Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Time for Apple to ditch intel and go 'A' powered ?

Imagine a 64 core A10x mac pro ?

Please God, don't ever do that. From the rosetta days to intel was hard enough. Intel is here to stay.
[doublepost=1465881421][/doublepost]
"Unanimously"...well, we can leave it right there as far as that demonstrating what I was pointing out.

Count up the threads posted negatively and compare to your positive views. Unanimous is correct.
 
Please God, don't ever do that. From the rosetta days to intel was hard enough. Intel is here to stay.
[doublepost=1465881421][/doublepost]

Count up the threads posted negatively and compare to your positive views. Unanimous is correct.
Yeah, that's not what unanimous means. Just not how reality works.

Also, whether you realize it or not, there were long threads complaining about the release of the iPod back in the day right in these very forums with people pontificating how Apple had no clue what it was doing that it was all doomed and anything and everything else that could be thrown in there...we surely see how meaningful all those complaints and predictions were.
 
I seriously don't get all the hate. Here's what I think Apple did very well:
-Universal Clipboard: Cut Copy Paste across all Apple devices (Can I do this w/ Android + Chromebook natively?)
-Apple Watch Mac Unlock: Very convenient to unlock Mac with Apple Watch
-Storage Optimization for Mac
-Siri Improvements and Siri API for developers
-Delete Stock apps (not just disable or hide)
-New refreshed lock screen and rich notifications
-New Home app to control smart home from one central location
-VoIP API for calling apps
-Some, not all, of the new messages features
-Split view for Safari on iPad
-iCloud Drive desktop sync across iOS and all your Macs
-iCloud Drive Document folder sync across all devices
-Apple Pay in Safari
-More 3D Touch implementation across iOS 10
-Scribble for Apple Watch to reply to texts
-Refined UI on Apple Watch with less taps and scrolls to accomplish tasks
-Instant apps
-Dock feature on Apple Watch for easy app access
-Improved app load times
-SOS feature for emergencies on  Watch
-Control Center for  Watch
-Collaborative Notes
-Auto add Calendar events from Messages and Email
-Redesigned News and Music apps

Sure, they didn't do everything right, but this is a great step forward and provides a lot of great features that I will definitely take advantage of.
You just mentioned all they did not to embarrass themselves. The rest was simply embarrassing.

The Apple Music part specifically really, really was a flop... y'all. yeah. whoa!

Even with all the kids in the room, the applaus only came when there were definitely asking for it...

The above mentioned features are nice, but not WWDC keynote - worthy. Leave that for the new iPhone 7 with iOS 10 intro.
 
It seems you and many others here intentionally fail to understand what the purpose of a developer's conference is.

It's a four day event targeting developers who design apps for four different operating systems (macOS, iOS, watchOS, and tvOS), and opened with a keynote presentation with a top-level summary of those operating systems and key technology components and apps. During the four day period there are workshops and 1,000 Apple engineers available to help get developers up to speed on the changes.

There were significant updates discussed in the keynote to give developers a heads-up on what to expect. It's mind boggling and intellectually dishonest for those concluding it was only about an emoji update, the renaming of macOS, and, other than that not much else new.

Really? Perhaps the rest of the 4 day event is for devs but not this presentation. It's media and bloggers for the most part. This is Apple's presentation or attempt to tell the media what to report.

For those crying about hardware, Apple saves that for the fall season for the most part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MH01
Seems like there are people who like to pretend like nothing actually happened.

That's the wit of sarcasm ;) you cannot take it literally, but geez, not a lot did actually happen that would have the masses on MR praising it.....hence the sarcasm we see yesterday and today....
[doublepost=1465882055][/doublepost]
You just mentioned all they did not to embarrass themselves. The rest was simply embarrassing.

The Apple Music part specifically really, really was a flop... y'all. yeah. whoa!

Even with all the kids in the room, the applaus only came when there were definitely asking for it...

The above mentioned features are nice, but not WWDC keynote - worthy. Leave that for the new iPhone 7 with iOS 10 intro.

If the room was not filled with Apple employees, I suspect the applause would have been embarrassingly quite. There we a few times the crowd got involved, but most was lead by the in house employees. I remember the biggest applause being for the last video featuring devs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamieLannister
For everyone bemoaning the lack of hardware announcements, it's important to remember two key factors:
1. WWDC is a conference for developers. It's about software. That's the point. Sure, they've debuted hardware at WWDC before, but it's always a bonus or an aside. The conference is for developers to learn how to create better software on Apple's platforms, and part of that is rolling out new software features. It's not like the fall announcements that focus on hardware.
2. When it comes to new Macs, a lot of the blame lies with Intel. For years, they've been behind schedule releasing their new processors. That unreliability creates a nightmarish scenario for Apple, as they might have desired to announce a new MacBook or iMac or Mac Pro but Intel had other plans.
Apple is a hardware + software company.

