right now. It wouldn't be entirely trivial to be sure it's adapted for new models, but it's also not a massive undertaking. And, keep in mind--that's exactly what Apple did last year with the release of the rMBP. And that was even during a time when supply was seriously constrained.
• Holding back the models for an OS release is just, well, insane from a business perspective. This is a company that is struggling mightily to avoid year-over-year declines in revenue. While supply chain issues are involuntary and cannot be helped, there simply aren't many good reasons to voluntarily delay your flagship, sales-leading product.
I have a 2009 MBP and I only get a little less than 3 hrs out of it. I envy 2010s mac users. There is always someone with a better computer...