Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A New frame work to make aqua easier to lay on top of UNIX and Linux Apps

How many times when you wanted to run an open source Unix Or Linux application. You had to run the x11.app To make more applications available to the end user. Apple need to make it easier to draw aqua on top of an existing application. They helped the file system a lot by passing the single Unix specification 03. A lot of applications end up not having that apple feel . Example Firefox and OpenOffice. They had to have forks created called Camino and NeoOffice in order for aqua to be used. That leads to a lot of Mac open source apps being created several generations after they have been created on other platforms. Quality goes down when apps don't match the os's UI and printer calls.
 
Apple allows other OSes to run on its hardware .Sometime when you run a virtual machine you don't get the full power of an OS using virtual machine software such as vmwarefusion,parallels,or virtual box. Just look at all the people to who tried to triple boot mac hardware to run the MAC OS, Windows XP, And Ubuntu Linux. A lot of the hardware sells at Apple are from people who want really great hardware and a great OS but must run other oses because they have no choice.

Seriously? You can't create more than 4 partitions on a GPT drive? I'm 99% sure that's a violation of the GPT spec.
 
4,639 veiws and now 152 posts this is a great thread and its amazing what people would like to see in 10.6 but does anyone have something fresh and original, something truly "insanely great".

remember "mac users swear by their computers, windows users swear at their computers" its this way because of some amazing software and equally amazing hardware.

i love my macs and i will continue with macs to the end of either me or it, and i think it'll be me than them
 
Well no one has really thrown any crazy or weird ideas out there, but here's my shot at a feature I would love:

I want Photo Booth and iCal to integrate in such a way that I can take a picture of myself everyday and have it be recorded as such into iCal. Or even iCal and iPhoto integration so in your iCal you can see how many pictures you took one day, where, the event, etc.

This isn't that crazy of an idea, but I wanted to move away from Clevin's boring 2GB of printer drivers conflict.
 
I am wishing for more multi touch function capability, and more bootcamp features.

also MAKE THE FAST FORWARD IN QUICKTIME FASTER DAMN IT!

Maybe a new voice, like alex. This way Alex will have some one in his world to converse with.

ASIDE: I am lazy, but i think it would be fun to have a thread where a story was written about "ALEX" the new voice for leopard. All stories will be read by Alex and provide details on what it is like to be the voice of the ever sexy apple computers. Since I am lazy, maybe someone else will start it. thanks

OddUwon
 
Maybe I'm missing the point, but Safari and Office have literally nothing to do with each other.

Moving on, what if the UI would change according to the time of day? Kind of like the PS3 OS does with its background color. Based on the time of day the computer could offer up ideas for dinner or give Game scores or news updates or wrap-ups on the day, based on your preferences. Think of the computer as a personal assistant. The GUI would become dynamic.

I LOVE THAT IDEA!
 
Yay for non-existent battery-life on laptops!

This thread is pretty sad. As it was supposed to be a place for people to throw out random and interesting ideas, but instead people talk about boring things like ZFS and resolution independence.

But then as soon as someone has an idea, one that may seem a little crazy, it is shot down by some guy complaining about real world problems with the idea.
 
Safari

4) Cover-flow option for bookmarks, history, and downloads

6) Search Box auto-complete/suggestions

10) Phishing Filter
For C-F History, I use SafariStand as shown:

20080511-xkdfgcmnb5dy1kywxs3g9ccjhb.jpg


6. I recommend Inquisitor

7. 1Password gives you phishing protection

5. Inbuilt keyboard command for *optimise/maximise* - I have a quicksilver hack running but isn't that smooth.
Just set it up in the keyboard prefs, I have it as CMD+Option+Z
 
When I first heard the phrase 'illuminous', I thought it would be far more interesting. Perhaps hard to describe, but I was picturing an environment where there was an actual light source cast upon the desktop. Meaning instead of straight flat shadows dropped directly behind a window, their appearance would be dependent on where the light source was coming from. Likewise, background windows wouldn't simply grey out, they would fall into shadow based on their relationship to the light source. I think it would add a certain depth the environment that doesn't currently exist.

Of course it wouldn't apply to the content of an active window, but to everything else. Is it eye candy? Sure. But Apple eye-candy has always been about useful eye-candy, which I think this would be.
 
Things are already damn easy to put files in maps, organize, etc.. But I bet Apple can make an even easier way to organize files. Once in a while, I organize my files i just dropped somewhere, back in the right place. But since I'm lazy, I have 2 maps for icons. 2 pictures maps, old documents still somewhere, pictures somewhere loose, etc..

