Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Time Capsule - probably 3TB, but might do 2TB.
I purchased a 2TB TC. My thinking is the 2TB will hold me (two MBP's in the house to back up) for at least a couple years. By the time I actually need something bigger, I expect to be able to replace the standard 3.5" HD in the TC with something much larger for something on the order of the $100 price difference between the 2TB and 3TB TC's. This is one of the rare cases where "going big" as a hedge against the future is not, IMO, the best path because HD prices/price per GB continue to drop.
 
I hate to stay this, but it seems like the new MacBook Pros with be purely spec bumps with no real meaningful new features (sure, we can quibble about graphics and battery life). Even Thunderbolt 2 is a "maybe." I know I've been waiting more than a year for this one product, but I find myself looking more and more at other products and platforms...

Isn't everything a maybe?
 
The more I think on that, the more I get convinced that Apple will not drop 128GB SSD as a base option.

In the light of phasing out the cMBP, I think Apple will prefer to stick with a basic configuration at a lower price rather than keeping $1499 with a 256SSD.

- 21h.11m
 
The more I think on that, the more I get convinced that Apple will not drop 128GB SSD as a base option.

In the light of phasing out the cMBP, I think Apple will prefer to stick with a basic configuration at a lower price rather than keeping $1499 with a 256SSD.

Yup. This is what I've always thought. Besides, Apple wouldn't offer 512GB on the high-end base model. So what's the point of offering two base models with the same storage? The only thing separating the two would be a minimal processor difference, or perhaps RAM.
 
There isn't even another choice for me. Unless Apple magically announced a 3rd line of laptops tomorrow.

That's what I thought, but when I started to look around, I realized Apple is no longer a "magic company". Yes, their build quality and materials are unbeatable and the software is the best, but other brands are steadily approaching. I'll probably end up still getting it, but I'm not going to order it on launch day. Surface Pro 2, Samsung Ativ Book 9 Plus, etc make pretty compelling competitors.

----------

Isn't everything a maybe?

No. PCIe SSDs and AC wifi are definite.
 
That's what I thought, but when I started to look around, I realized Apple is no longer a "magic company". Yes, their build quality and materials are unbeatable and the software is the best, but other brands are steadily approaching. I'll probably end up still getting it, but I'm not going to order it on launch day. Surface Pro 2, Samsung Ativ Book 9 Plus, etc make pretty compelling competitors.

----------



No. PCIe SSDs and AC wifi are definite.

No, a magic company they are not. But the rMBP is the best option for me. There's not even a second best option for my uses. Ordering as soon as they are available.
 
I realize that am not speaking from authority here, but I have a theory that might explain why Apple has missed so many of their deadlines for the new Retina Macbook Pro.

Here are the facts:

  1. Consumers are increasingly using tablets and phones for mobile computing, rather than laptops. Apple has certainly noticed this.
  2. Apple is about to release their new Mac Pro, which is designed for professional use. The Macbook Pro is also designed for professional use, so there's a slight bit of overlap.

Here is the theory: Perhaps Apple is working on new portable solutions for the Mac Pro (e.g. straps, etc.), because they've seen the professional laptop market dwindling? The new Mac Pro is very small and very light, and that can't be an accident.

When people are on the go, they use their phones and tablets (iPhones and iPads). When people are in the office, the use their desktops (Mac Pros).

However, what if they're on a business trip in a conference room? Their phone or tablet just won't cut it for their computing needs. In that situation, Apple might have realized that a lightweight, stylish, portable desktop isn't such a bad option.

Thoughts? Again, this is purely speculation.

If this is trolling, it is quite fun trolling at least. Otherwise: "straps" and "Apple" just don't belong together in any sentence.
 
I agree - having a 256gb as the base ssd size is a joke for a pro machine coming out at the end of 2013. Let's hope Apple agrees with this and bumps up the base size.

I think that 256GB SSD as the baseline size is fine for right now and for the next several years. The higher spec model will likely start with 512GB SSD (as presently construed). Given the alternative, I'd much rather have a smaller SSD than a comparably priced fusion/combo drive with spinning platter for a device that is meant to be used on the go. On the new iMacs, the upgrade to 256GB SSD is priced the same as the 1TB Fusion. I would be wary of having only 256GB internal storage on a stationary (and presumably primary machine), but for a mobile device, I would imagine that given the relatively low costs currently of external drives and expanding cloud storage capabilities, that the entry level SSD size will suffice for most.
 
I purchased a 2TB TC. My thinking is the 2TB will hold me (two MBP's in the house to back up) for at least a couple years. By the time I actually need something bigger, I expect to be able to replace the standard 3.5" HD in the TC with something much larger for something on the order of the $100 price difference between the 2TB and 3TB TC's. This is one of the rare cases where "going big" as a hedge against the future is not, IMO, the best path because HD prices/price per GB continue to drop.

That's a very good point because I can purchase a 4TB seagate backup plus for $150. It's probably wiser to go that route and use the TC the way it was intended instead of trying to monkey with it by partitioning.
 
Weight aside... the dominant turn off to me about the MBP is how dark Movies are in Itunes. Is the new graphics card/chip/features likely to increase the brightness of the Haswell MBP?

