Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which of these devices won't make the cut for iOS 8?

  • iPhone 4

    Votes: 272 91.3%
  • iPhone 4S

    Votes: 49 16.4%
  • iPad 2

    Votes: 178 59.7%
  • Third Generation iPad

    Votes: 50 16.8%
  • First Generation iPad mini

    Votes: 42 14.1%
  • Fifth Generation iPod touch

    Votes: 31 10.4%

  • Total voters
    298
What I said does not nullify the iPad 3 from getting iOS 8. It, the iPad 3, will follow the pattern of the iPod Touch 3 and iPad 1 with iOS 5. Those devices were no longer sold, but only got two iOS versions thus requiring they get a third. The iPad 2 set a cycle of four versions, of which the iPad 3 has only gotten three. The iPad 2 and 3 have different abilities. The iPad 2 has a more limited GPU and is under greater memory constraints, but they both have the same computational powers. The iPad 1's A4 is clocked at 1Ghz resulting around 456 Geekbench score. The iPhone 4's and iPod Touch 4's is only 800Mhz with a score of only 386. Computationally, the iPad 1 is the most powerful A4 device. Apple had to give the iPod Touch iOS 6 because it only had two versions of iOS. It still being on sale is irrelevant to the equation. Apple needed to fulfill the third version of iOS. Apple could have released an A5 powered iPod Touch 5 that was in the same package as the iPod Touch 4 in 2011 along with the iPhone 4S, as they have done with the iPod Touch 2 and 3, then discontinued the iPod Touch 4. Even discontinued in October of 2011, it still would have gotten iOS 6. Apple's adoption numbers only include devices that regularly access the App Store. The older iOS 4-6 devices that sit in drawers or not being used aren't counted. If Apple was somehow able to include them, iOS 7's adoption rate would be much less. [..] Apple Care doesn't do anything for software updates, only hardware repairs. Of which Apple will continue to repair and service any iOS device up to 5 years since it was removed from public sale. So all those people out there who just bought an iPad 2 with Apple Care will still be able to get their device serviced for another 5 years. They knew there was something better out there in the form of the iPad 3 and 4, just like those that bought the iPod Touch 4 knew that it was rather outdated.

Apple serves a one year warranty by default. Tell me which device that got axed but didn't get the next iOS update the same year that ISN'T the Touch 4. The only device you can compare with is the iPad 3, which still got the next update.

Apple has no limit to how many iOS updates each device should have. You are implying 3 updates is the limit, but iPad 2 has 4. iPad 2 has the potential to get 5 updates.

iPad 3 may have more graphical abilities than the 2, but it doesn't change the fact that 3 runs slower than 2 thanks to its retina display.

iPad 1 may have a good benchmark compared to Touch 4/iPhone 4, but the benchmark is useless now on iOS 6. iPad 1 runs slower than iPhone 4 because its lack of RAM.

They can abandon the iPad 2. Just think about all those people that got an iPod Touch 4 in May of 2013 with a few years of Apple Care. Only to be left behind by iOS 7.

Stop USING that example! The exception was Touch 4 cannot run iOS 7 because of its lack of RAM! iPad 2 doesn't lack any RAM compared to its brothers. Touch 4 would definitely get iOS 7 IF it had 512MB RAM like iPhone 4.
 
Apple serves a one year warranty by default. Tell me which device that got axed but didn't get the next iOS update the same year that ISN'T the Touch 4. The only device you can compare with is the iPad 3, which still got the next update.

Apple has no limit to how many iOS updates each device should have. You are implying 3 updates is the limit, but iPad 2 has 4. iPad 2 has the potential to get 5 updates.

iPad 3 may have more graphical abilities than the 2, but it doesn't change the fact that 3 runs slower than 2 thanks to its retina display.

iPad 1 may have a good benchmark compared to Touch 4/iPhone 4, but the benchmark is useless now on iOS 6. iPad 1 runs slower than iPhone 4 because its lack of RAM.



Stop USING that example! The exception was Touch 4 cannot run iOS 7 because of its lack of RAM! iPad 2 doesn't lack any RAM compared to its brothers. Touch 4 would definitely get iOS 7 IF it had 512MB RAM like iPhone 4.

Exactly!! Apple is gonna annoy a lot of people if it discontinues iPad 2 support :p

http://gigaom.com/2013/10/21/the-ipad-2-is-apples-most-widely-used-tablet-2/

Yes that was over 9 months ago, but considering they were still selling them up until recently, I doubt that its changed that much.
 
Apple serves a one year warranty by default. Tell me which device that got axed but didn't get the next iOS update the same year that ISN'T the Touch 4. The only device you can compare with is the iPad 3, which still got the next update.