An other thing that would be really cool, is an interactive desktop. Not like widgets, but also customizable.
 
How many times when you wanted to run an open source Unix Or Linux application. You had to run the x11.app To make more applications available to the end user. Apple need to make it easier to draw aqua on top of an existing application. They helped the file system a lot by passing the single Unix specification 03. A lot of applications end up not having that apple feel . Example Firefox and OpenOffice. They had to have forks created called Camino and NeoOffice in order for aqua to be used. That leads to a lot of Mac open source apps being created several generations after they have been created on other platforms. Quality goes down when apps don't match the os's UI and printer calls.

Uh, a little understanding of the issues involved might help here.

It is perfectly easy to write to an application using Cocoa or Carbon. The reason Unix / Linux apps do not make use of it is because it is only available on Mac OS X and not on other Linux / Unix system. X11 is available on all these systems thus the vast majority of open source software is based on it (or a package which is built on top of it such as GTK+).
 
I'd like to see further integration with ical,mail, and address book, being able to set an option to view all of them in one integrated window kinda like outlook/entourage (i know blasphemous), but quick and convenient. and of course even better exchange support.
 
Most of the stuff I want is reasonably possible for future 10.5 updates, such as better accessibility options (like larger Finder Sidebar text)...


...Pressing shift while on Caps Lock should bring a letter to lowercase.

Both of these are huge pet peeves for me. The first one... I was trying to talk my wife into the larger iMac screen, but when she asked about resizing the font size and I couldn't do it... turned out to be a deal-breaker; she's sticking with her HP for now.

And the second one is so irritating.. I'm a law student so every few sentences I have to type case names, which should look like APPLE v. MICROSOFT, but I have to hit caps to type the "v." then turn it back on. Lame.
 
When I first heard the phrase 'illuminous', I thought it would be far more interesting. Perhaps hard to describe, but I was picturing an environment where there was an actual light source cast upon the desktop. Meaning instead of straight flat shadows dropped directly behind a window, their appearance would be dependent on where the light source was coming from. Likewise, background windows wouldn't simply grey out, they would fall into shadow based on their relationship to the light source. I think it would add a certain depth the environment that doesn't currently exist.

Of course it wouldn't apply to the content of an active window, but to everything else. Is it eye candy? Sure. But Apple eye-candy has always been about useful eye-candy, which I think this would be.

That would be a killer UI. I'd like it if the desktop had a bit of cover flow as well. Like instead of minimizing a window (who still minimizes?) the window would just turn away a like in coverflow when the window is off to the side.
 
Thought of another one

I know it may be blasphemous in this thread, but as a recent switcher one thing I miss from Windows is the various windows resizing options... Like when working with two pages documents it would be nice if I could automatically split the two windows evenly side by side "sort vertically" or something it was called. It's especially painful trying to do this manually, what with only one working resize corner in Mac.
 
I want Multi-Touch of course but one of the smaller things I would really like is to be able to manipulate inside save dialogues, like move a file, rename, add a folder, etc. It is so annoying that you have to close a save dialogue and open finder instead of just having the save dialogue be like a finder window with all of those capabilities in the first place!
 
I want Multi-Touch of course but one of the smaller things I would really like is to be able to manipulate inside save dialogues, like move a file, rename, add a folder, etc. It is so annoying that you have to close a save dialogue and open finder instead of just having the save dialogue be like a finder window with all of those capabilities in the first place!

I think you can already do some of those things in the save as dialogue. :) For example:
 

Attachments

  • save dialog.jpg
    save dialog.jpg
    88 KB · Views: 89
I know it may be blasphemous in this thread, but as a recent switcher one thing I miss from Windows is the various windows resizing options... Like when working with two pages documents it would be nice if I could automatically split the two windows evenly side by side "sort vertically" or something it was called. It's especially painful trying to do this manually, what with only one working resize corner in Mac.

That would be pretty simple to implement, I would imagine. All Apple would need to do is include that as an option in the menu when you right clicked the app's dock icon.

I want Multi-Touch of course but one of the smaller things I would really like is to be able to manipulate inside save dialogues, like move a file, rename, add a folder, etc. It is so annoying that you have to close a save dialogue and open finder instead of just having the save dialogue be like a finder window with all of those capabilities in the first place!

That would be great :|

And quick look in the save/open dialogue, too. That would be REALLY useful. In fact, it would make Quick Look a LOT more useful.

