I watched The Titan a couple of days ago. Interesting movie, it wasn't what I expected.
View attachment 814070
What’s this about?
Jack the Giant Slayer (2013)- Good story, nice CGI, they did a great job animating the giants. I was listening to the voice of the Head Giant, General Fallon and thought, he sounded just like Davey Jones, in Pirates. Yep, Bill Nighy.
We watched it on Google Play — It is also available to rent on YouTube.I remember seeing a trailer for that at the start of summer. I wasn't aware it was now available.
Thanks. Will do Prime. Speaking of that period, have you caught that new miniseries called Das Boot based on the original film?We watched it on Google Play — It is also available to rent on YouTube.
Not yet… though I have read mixed reports on it.Thanks. Will do Prime. Speaking of that period, have you caught that new miniseries called Das Boot based on the original film?
There's another film called Walking with the Enemy. I believe it's a Czech or Polish developed film. I remember it being decent.
Which version or versions have you seen?Not yet… though I have read mixed reports on it.
I do remember the original '80s series with Jürgen Prochnow — going to be hard to beat that!
Thanks for the recommendation — Walking with the Enemy — I shall look out for it.
It gets confusing with all these "Das Boot".Which version or versions have you seen?
I agree! Very often the average war pic is a formulaic bit of preamble and then boom, boom, bang. And as you say, leaves you wondering what you just watched.Modern war films suffer and or fail due to the lack of nuance and charisma in the roles actors play. Now it's action, talk, action, more action, and some random ending that has you questioning what you just sat through.
It was very good!Here is something astonishingly excellent.
The kind of film Hollywood wouldn't dare to make.
Uncomfortable, horrifying, farcical, beautifully filmed, and very well acted by Max Hubacher as the baby faced killer.
Based on a little known episode in the final weeks of WWII.
An army deserter on the run finds a Captain's uniform… the story of Willi Herold.
![]()
PS. And the end credits left me really disturbed. Never say it can't happen again.
The Mummy (1999)- So superior to the 2017 crappy Tom Cruise remake, good atmosphere and action, filmed in Marrakech, Morraco and the Sahara Desert. I really like how they turned dung beetles into a fast moving swarm of piranas.
It wasn't a remake. The 1999 film wasn't even an original version. I've explained this before to you.The Mummy (1999)- So superior to the 2017 crappy Tom Cruise remake, good atmosphere and action, filmed in Marrakech, Morraco and the Sahara Desert. I really like how they turned dung beetles into a fast moving swarm of piranas.
[doublepost=1546727879][/doublepost]I wish they made a remake of The Rocketeer.Primarily because the 1999 version isn't an original. It's a reboot of the 1932 film, The Mummy. The 1999 version had a more warm side to it in terms of dialogue and action sequences. The '32 version was more horror based like the 2017 version. While the 2017 version did rely on CGI, it paid more homage to the '32 version, yet still failed tremendously short of it, than the 1999 version. A lot of people confuse the original The Mummy with a film that came out a decade later called Mummy's Hand which was a zombie mummy killer movie. So here's the deal. Universal has held onto the monster/horror franchise for nearly a century (in a few years). The Mummy '32 is essentially a mashup of various concepts from their '20s and very early 1930-1931 movies. The horror genre and what people perceived to be horror then was popular up until the mid 70s, when people began watching other movies. I think you're old enough to remember spaghetti westerns being the bees knees for most of the 50s and 60s, and then dying out like a candle flame. The 1999 reboot of the franchise was great. The 2017 reboot was a reboot of the '32 and included science fiction and old school horror, but what Universal fails to understand is that brand of horror and modern day horror isn't all too popular with people. This is why Universal put the next film in their schedule, Bride of Frankenstein, on hold. The market just isn't ready for it.
I mean, Universal could have done it the smart way. More sci-fi, less traditional old-school horror. Side-by-side-by-side timelines of various periods in the past revolving around the subject matter/antagonist of the movie. Time hopping evil taking shape in various forms of humans.
But as I've said in the past, horror just isn't a huge seller like it used to be. Even in literature. You could argue with King, but it's King, you can hardly discredit him apart from his appalling prose at times. Literary fiction enjoys more sales than horror. Let that sink in.
Films wise, movie-goers want something funny or action packed or ridiculously sci-fi.
I
[doublepost=1546727879][/doublepost]I wish they made a remake of The Rocketeer.
You don’t think I know that the 1999 movie is not the original? The 2017 version is a remake, same title, same story more or less.It wasn't a remake. The 1999 film wasn't even an original version. I've explained this before to you.
[doublepost=1546727879][/doublepost]I wish they made a remake of The Rocketeer.
It's a remake of the 1932 film, not the 1999 film.You don’t think I know that the 1999 movie is not the original? The 2017 version is a remake, same title, same story more or less.
Disney owns the rights to it. I sincerely doubt they'd fudge it. Though I know what you're trying to say. Years ago there were whispers to remake Tucker (the car movie) and that was shut down within a week. That film is already great. Can't redo it to be better. Though it'd be neat to see a modern take on The Manhattan Project. Change the story up a little, of course.You bite your tongue! That movie is perfect and a classic and no remake could ever do it justice! Hollywood needs to stop doing remakes of good films (as well as bad films) and start turning out original material.