Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Trust me it is less hot than any 2012/2013 models
Really? My 2012 runs very cool, and the Razer I had easily pushed into 70c under load. What temps are you seeing that indicates it runs cooler then a 2012 laptop? Btw, all of my research has indicated that coffee lake runs hotter then prior generations, so what you post is a bit confusing.
 
Your 2012 is a retina 15" ? i get around 43-44C under load on my base late 2013 15" on the functions keys area
PS: your 2012 does have dGPU? i think thats counts a lot too....i am comparing my 2 Mbp, both with i7 and both with dGPu
i think those 15" that have only iGPu will run cooler...
 
Last edited:
Ordered a 13 inch 2.7GHz, 16GB, 1TB machine Monday afternoon.

Is this spec available to pickup in store yet, or still the basic configurations?

Forgot to mention, in the UK stores
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamA9
Ordered a 13 inch 2.7GHz, 16GB, 1TB machine Monday afternoon.

Is this spec available to pickup in store yet, or still the basic configurations?

Forgot to mention, in the UK stores

Ordered the same spec. Delivery hopefully next week. Nothing in stores in brighton. You might have better luck in London if that’s convinient (not sure where you’re based).
 
I agree, i realised a while back that it doesn't matter what Apple do some people will still complain, people wanted 32GB Ram they now have it, people wanted more SSD storage they now have it, but some are STILL not happy instead they complain about the price. I think what some people forget is that these are Pro machine's they are not general consumer laptops, we are talking people who video edit, photography, coders, scientists, movie makers, hell even writers such as myself who also dabble in video editing (more of a hobby and to help a couple of friends out from time to time), they are not machines that the general consumer needs to buy in order to sit in Starbucks.

As far as i can see the 2018 MacBook Pro update is a great one, Quad Core for the 13" and 6 Core for the 15" along side the T2 chip, True Tone displays and better keyboards which are more quieter (and probably more reliable).

Apple are obviously listening to people and yet some are STILL not HAPPY :rolleyes:

What computer are you using at the moment? Do you feel the need to upgrade?

I am on 2016 MBP 13 with TB, the two bonuses for me are True Tone and larger battery. Quad core and keyboard and sound improvements only mean that I will be happier for longer. In a little dilemma of to upgrade or not! Paid $2300 for it, getting $1200 for it. Ridiculous. Will have to shell $1200 out of pocket again if I choose to upgrade.
 
What computer are you using at the moment? Do you feel the need to upgrade?

I am on 2016 MBP 13 with TB, the two bonuses for me are True Tone and larger battery. Quad core and keyboard and sound improvements only mean that I will be happier for longer. In a little dilemma of to upgrade or not! Paid $2300 for it, getting $1200 for it. Ridiculous. Will have to shell $1200 out of pocket again if I choose to upgrade.
If that's the case, maybe you'd be better off upgrading in 2019 or 2020? While the 2018 is new, maybe you'll get 30-60 mins more battery life out of it? But that gap will shrink as the battery ages. That and True Tone are of course still genuine improvements, but $1200 is a fair bit to pay for just that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac
What computer are you using at the moment? Do you feel the need to upgrade?

I am on 2016 MBP 13 with TB, the two bonuses for me are True Tone and larger battery. Quad core and keyboard and sound improvements only mean that I will be happier for longer. In a little dilemma of to upgrade or not! Paid $2300 for it, getting $1200 for it. Ridiculous. Will have to shell $1200 out of pocket again if I choose to upgrade.

For over a year and a half of use that isn't too bad. Especially considering the speed boost and general improvements this year has brought to the MBP. Its annoying but you can't really expect the buyer to hand over more for a laptop that is not much more than half as fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac
If that's the case, maybe you'd be better off upgrading in 2019 or 2020? While the 2018 is new, maybe you'll get 30-60 mins more battery life out of it? But that gap will shrink as the battery ages. That and True Tone are of course still genuine improvements, but $1200 is a fair bit to pay for just that.

Exactly and that is still just a guesstimate, as the prices are yet to be announced in my country and could be a 100 Dollars here or there. How would the 655 perform against the 550 (graphics)?
[doublepost=1531901742][/doublepost]
For over a year and a half of use that isn't too bad. Especially considering the speed boost and general improvements this year has brought to the MBP. Its annoying but you can't really expect the buyer to hand over more for a laptop that is not much more than half as fast.

Not much more than half as fast? You are referring to the quad versus dual core difference, right? Or something else? If it is even 30% faster overall, I think I could pay up the price for it.
 
Last edited:
Ordered the 15-inch pro without extra hardware about 2 days ago. I used the college discount so the beats solo3 should arrive today. I have to wait another 7-9 days for my mbp to come home, dammit. Why they always like this? I’m so excited, though. First time jumping from 13-inch to 15-inch. Going to be so fun!
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac
What computer are you using at the moment? Do you feel the need to upgrade?

I am on 2016 MBP 13 with TB, the two bonuses for me are True Tone and larger battery. Quad core and keyboard and sound improvements only mean that I will be happier for longer. In a little dilemma of to upgrade or not! Paid $2300 for it, getting $1200 for it. Ridiculous. Will have to shell $1200 out of pocket again if I choose to upgrade.