Apple has no limit to how many iOS updates each device should have. You are implying 3 updates is the limit, but iPad 2 has 4. iPad 2 has the potential to get 5 updates.

iPad 3 may have more graphical abilities than the 2, but it doesn't change the fact that 3 runs slower than 2 thanks to its retina display.

iPad 1 may have a good benchmark compared to Touch 4/iPhone 4, but the benchmark is useless now on iOS 6. iPad 1 runs slower than iPhone 4 because its lack of RAM.



Stop USING that example! The exception was Touch 4 cannot run iOS 7 because of its lack of RAM! iPad 2 doesn't lack any RAM compared to its brothers. Touch 4 would definitely get iOS 7 IF it had 512MB RAM like iPhone 4.


If iPad Air 2 and iPad mini Retina 2 gets 2GB RAM and RAM requirement of iOS 8 set to 1GB, yes, iPad 2 and alone with iPad mini, iPod Touch 5 will get annexed. I think chances of iPad 2 not getting iOS 8 is still higher than iPad 3. There is lot of feature missing on iPad 2... There is highly likely some features new to iOS 8 will make iPad 2 not upgradable.
 
If iPad Air 2 and iPad mini Retina 2 gets 2GB RAM and RAM requirement of iOS 8 set to 1GB, yes, iPad 2 and alone with iPad mini, iPod Touch 5 will get annexed. I think chances of iPad 2 not getting iOS 8 is still higher than iPad 3. There is lot of feature missing on iPad 2... There is highly likely some features new to iOS 8 will make iPad 2 not upgradable.

If iOS 8 requires 1GB of RAM, not only 5s, 5, 5c and recent iPads will start crashing a lot due to lack of RAM...

...but all A5 devices will be axed. That includes the (yep) iPad 2, iPad 3, iPhone 4s, iPod Touch (5th) and Mini (1st gen).

However seriously? I don't think iOS 8 will require 1GB of RAM. That virtually destroys the devices that are on sale now including the 5s!
 
Apple would not axe any of the 3 A5 devices it sells at the moment, and they all have 512 MB of ram. Also iOS 8 is predicted to be a small update, thus I think 512 MB with dual core A5 will be the minimum.
 
The one year warranty is for hardware, not as much for software. On the software side of it, the iPod Touch 4 did get some updates to fix some problems within one year after is was removed from sale. It's possible that the iPad 2 could get an iOS 7.1.2 or 7.1.3 update to fix some problems as was done with the iPod Touch 4. The iPad 3 got the next version of iOS because it has not fulfilled its iOS version requirements. Simple as that. Apple does have an upper limit to iOS version support as limited by the device's hardware lifecycle. The most they could get is N+6 versions of iOS for a maximum of 7 versions. I'm not implying that the iPad limit is three. Only that the iPod and early iPhone limit is that. We, being the public, do not yet know the iOS support limit for iPads, iPad Minis, and iOS based Apple TVs. In graphical benchmarking tests, the iPad 3 runs just as well, if not better than, the iPad 2. When comparing an iOS 4 or iOS 5 iPad 1 and iPhone 4, the iPhone is nearly always slower at loading things which is where the majority of iOS' perceived sluggishness comes from. Because of this, the iPad 1 is a faster device to use on iOS 4 or 5. Why should I stop using the iPod Touch 4 as an example? It fits very well in to this pattern, with or without knowing its constraints. Apple doesn't care much for the lack of memory. The iPhone 3G and iPod Touch 2G only had 128MB, but they got iOS 4. It run horridly, but it ran. No reason why Apple couldn't trim off some features and wedge it onto there or cram iOS 6 onto an iPad 1.

If iOS 8 requires 1GB of RAM, not only 5s, 5, 5c and recent iPads will start crashing a lot due to lack of RAM...

...but all A5 devices will be axed. That includes the (yep) iPad 2, iPad 3, iPhone 4s, iPod Touch (5th) and Mini (1st gen).

However seriously? I don't think iOS 8 will require 1GB of RAM. That virtually destroys the devices that are on sale now including the 5s!

Not all A5 devices will be killed off if iOS 8 requires 1GB of memory. The iPad 3 will get it as it has 1GB of memory. Putting in such a requirement would not sit well for the general public as the iPhone 4S is still on sale and the past two iPhones previous have gotten four versions of iOS. It would also not fulfill the iPad Mini 1 and iPod Touch 5's requirement of at least three versions of iOS.
 
If iOS 8 requires 1GB of RAM, not only 5s, 5, 5c and recent iPads will start crashing a lot due to lack of RAM...

...but all A5 devices will be axed. That includes the (yep) iPad 2, iPad 3, iPhone 4s, iPod Touch (5th) and Mini (1st gen).

However seriously? I don't think iOS 8 will require 1GB of RAM. That virtually destroys the devices that are on sale now including the 5s!

