You should as Lifeforce is a cracking film and thankfully one that's not been overly commercialised with remake's & reboot's that in general are inferior to the original...I used to listen to the soundtrack for that one. Henry Mancini, I believe. Honestly, never watched the film. Have to look it up.
Not a fan of Tom Cruise, but I'll give the new Top Gun a shot...
I am. More specifically to his craft as an actor, especially in the sci-fi genre.I don't think anyone is a really a fan of the guy
Apocalypse Now
![]()
It's all been said before, if you haven't, you must. This film encapsulates art, war, horror, personal angst and far much more than I can express here..."I love the smell of Napalm in the morning"
n.b. Multiple versions take your pick, as none are bad, just different, only Full Metal Jacket comes close...
Q-6
I am. More specifically to his craft as an actor, especially in the sci-fi genre.
That said, he’s the top paid actor in the film industry averaging about~ 22 million a film. I’d say there’s a reason that Cruise is ‘liked’ by millions, aside from a few people on a tech site.![]()
Some of his movies are excellent and others blah.Fair enough... I don't like him, but I like his movies. Hope that makes sense.
Some of his movies are excellent and others blah.
Good:
The first Mission Impossible was pure, after that they went downhill for my tastes. After the original I liked, was shocked by the second one, a kungfu director, when 2 people fly at each other on motorcycles, with a closure that looks like 100mph, jump off their bikes, smack into each other fall to the ground and getup and start fighting. As with many action stars I can’t say I see a lot of range there with Cruise, but what he does is good enough for the type film he specializes in.
- Risky Business
- Top Gun
- Mission Impossible (original)
- A Few Good Men
- Rain Man
- Oblivion
- Top Gun: Maverick- to be determined.
I find no fault with Tom Cruise.
True, if I had such wealth I'd put it to good use, not fool about with such nonsense. Scientology is very obviously a cult designed to turn coin and control people. The fact that Tom Cruise is involved, immediate turn off and I have zero interest in expanding his fortune...That whole Scientology thing just creeps me out.
That's not his fault...That whole Scientology thing just creeps me out.
That whole Scientology thing just creeps me out.
The publicized personal details of Cruise’s life and Scientology besides being a controlling jerk (if reports are accurate) were definitely a hit against his popularity. Thinking what a jerk while watching a performance tends to interfere with immersion.That whole Scientology thing just creeps me out.
TBH that's kind of what I think and tend to avoid his films. That and the cookie cutter nature of them all...The publicized personal details of Cruise’s life and Scientology besides being a controlling jerk (if reports are accurate) were definitely a hit against his popularity. Thinking what a jerk while watching a performance tends to interfere with immersion.
I find no fault with Tom Cruise.
The publicized personal details of Cruise’s life and Scientology besides being a controlling jerk (if reports are accurate) were definitely a hit against his popularity. Thinking what a jerk while watching a performance tends to interfere with immersion.
CGI is pretty impressive stuff.Top Gun 2 was fantastic. The cinematography was excellent. The only weird part was how Tom Cruise is 59 but he’s also 35.
It was very good. One interesting thing I didn’t think of until I just saw a review that pointed it out: there’s no agenda. It’s not trying to raise awareness for climate change (The Day After Tomorrow) or anything like that. It’s just a good movie with incredible aerial cinematography and some nice call-backs to this first movie.CGI is pretty impressive stuff.
Honestly though, I’ve heard nothing but stellar things about Top Gun Maverick. I think I boot that one up this weekend.
I’m going to revisit the first Top Gun and then watch T.G.M. As I heard there’s quite a few nods to the first film as you mentioned.It was very good. One interesting thing I didn’t think of until I just saw a review that pointed it out: there’s no agenda. It’s not trying to raise awareness for climate change (The Day After Tomorrow) or anything like that. It’s just a good movie with incredible aerial cinematography and some nice call-backs to this first movie.