The (former) prediction re: slimming down the 13" rMBP called for a 1mm reduction in thickness, which would probably shave a couple of grams off the weight.

Unless you're planning on running marathons with your rMBP strapped to your back, this unlikely change in chassis won't do much for you.
 
I realize that am not speaking from authority here, but I have a theory that might explain why Apple has missed so many of their deadlines for the new Retina Macbook Pro.

Here are the facts:

  1. Consumers are increasingly using tablets and phones for mobile computing, rather than laptops. Apple has certainly noticed this.
  2. Apple is about to release their new Mac Pro, which is designed for professional use. The Macbook Pro is also designed for professional use, so there's a slight bit of overlap.

Here is the theory: Perhaps Apple is working on new portable solutions for the Mac Pro (e.g. straps, etc.), because they've seen the professional laptop market dwindling? The new Mac Pro is very small and very light, and that can't be an accident.

When people are on the go, they use their phones and tablets (iPhones and iPads). When people are in the office, the use their desktops (Mac Pros).

However, what if they're on a business trip in a conference room? Their phone or tablet just won't cut it for their computing needs. In that situation, Apple might have realized that a lightweight, stylish, portable desktop isn't such a bad option.

Thoughts? Again, this is purely speculation.

Yea, light enough to fit in your backpack. The strap will be for the monitor.
You're cute ;).
 
Do you think the proposed Haswell MBP will have this?

The (former) prediction re: slimming down the 13" rMBP called for a 1mm reduction in thickness, which would probably shave a couple of grams off the weight.

Unless you're planning on running marathons with your rMBP strapped to your back, this unlikely change in chassis won't do much for you.

Chip won't effect brightness. IGZO is the solution if you find the current retina screen not bright enough.
 
I think that 256GB SSD as the baseline size is fine for right now and for the next several years. The higher spec model will likely start with 512GB SSD (as presently construed). Given the alternative, I'd much rather have a smaller SSD than a comparably priced fusion/combo drive with spinning platter for a device that is meant to be used on the go. On the new iMacs, the upgrade to 256GB SSD is priced the same as the 1TB Fusion. I would be wary of having only 256GB internal storage on a stationary (and presumably primary machine), but for a mobile device, I would imagine that given the relatively low costs currently of external drives and expanding cloud storage capabilities, that the entry level SSD size will suffice for most.

256GB is definitely enough for entry-level. I really don't buy the argument that not offering 512 as standard on a Pro machine is a "joke".
 
Do you think the proposed Haswell MBP will have this?

Have what? Reduction in the chasis from 0.75 to 0.71? Probably. But that won't change much.

The 13-inch rMBP is a completely acceptable form factor where size/weight is concerned for those coming from a 13-inch Air.
 
Do you think the proposed Haswell MBP will have this?
No one here has any idea -- we all find out tomorrow.

There are competitors releasing IGZO screens now, which means it is *possible* Apple may do so, but by no means certain (or even likely).

Broadwell MBP's probably will have IGZO by the time they are released.
 
Look to Monoprice for any adapters or cables. They're way cheaper there and most work just as well as first-party accessories that cost 3-10x as much.

Thank you.

----------

The 2.8GHz not only has 0.1 more GHz, you also get 33% more L3-Cache.

Just saying ;-)

Was? Please explain - although 33% seems like a huge improvement, is this human noticeable?
 
Same here; the flagship store in Regent's street is open until 9pm, I'm wondering if they have will have it in stock tomorrow night. Has anyone asked/does anyone know?

Hi guys, another Londoner here ;)! I've the same questions, I'm planning to get the retina iPad mini first, then the rMBP few days later (hopefully, if I resist the temptation).

How are the timings for London regarding iPads and MacBooks? Is there any London genius listening ;)?
 
Last edited:
Well, the anticipation here is certainly bigger and busier than it was in the day before WWDC and before the iPhone event...

I think so. At WWDC, most of us expected new rMBPs but there was still a big shadow of doubt clouding the event. And the iPhone event, we were all just hoping there. Apple wasn't going to share the spotlight with the iPhones.

Where as this iPad event is the final resting place.
 
You'll definitely be able to get that at the store. Probably the high-end base model. I'm hoping I can receive my BTO 13-inch by the 29th or 30th.

Woot!! I was worried I'd have to wait for a BTO. My current MBP is the base model, so I've never ordered a non-base before.

There already is an standard model 13" with 256 GB SSD. Seems pretty likely that for Haswell there will as well.

I think she is talking about 256 being offered in place of the 128, on the low-end base model. Save some money.

I did mean a Haswell model similar to the current 2.6ghz 13", but if the base capacity is upped to 256gb that would be awesome too! I just didn't mention that to avoid the "It's too expensive for Apple to raise base capacity!!" comments.

Hope my intentions are clear now :)
 
Woot!! I was worried I'd have to wait for a BTO. My current MBP is the base model, so I've never ordered a non-base before.





I did mean a Haswell model similar to the current 2.6ghz 13", but if the base capacity is upped to 256gb that would be awesome too! I just didn't mention that to avoid the "It's too expensive for Apple to raise base capacity!!" comments.

Hope my intentions are clear now :)

I completely understood you the first time. I don't see why there wouldn't be a low-end and high-end base model again. So you'll have no problem picking up a i5 256GB at the store.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.