I’m using a 2011 MacBook Pro so yes the upgrade would be BIG for me. For you tho a 2016 is not that old so unless you need the power you could stick with the one you currently have.
 
Exactly and that is still just a guesstimate, as the prices are yet to be announced in my country and could be a 100 Dollars here or there. How would the 655 perform against the 550 (graphics)?
Graphics will be exactly the same as previously. Overall, how much of an improvement you see depends entirely on what you do. Theoretically you could see +20% for single core, and more than double the speed for multicore. Trouble is, for most things most people do with laptops, that doesn't translate to real world performance at all. People post all kinds of benchmarks, video rendering time is one popular thing. But we forget that the whole editing process for a video may be (let's say) 2 hours, and then the rendering takes 10 minutes. A faster machine may make the rendering take 7 minutes. But overall you have a total work time of 127 minutes instead of 130 minutes. That's really not a big difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac
I’m using a 2011 MacBook Pro so yes the upgrade would be BIG for me. For you tho a 2016 is not that old so unless you need the power you could stick with the one you currently have.

Graphics will be exactly the same as previously. Overall, how much of an improvement you see depends entirely on what you do. Theoretically you could see +20% for single core, and more than double the speed for multicore. Trouble is, for most things most people do with laptops, that doesn't translate to real world performance at all. People post all kinds of benchmarks, video rendering time is one popular thing. But we forget that the whole editing process for a video may be (let's say) 2 hours, and then the rendering takes 10 minutes. A faster machine may make the rendering take 7 minutes. But overall you have a total work time of 127 minutes instead of 130 minutes. That's really not a big difference.

Entirely true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245 and CodeJoy
Ha - so I see! Had just requested an i9/32GB/1TB 15" through work; was bummed to see this from Dave 2D. I shouldn't be surprised based on reviews of other laptops with i9s, including larger ones with gamer-style cooling (read: loud and max)... and yet, I still am. Apple giveth... Apple taketh away. Sigh...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheralSadurns
Ha - so I see! Had just requested an i9/32GB/1TB 15" through work; was bummed to see this from Dave 2D. I shouldn't be surprised based on reviews of other laptops with i9s, including larger ones with gamer-style cooling (read: loud and max)... and yet, I still am. Apple giveth... Apple taketh away. Sigh...
Maybe you haven't been paying attention to this thread the past week. I believe someone (no names) said on release day that there's effectively nothing to gain from choosing the i9, and some benchmarks now even suggest that the i9 is slower. It may even be the case that the different i7 options give just about exactly the same performance in real life. Of course, few listen, and just go with the hype anyway. I haven't seen the two i7's benchmarked in the MBP, but I've seen the same CPUs benchmarked in other laptops and there was little to no difference there.

Same with RAM speed that someone else discussed. Sure, 2400 looks faster than 2133, but in real life it makes zero difference. What would make more difference is if they do single or dual channel RAM, but I really have to assume that nothing other than dual channel would ever be considered. But at the end of the day, from the view of the CPU, RAM is really slow no matter how fast you make it.

...which is certainly why we're not seeing 4000 MHz RAM in the MBP even though that would theoretically be possible. It's just not cost effective for anyone.
 
A big part of me wishes I weren't so invested in all 306 pages of this thread and others, but thank you.

It would be worth it to upgrade to the i9 if it were properly cooled. This appears to be easier said than done, apparently.
 
There's a 13" i5 thread that seems to indicate you may not have dodged a bullet. I can't say for sure, since I'm paying more attention to the 15" laptop since that's what I ordered.
All ultrabooks throttle. The 2017's did, and all other brands (to my knowledge) also do. The 13" i5 still seems comparatively fine to me. The base 15" i7 is also probably fine.
 
I was afraid of this with the i9. I was hopeful it wouldn’t happen as much as it does, but no such luck it seems.

If I were buying a 15”, the only ones I’d consider are the i7 models, and probably the entry level i7-8750H. It’s already faster than the top of the line 2017 i7 anyway.
 
A big part of me wishes I weren't so invested in all 306 pages of this thread and others, but thank you.

It would be worth it to upgrade to the i9 if it were properly cooled. This appears to be easier said than done, apparently.
Oh, it certainly would. The specs on paper are quite impressive, and from only looking at that it would seem like a worthwhile upgrade, at least for some. No question there.

And imagine the outcry if they hadn't offered the i9. I think they had to, and they probably had little to no choice to change anything with the cooling either. They've probably done just about what they can do in that form factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aquamite
i suppose the i7 cpu ?
[doublepost=1531822774][/doublepost]
Trust me it is less hot than any 2012/2013 models..but i have the i7 six cores (15" base model with 512ssd), not i9...so i dont know about the i9
How is the heat issue. That is my biggest concern. Currently have a mid 2012 13” Air that is almost always cool. I have borrowed a stock mid 2015 15” Pro and found that it gets warm on my lap on the couch. And it is just a Quad. I want the 15” over the 13” but am worried both Pro sizes will run warm like that 2015 I’ve used, of which use is just email and web with some short YouTube videos while sitting on the couch. Maybe it is just that machine but I don’t relish the idea of a laptop that is uncomfortable on my lap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aquamite
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.