Even 1GB of RAM is not enough for iOS 7... Here are still tons of app refreshing and tab reloading issue on current devices. I am not surprise iOS 8 would result similar thing.

One thing is certain, iPad 2 missed whole lots of iOS 7 features. I will not be surprised some features on iOS 8 would make iPad 2 finally get axed.
 
The one year warranty is for hardware, not as much for software. On the software side of it, the iPod Touch 4 did get some updates to fix some problems within one year after is was removed from sale. The iPad 3 got the next version of iOS because it has not fulfilled its iOS version requirements. Simple as that. Apple does have an upper limit to iOS version support as limited by the device's hardware lifecycle. The most they could get is N+6 versions of iOS for a maximum of 7 versions. I'm not implying that the iPad limit is three. Only that the iPod and early iPhone limit is that. We, being the public, do not yet know the iOS support limit for iPads, iPad Minis, and iOS based Apple TVs. In graphical benchmarking tests, the iPad 3 runs just as well, if not better than, the iPad 2. When comparing an iOS 4 or iOS 5 iPad 1 and iPhone 4, the iPhone is nearly always slower at loading things which is where the majority of iOS' perceived sluggishness comes from. Because of this, the iPad 1 is a faster device to use on iOS 4 or 5. Why should I stop using the iPod Touch 4 as an example? It fits very well in to this pattern, with or without knowing its constraints. Apple doesn't care much for the lack of memory. The iPhone 3G and iPod Touch 2G only had 128MB, but they got iOS 4. It run horridly, but it ran. No reason why Apple couldn't trim off some features and wedge it onto there or cram iOS 6 onto an iPad 1.



Not all A5 devices will be killed off if iOS 8 requires 1GB of memory. The iPad 3 will get it as it has 1GB of memory. Putting in such a requirement would not sit well for the general public as the iPhone 4S is still on sale and the past two iPhones previous have gotten four versions of iOS. It would also not fulfill the iPad Mini 1 and iPod Touch 5's requirement of at least three versions of iOS.

So you agree that there is no limit to how many iOS updates a device could get, but the minimum each device has is 3.

So again, since there is no limit - what would stop the iPad 2 from getting iOS 8? Saying it's old is a poor excuse, especially it still runs good on iOS 7.

And no, Touch 4 doesn't fit well in the comparison. Touch 4 can't get iOS 7 because of its RAM, simple as that. Not because "it's old". iPad 2 doesn't lack any RAM compared to its brothers (except iPad 3).

The only reason you can think of really is iPad 2 won't get 8 because "it's old".
Even 1GB of RAM is not enough for iOS 7... Here are still tons of app refreshing and tab reloading issue on current devices. I am not surprise iOS 8 would result similar thing.

One thing is certain, iPad 2 missed whole lots of iOS 7 features. I will not be surprised some features on iOS 8 would make iPad 2 finally get axed.

I agree with you there. That's why I'm saying iOS 8 will probably be iPad 2's last update. But it's not escaping iOS 8. It maybe old, but it's too early to axe especially when there is nothing stopping it from getting it (unless 4s, mini 1st and others can't get it)
 
Last edited:
Its overall age is a small factor in its iOS support. It is no longer sold and has met the current trend of four iOS versions. Those are the major factors. In Apple's view it may perform sub-par on iOS 7 and 8 or it could be that Apple no longer wants to develop iOS for it. Maybe the stars aren't in alignment anymore. There is a limit of 7 iOS versions as after such time iOS devices are no longer in the Supported stage of their hardware lifecycle. Standing by itself the iPad 2 runs iOS 7 well. But once compared to the iPad 4 or Air it shows its age rather quickly. Just like the 4S shows its age when compared to the 5 or 5S, but appears to run iOS 7 well when compared to previous versions of iOS on it. Even the 3Gs can run iOS 6 well when not compared to newer iPhones. Same goes for the iPhone 4 and iOS 7. The only device that couldn't run its last version of iOS well without comparing it to newer devices would be the iPhone 3G. Saying the iPod Touch 4 couldn't get iOS 7 due to ram limitations is quite silly. Apple could have done it, we the public know very little about what they can cram into an iOS device. The iPhone 3G and iPod Touch 2G are an example of that. Its limitations aside and knowing that we don't know Apple's full ability with iOS on its devices leaves us to know that the only device that compares to the iPad 2 at this time is the iPod Touch 4 and it is a good comparison.
 
Its overall age is a small factor in its iOS support. It is no longer sold and has met the current trend of four iOS versions. Those are the major factors.