Sadly, many of their products are way out of date (Thunderbolt display) and their Macbook Pros are stale compared to the competition.

Just an FYI Skylake has been out for almost a year.

What, in your own unbiased opinion, is Apple's excuse for not releasing updated laptops today?

You can't blame it on Intel anymore because the processors have been available for ages.
 
Last edited:
Come on now, how did Apple not add a time travel feature and introduce a new Apple Hoverboard? It's the least they could have done, and even that would have been barely acceptable as being innovative and new enough.

I think the main disappointment is from the lack of hardware, lol. Which was expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Dawes
Glad for the 7 minute version. I started watching the Keynote and after the hundredth "I've never been so excited", and "this is really magical" in the first 10 minutes, I was nauseated and turned it off. This is at least the third embarrassing keynote in a row.

I think there's a tendency to look back at the second era of Steve Jobs through rose colored glasses, but it *was* an amazing run... and unfortunately it's clearly over now. Apple will continue to make gazillions of dollars for the foreseeable future, but they're really losing what made them special.
 
Glad for the 7 minute version. I started watching the Keynote and after the tenth "I've never been so excited", and "this is really magical", I was nauseated and turned it off. This is at least the third embarrassing keynote in a row.

I think there's a tendency to look back at the second era of Steve Jobs through rose colored glasses, but it *was* an amazing run... and unfortunately it's clearly over now. Apple will continue to make gazillions of dollars for the foreseeable future, but they're really losing what made them special.
It's more along the lines of what's mentioned at https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/ios-expectations.1977389/ the anything else.
 
I seriously don't get all the hate. Here's what I think Apple did very well:
-Universal Clipboard: Cut Copy Paste across all Apple devices (Can I do this w/ Android + Chromebook natively?)
-Apple Watch Mac Unlock: Very convenient to unlock Mac with Apple Watch
-Storage Optimization for Mac
-Siri Improvements and Siri API for developers
-Delete Stock apps (not just disable or hide)
-New refreshed lock screen and rich notifications
-New Home app to control smart home from one central location
-VoIP API for calling apps
-Some, not all, of the new messages features
-Split view for Safari on iPad
-iCloud Drive desktop sync across iOS and all your Macs
-iCloud Drive Document folder sync across all devices
-Apple Pay in Safari
-More 3D Touch implementation across iOS 10
-Scribble for Apple Watch to reply to texts
-Refined UI on Apple Watch with less taps and scrolls to accomplish tasks
-Instant apps
-Dock feature on Apple Watch for easy app access
-Improved app load times
-SOS feature for emergencies on  Watch
-Control Center for  Watch
-Collaborative Notes
-Auto add Calendar events from Messages and Email
-Redesigned News and Music apps

Sure, they didn't do everything right, but this is a great step forward and provides a lot of great features that I will definitely take advantage of.

A couple good things in your list, but even most of that is gimmick and/or depends on Apple's buggy and not-thought-through cloud services. You think I'm going to trust Apple to 'clean' my Mac of documents and put them in their cloud? Only a fool would do that!

Hahahaha... you guys kill me.
I actually had the complete opposite reaction. I feel like Apple has re-found its footing and a conceptual direction forward. Just about every thing announced (except for the Minnie Mouse watch face), seemed like exactly the correct move. Really excited to see where this all goes.

Emojis and music streaming? Sheesh!

I'm actually satisfied with WWDC, they opened up iOS way more than expected. Siri, phone, messages, maps... Also, the ability to remove many stock apps further signals Apple moving in this direction. Yeah icloud drive is a half assed finder I agree, but aside from that, what else was everyone realistically expecting? Terminal? C'mon, you know that's not happening lol.

No, maybe something of significance to developers. Other than the mention of opening up certain apps, there wasn't much else. Maybe some new hardware. But, spending hours showing goof-off stuff isn't really what I expected, no.

For everyone bemoaning the lack of hardware announcements, it's important to remember two key factors:
1. WWDC is a conference for developers. It's about software.

But, they didn't really show much of significance to developers... and showed a whole lot of stuff of significance to... who?

2. When it comes to new Macs, a lot of the blame lies with Intel. For years, they've been behind schedule releasing their new processors. That unreliability creates a nightmarish scenario for Apple, as they might have desired to announce a new MacBook or iMac or Mac Pro but Intel had other plans.

