The major redesign was June 2012 when Apple introduced the rMBP. I don't get why people think this wasn't a redesign.
No that is, thought the retina was older, yea they wouldn't redesign it after a year and a few months
The major redesign was June 2012 when Apple introduced the rMBP. I don't get why people think this wasn't a redesign.
No that is, thought the retina was older, yea they wouldn't redesign it after a year and a few months
You getting Haswell or Broadwell? My Airs trackpad is very annoying atm, and can't chance to get it fixed just yet![]()
This thread will make it well past 20,000 replies cause it won't be announced on Tuesday...
![]()
I for one will partake in this comment, even though I do participate (only since ~June though - and I'm not even planning on buying Haswell).
I think GSPice's comments were/are great. Guaranteed to be funny 8/10 of the time
I also think that Jon123 guy is awesome. Even though he is the epitome of an overly zealous self-entitled douchebag. He would say something like "I am, indeed, for real. With my top-tier MBA". He'll probably get mad at my comment but I think he's great. Many don't realize that if you ignore the negative effect of what he has to say then you can easily appreciate his precise logic and point of view.
I'd have to say that you, along with PDFierro and KUGuardGirl seem to be some of the best. Then there are those who are pessimistic and bring the whole mood of the thread down.
So what kind of alternate reality do you live in?
Oh 3D + CUDA, and PROfessionals? Oh, really?
need CUDA to render?
What kind of "PRO" 3D package does run on Mac OS and support CUDA?
Guess what, I'm a happy Luxology modo (PRO)user. Modo is probably the only serious "PRO" 3D application on Macs, but there is NO CUDA support.
The only half-successful GPU based 3rd party render engine (in the world) is the "Octane Render", but that's so special and niche that it's completely out of scope for Apple's "PRO" marketing.
---------
I'm so sick and tired of those "PRO" arguments! Clearly, the major target audience for mac books are rich college kids, who buy Mac Books not because they're "PRO" but because they expect "PRESTIGE" on their campus.
Then there is also still a market among the DTP and media professionals because of decade-long "IMAGE inertia" <-go figure
P.S. Adobe Creative Suite (PRO) also runs on "cheap" PCs (less ca$h).
Who loves reading the marketing material on Apple's website? Think I will have to do that as I order.
I could convince myself to buy anything if I read too much of the Apple marketing material.![]()
On a separate note, to all you people who only read this thread and not participate in it, who is your favourite thread contributor here?
Apple released the haswell airs nearly instantly with. Pretty small upgrade, yea the processors lead to way more battery life but still other than that no major changes.
Chances are apple could've simply added haswell to the retina and released it fairly quickly. Yes they could easily just have decided to wait a few months, but I feel as if apple wouldn't take 4 months to release a laptop with the same update that took nearly no time for the air. They must be making some other change. Is it not possible that they're updating the chassis slightly? They haven't updated it for the retina ever have they?
A one where we all drink way too much coffee before the 22nd and as a result of the surge in caffeine and the shock of Apple not releasing the haswell rmbp, we all take to this thread to voice our various opinions in our posts, replete with numerous spelling and grammatical errors. Many arguments would spring up because of the high-tempered members of this thread being spurred on by disappointment and caffeine.
It's possible they will make bigger changes but I wouldn't count on it. There's 3 28W HD 5100 processors suitable for the 13" rMBP and they were all released Q3 '13
http://ark.intel.com/compare/75992,75991,75990
...and 3 of the 4 47W HD 5200 processors for the 15" rMBP were Q3 '13 while one's Q4 '13
http://ark.intel.com/compare/76085,76086,76087,76088
Also true, completely forgot about the 13"'s existence
Eh, I only buy stuff I absolutely need. I'm good at holding back.
Me too. I'll probably miss all the good contributors to this thread, like you, PDFeirro, ValSalva, Mcarling, KUGuardGirl, Johnny large, adjeff, CmdrLaForge, GSPice, VanillaCracker, John123, etc. These conversations are usually very informative and interesting, and when the new rmbp comes out, I'll probably have learned more from this thread than if I never participated or read it at all
I'd have to say that you, along with PDFierro and KUGuardGirl seem to be some of the best. Then there are those who are pessimistic and bring the whole mood of the thread down.
OpenGL performance is much greater on the 6xx/7xx cards than Iris Pro.
Going Iris Pro will drop performance in...
OpenGL performance is much greater on the 6xx/7xx cards than Iris Pro.
Going Iris Pro will drop performance in... oh hell...
1) Xcode (iOS Simulator is a prime suspect)
2) Photoshop CS6 (OpenGL is used MORE than OpenCL. In fact, as far as I know, only 2 features in CS6 actually make use of OpenCL, while a lot rely and require OpenGL)
3) AutoCAD (relies on OpenGL for its 3D engine to render to the screen)
4) Maya (relies on OpenGL for its 3D engine to render to the screen)
5) Solidworks (relies on OpenGL for its 3D engine to render to the screen)
6) AfterEffects CS6 (relies exclusively on CUDA for its ray-tracing engine)
Even if you don't use the machine for rendering, dropping OpenGL performance will cause issues with a lot of applications, and there is no way around it.
For those of us who are expecting decent OpenGL performance from these machines just to display our 3D models in AutoCAD or similar applications, I'm sure the dedicated graphics still have its place.
And unless Apple can somehow make 128MB of SLOWER video RAM equal 1024MB (read: 8 times more) of FASTER video RAM, there is still that memory issue that can't be fixed either way.
This thread will make it well past 20,000 replies cause it won't be announced on Tuesday...
![]()
Anyone find it odd how quiet things are when it comes to the Retina Macbook Pro? No part leaks or anything, unlike the iPad or iPhone.
I completely agree. No matter how you look at it, Intel's Iris Pro is mediocre at best.
thanks alot!!! really help me for decide between the 13'' and the 15''
first year of mechanical engineering
Anyone find it odd how quiet things are when it comes to the Retina Macbook Pro? No part leaks or anything, unlike the iPad or iPhone.
Next year when Broadwell hits, maybe Intel's integrated GPU will show some interesting numbers... provided they can also embed some more video RAM in there for us texture maniacs.
And I'd say... anyone who says more video memory isn't important probably hasn't had to deal with architectural drawings with a lot of textures and details.
Sure, you can drop the amount of visible textures and details down to fit in that 128MB of video RAM, but having 1024MB to play around with does help. And that's not to mention every texture would have to be quite big in resolution either way to take advantage of the Retina display.
Yeah... seriously...
I haven't had much time to go back and discuss this lately, but it just irks me when people start making stuffs up in an attempt to justify the next rMBP having Iris Pro.
There's a reason why the very recent Haswell iMac refresh has Iris Pro only in the lowest-end configuration! And only on the 21.5". The 27" iMac doesn't have an Iris option at all.
Even Apple knows that Iris Pro isn't a viable option for their "non-Pro" computers...