20 years ago I loved the book. I really like the first movie, and I'm okay with the second two. My youngest has been eagerly awaiting the release, and really we all enjoyed this one, too.I am so dissapointed by these comments! Was Spielberg involved in this movie in any capacity? That (him missing) might explain a weak script.
Regarding APlotdevice's comment, just watched the original Jurassic Park and have always a bit irritated how they told only a small part of the book because I think they felt the need for an adequate setup and the description of how Dino's were made, not wanting a four hour movie, while I simultaneously acknowledge what a good movie it is.
And I acknowledge the missing parts of the book have slowly found their way onto the big screen. Jurassic Park II- Girl and Compies, which was referenced on the mainland? Jurassic Park III- Aviary and trip down river. JP3 is pretty outstanding, minimal setup, right into some great action.
I don't care about the characters. I don't see much personal development. We were stupid before, lets do it again, but bigger. The whole storyline and plot are missing... personality. I'll watch it again.
Last night I watched About Time. Technically sci-fi, it really is an interesting study of a family and how they interact. Along the lines of Love, Actually, quite enjoyable, typical British humor and story. Much more happy and sweet than The Butterfly Effect. I still haven't figured out the point of the uncle, but meh.