Sorry to jump in, but I think the argument on this point was that an iPhone is constantly being used and put away several times an hour, whereas this happens much less frequently with a laptop or desktop. The latter are more typically in use less frequently, but for longer periods of time. In other words, the comment was less about the purchasing ecosystem and more about the simple act of locking/unlocking the device.
You're welcome to jump in.
🙂
I could stipulate that that the majority of iOS users would use their Touch ID validation more frequently. OTOH, if/when App Store and other purchases were available through this [hypothetical] Mac validation device, some users would definitely use it
very frequently there.
What I can't tell if @zOlid realizes is the potential win in having Touch ID be available on all new AAPL devices in the next 12 months. It becomes a kind of branding; it also becomes a way to encourage long-term Apple users to upgrade to this new tech.
Ultimately, I'm inclined to agree with you: with Touch ID technology in place and working smoothly, it's not hard to, in movie trailer parlance, "imagine a world" in which a fingerprint sensor is built in to virtually every security-reliant electronic device. Seems like a logical progression, like it or not.
Thanks. I'm trying to think of the seminal bits of technology in my life: where one company created a tool that made a huge difference in the world. I think that HP did that back in 1972 with the HP35 (good
Wikipedia article). HP co-founder Bill Hewlett issued a SJ-like challenge to his engineering staff, and they delivered. HP even issued a retro version of the calculator on the 25th anniversary:
Before the HP-35, the only calculators that existed could do addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. HP sold the calculator for $395 (over $2100 adjusted for inflation today), and they wildly exceeded their sales projections.
I don't really think this incremental improvement is comparable to the HP-35, but that machine from history taught a valuable lesson. Unless the HP-35 (and its successors) got the math right, the would have been worthless and a commercial failure. In a similar fashion, unless Touch ID provides atomic validation of fingerprints, it will be worthless for Macs. I don't think that @zOlid realizes the risks of putting Touch ID on a separate keyboard...