Oh and Quicklook should remain open and looking at the document you left it looking at when you change windows. Sometimes I listen to audio files with quicklook, but I don't want to just stare at my computer for 5 minutes, doing nothing while it plays.
 
im not quite sure there will be anymore exciting features in 10.6 that are bigger than 10.4 and 10.5. i mean OS X is such an advanced OS what else can you add without making it bloated?

what i will be looking forward to is the smaller features that arent 10.6's major selling point. stuff like adding "Go to folder" and Quick Look to the Finder open/save window. that would be cool.
 
This thread is pretty sad. As it was supposed to be a place for people to throw out random and interesting ideas, but instead people talk about boring things like ZFS and resolution independence.

But then as soon as someone has an idea, one that may seem a little crazy, it is shot down by some guy complaining about real world problems with the idea.

If I shot down anyone's ideas and you feel bad, I'm sorry. Practically is very important. Crazy is cool if it works. If it fails to work, like dynamic backgrounds which kills battery life, people will complain; a lot complainers are not computer proficient yet; they will complain, sue, and everything.
 
I think you can already do some of those things in the save as dialogue. :) For example:

Thanks for the pointer. But I still want just general ability though. Like being able to move files and folders and right click options like adding a folder, color coding, etc. I hate to say it because i LOATHE Microsoft, but Windows Explorer can do all those things :( Well not color coding HAHA :)
 
Thanks for the pointer. But I still want just general ability though. Like being able to move files and folders and right click options like adding a folder, color coding, etc. I hate to say it because i LOATHE Microsoft, but Windows Explorer can do all those things :(


It's taken me about a dozen 3rd party mac apps to get somewhat past this aggravation. It's really time apple admits that windows has a few nice file management tricks that OSX doesn't, simply out of what would appear to be stubbornness. Would it really be so terrible and scarry dangerous to be able to simply right click a file or folder and hit "cut" for instance? :rolleyes:
 
Add brains to the OS

4,639 veiws and now 152 posts this is a great thread and its amazing what people would like to see in 10.6 but does anyone have something fresh and original, something truly "insanely great".

Hmm, how about intelligence?

The ultimate end goal here is give the enough intelligence that we can interact with our computers the same as we do with other people (well, some of us, at least :)), where you can just talk to your computer and it will understand you semantically (in any language you speak). This won't entirely get rid of keyboards because not everyone wants to dictate to a computer all day long, but in many cases it would eliminate a huge amount of manual work. "Computer, please take this data, perform the appropriate statistical analysis and tell me if I discovered something significant."

Such technology goes way beyond 10.6 and even OS XI (11). :cool:

But for the near future, here's an idea to get started...

Right now, the operating system and all the apps just execute the same rote code. First, I'd like to see an OS that monitors what we do as we use our computers and take actions on our behalf.

For one example, when I download a file, it gets put into the downloads folder that ultimately just ends up getting cluttered.

Today we are left to solve the clutter only by relatively manual means, by using Spotlight, Smart Folder and perhaps programs like ShoveBox and Hazel.

I think the next step is to automate the process by adding intelligence to the OS.

One possibility is a keyword prioritization engine that in some ways is like the page ranking in Google, sort of like a Spotlight on Steroids, if you will. The OS would implement a neural net algorithm to learn which keywords are important to us and then examine downloaded material to organize stuff for us automatically. It can create folders (normal folders) and move what's downloaded to these places (and the Downloads folders becomes a smart folder, which contains a list of everything we ever downloaded--and when they were downloaded [I believe that would be new attribute for the file system[). Images downloaded from a web page could be organized according the keywords on this page. Eventually such an engine could be implemented with very sophisticated to intelligence to examine the actual image.

Keyword prioritization could be very useful elsewhere. If I get an email telling me there is smoke in the building I'm in, it will stop everything and literally yell at me to get out. :)

This is just one aspect of intelligence. There are plenty of others and it extends to applications as well. For example, when I work on images in Canvas and keep the original in Canvas format, I very often export the final product as a jpeg. A smart OS would see that I'm doing this and then do it for me automatically.

When I print a long manual of some kind, I often print 4-up to save paper and make it more compact to handle. A smart OS would examine the PDF document, determine it's long and automatically configure the printer to print 4-up.

When I put a blank DVD in one drive a full one in another, it will guess that I probably want to copy one to the other and offer to do that. I shouldn't have to sit there and configure the brainless UI in Toast every time.

Incidentally, the ultimate OS that has the intelligence that I described at the top no longer requires programming once it's "completed" The neural net essentially is working like our brains and rewriting its own code. A problem with that is will effectively put software programmers out of their own jobs. :eek:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.