There have been lots of updates since they've released anything in some of their product lines. What Intel is up against is something called physics. It's going to be mostly lower power and more cores from here on out.

I think the blame is that Apple just doesn't give much of a rip about the Mac anymore... too small pie slice.

Time for Apple to ditch intel and go 'A' powered ? Imagine a 64 core A10x mac pro ?

Maybe some day, but just give me a 12 core Intel CPU and I'll be happy... or incorporate some of the latest stuff into the lineup at a regular interval. How about an Apple eGPU box so people could quit complaining about Apple and GPU? How about a small laptop with usable GPU/CPU and a good screen? How about a headless non-Pro Mac that's good again? None of that is Intel's issue.

But, what you might see is them ditching Intel and Mac, and then you'll be stuck with your iPad Pro and Apple's lovely cloud and lack of a file system. Fun, huh?

Also, whether you realize it or not, there were long threads complaining about the release of the iPod back in the day right in these very forums with people pontificating how Apple had no clue what it was doing that it was all doomed and anything and everything else that could be thrown in there...we surely see how meaningful all those complaints and predictions were.

But, those were usually clueless 'industry experts' or Windows fanboys... not 30-year Apple evangelists. If you can't see the difference between the Apple that released the iPod and today's Apple, I think you need to open your eyes a bit.

It's going to take a while now, as they are a massive company with a lot of momentum. But, you can write it in the book if you like and hold me to it... if Apple keeps down the current path, yes, this time they are doomed. Why? Because what made the platform so successful was the focus on UX. Apple is now focused on profit margins. Apple used to really strive to build great products, now it's just a marketing slogan. That won't last forever.

I think the main disappointment is from the lack of hardware, lol. Which was expected.

Well, yes, THAT is quite disappointing. But, what's even more disappointing is that, apparently, big news to Apple's new target market is auto-emojis and text bubbles with effects.... and they choose a developer's conference to spend WAY too much time showing off such stupidity... AND some of that is what got big cheers out of 'DEVELOPERS'! (Kind of make one start to get serious about that survival cabin out in the mountains somewhere, far, far away.)
 
A couple good things in your list, but even most of that is gimmick and/or depends on Apple's buggy and not-thought-through cloud services. You think I'm going to trust Apple to 'clean' my Mac of documents and put them in their cloud? Only a fool would do that!



Emojis and music streaming? Sheesh!



No, maybe something of significance to developers. Other than the mention of opening up certain apps, there wasn't much else. Maybe some new hardware. But, spending hours showing goof-off stuff isn't really what I expected, no.



But, they didn't really show much of significance to developers... and showed a whole lot of stuff of significance to... who?



There have been lots of updates since they've released anything in some of their product lines. What Intel is up against is something called physics. It's going to be mostly lower power and more cores from here on out.

I think the blame is that Apple just doesn't give much of a rip about the Mac anymore... too small pie slice.



Maybe some day, but just give me a 12 core Intel CPU and I'll be happy... or incorporate some of the latest stuff into the lineup at a regular interval. How about an Apple eGPU box so people could quit complaining about Apple and GPU? How about a small laptop with usable GPU/CPU and a good screen? How about a headless non-Pro Mac that's good again? None of that is Intel's issue.

But, what you might see is them ditching Intel and Mac, and then you'll be stuck with your iPad Pro and Apple's lovely cloud and lack of a file system. Fun, huh?



But, those were usually clueless 'industry experts' or Windows fanboys... not 30-year Apple evangelists. If you can't see the difference between the Apple that released the iPod and today's Apple, I think you need to open your eyes a bit.

It's going to take a while now, as they are a massive company with a lot of momentum. But, you can write it in the book if you like and hold me to it... if Apple keeps down the current path, yes, this time they are doomed. Why? Because what made the platform so successful was the focus on UX. Apple is now focused on profit margins. Apple used to really strive to build great products, now it's just a marketing slogan. That won't last forever.



Well, yes, THAT is quite disappointing. But, what's even more disappointing is that, apparently, big news to Apple's new target market is auto-emojis and text bubbles with effects.... and they choose a developer's conference to spend WAY too much time showing off such stupidity... AND some of that is what got big cheers out of 'DEVELOPERS'! (Kind of make one start to get serious about that survival cabin out in the mountains somewhere, far, far away.)
That's the point, those were from those who were no more or less of "evangelists" as many threads in the archives would show. Clearly the comparison wasn't about what was released or what Apple is like now vs. then, but about people's reactions and what they mean (or basically don't mean).
 
"pretend"?? Now it the fault of those people that they want some new hardware or improvements that actually matter? Maybe Apple could "pretend" to care about them?
There are expectations based on reality and then there are that aren't really. Even that aside, whether or not something someone wanted was covered or not, doesn't mean that there wasn't anything else there. Logic doesn't quite work that way.
 
Yeah, that's not what unanimous means. Just not how reality works.

Also, whether you realize it or not, there were long threads complaining about the release of the iPod back in the day right in these very forums with people pontificating how Apple had no clue what it was doing that it was all doomed and anything and everything else that could be thrown in there...we surely see how meaningful all those complaints and predictions were.
Or if you want s more recent happening, the iPad. Or the Apple Watch. Hell, even the way every single iphone looks when leaked lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C DM
That's the point, those were from those who were no more or less of "evangelists" as many threads in the archives would show. Clearly the comparison wasn't about what was released or what Apple is like now vs. then, but about people's reactions and what they mean (or basically don't mean).

There has always been a crazy list of 'wishes' that don't come true. There have always been people who couldn't see the wisdom in the things Apple was doing. There have always been traditional 'industry experts' who wanted Apple to be more like every other tech company, etc.

I'm talking about a shift from UX being the driver... to profit margins and marketing gimmicks, and hoping that won't have a negative impact. And, no, I've been around the forums for a long, long time and I don't remember Apple evangelists thinking Apple was doomed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ixxx69
There are expectations based on reality and then there are that aren't really. Even that aside, whether or not something someone wanted was covered or not, doesn't mean that there wasn't anything else there. Logic doesn't quite work that way.

I was toying with words - no need to teach me logic ;-)

But, you're right, "expectations" of new hardware were foolish and not "based on reality". Haha!

The thing is this: Yes, I am very disappointed. But at this point I'm approaching acceptance; I'll find a way forward. Whether it's osx86 on a Dell XPS or just back to a dual-boot Windows/Linux laptop. It will be all right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveW928
The thing is this: Yes, I am very disappointed. But at this point I'm approaching acceptance; I'll find a way forward. Whether it's osx86 on a Dell XPS or just back to a dual-boot Windows/Linux laptop. It will be all right.

Exactly! But, I get miffed when people can't see how Apple has changed and what the implications might be. It's becoming obvious, we long-term Mac users just aren't the target market any longer. We're eventually going to have to bend to Apple's new plan for us to all use mobile devices or look elsewhere. That's not a pretty picture right now.

BUT, even assuming Apple is shifting from being a desktop/laptop maker to a mobile and car maker, there is still the problem of fundamental values and what drives what. Apple got to where they are today by making excellent products with a top-notch UX. That was their focus. They did that, and success followed.

Now, they've got success and seem to have forgotten how they got there. They've shifted to profit margins and marketing tactics being the driver, with UX being quite secondary, if not just part of the marketing slogan. THAT isn't going to end well, no matter where the industry goes or what products they make.

It's like the most fundamental shift a company could possibly make. And, it seems there are a lot of people who can't recognize what has happened.

Look, when Jobs died and people were saying... now it's over for Apple, I was one of the loudest people here saying that's crazy. As brilliant as Jobs was, he certainly wasn't coming up with everything. Certainly, Apple could continue on w/o Jobs and do really well... especially with all their success and cash-flow. BUT, what I hadn't anticipated, is that Apple's new leadership didn't really understand what made Apple special.

We're basically back to the Apple of the 90s, just with a LOT more cash in the bank, and at the moment, popularity.
 
Seems like there are people who like to pretend like nothing actually happened.

For people who run a business using Mac hardware nothing did happen. Our employees don't have iPads, nor do they log in to the company machines using their iCloud accounts, nor do I want them going home and finding all the company documents on their desktops.
 
Or just summarize with 4 words: No hardware, move along.
I haven't been following Apple long enough to know this - but is it to be expected that the release new hardware at WWDC, as opposed to the September event? Thought the Developer Conference was supposed to be focused on software etc., not hardware?

Sincere question, btw.
 
Well, with the Apple Watch the doomsayers were kind of right ;-) What an irrelevant thing, at least in its current incarnation.

For you perhaps. Assuming you haven't actually tried one.

I bought mine figuring I'd return it, but still needed to see for myself first hand, rather than rely on internet buh-blah.

Here it is almost a year later after being on my wrist every day, usually at least 12 hours a day. After a week of use there was no way I was going to send it back. As a point of reference, Apple has sold more than twice as many Watches than first generation iPhones during their first year of being available.

WatchOS 3.0 introduced today is a substantial update.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave245
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.