There is no trend. iPad 2, iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 are the only iOS devices that had up to 4 iOS upgrades so far, with 3GS the only device at the moment that Apple has stopped supporting. And why? Because of its performance issues with iOS 6. It can't cope with iOS 7.

iPhone 4 arguably is on its last legs too, meaning iOS 7 will probably be its last upgrade. Or! Apple could surprise us and 4 gets iOS 8!! After all, there is no trend. The longest running iPad 2 and iPhone 4 are still ongoing until the announcement of 8, when I expect iPad 2 to get renewed for one more year.

But what makes iPad 2 stand out against 3GS and iPhone 4? It's not on its last legs.

In Apple's view it may perform sub-par on iOS 7 and 8 or it could be that Apple no longer wants to develop iOS for it. Maybe the stars aren't in alignment anymore. There is a limit of 7 iOS versions as after such time iOS devices are no longer in the Supported stage of their hardware lifecycle. Standing by itself the iPad 2 runs iOS 7 well. But once compared to the iPad 4 or Air it shows its age rather quickly. Just like the 4S shows its age when compared to the 5 or 5S, but appears to run iOS 7 well when compared to previous versions of iOS on it.

iPad 2 running sub-par is enough for them to continue to support it. iPad 2 will majorly help them with the adaption rate, since many educational places have iPad 2.

Yes if you compare iPad 2 with any newer iOS device OF COURSE the iPad 2 is slow. But that can be said with iPhone 5c and 5s. Mini (1st) and Mini (2nd). That can be said when you compare any old device to a new device.

However try and compare iPad 2 with any of its brothers. Arguably the SAME speed.

iPad 2 has aged, but it still uses the A5 chip. The A5 family is the biggest and longest family led by the iPad 2. No matter how well you look at it, for it to survive 4 upgrades and still run decently shows it's a beast. And because iPad 2 isn't struggling (or pushed to its limit) it is capable of getting that last upgrade (iOS 8). As I said before, if iPad 2 doesn't get 8 while the rest did, it's because Apple are smelling their own farts. Not because it's incapable or "it's old". This "old" device was in Apple stores months ago.

Saying the iPod Touch 4 couldn't get iOS 7 due to ram limitations is quite silly. Apple could have done it, we the public know very little about what they can cram into an iOS device.

No it's not silly. If you think that's silly, then saying iPad 2 won't get it because it's old and has 4 upgrades already is even more silly. There is no limit for how many upgrades an device can get.

How many times do I have to say this? iOS 7 requires at least 512MB of RAM. Touch 4 has 256. That HALF the requirement. No matter how much they cram, it simply won't work. Especially iOS 7.0.x when 5s even struggled with it.

The iPhone 3G and iPod Touch 2G are an example of that. Its limitations aside and knowing that we don't know Apple's full ability with iOS on its devices leaves us to know that the only device that compares to the iPad 2 at this time is the iPod Touch 4 and it is a good comparison.

You are again comparing single core, retro Apple devices (+ Touch 4) to the dual core A5 iPad 2. Touch 4 is not a comparison and never will be because it's not in the same position as iPad 2 as Touch 4 didn't get axed the way iPad 2 did. Touch 4 continued to be on sale until Touch 5 was released along with iPhone 5. Only iPad 3 is comparable.

iPad 2 does not have 256MB of RAM, does not run single core, does not run the slowest out of its family. It's just not comparable.
 
You're dead set in wanting iOS 8 on the iPad 2. There's no changing your mind. You'd probably even demand Apple to release it for the iPad 2 once it is announce at WWDC and the iPad 2 is not on the list of supported devices. A trend is a general direction in which something is developing or changing. The iPhone 4 is currently following step for step in those of the 3Gs. Thus, creating a trend. The iPad 1 and 2 have taken different directions and thus not a trend. The iPad 2 doesn't stand out anymore than the 3Gs or iPhone 4. All are older, now outdated technology. That does indeed struggle with some of iOS 7's things. Oh the fuss that was given when the iPad 1 was left behind at iOS 5 when the other A4 devices got iOS 6. It'll be that all over again, but this time with the iPad. So is the cost of having an iPad released in March with iOS being released in October. Most of the educational places that bulk bought iPad 2's through Apple's education sources did so under a lease type agreement with Apple that is good for only a few years. The earlier iPad 2's sold under such an agreement have already been replaced with iPad 4's. Hence why the iPad 4 was brought back to market. People on these very forums have commented on how the iPad Mini and iPod Touch 5 are faster feeling than the iPad 2. Could it be more of Apple's speed padding to make older devices appear slower or are really just that much slower than newer A5 devices? As far as memory restrictions go, in many threads on these forums people complain that the iPad 2 has hit its limits in terms of memory. It does have a higher base memory usage than other A5 devices. If it doesn't get iOS 8, it is because Apple is a smartly run business that knows it can't afford to keep around older technology past its prime. Apple could have kept the iPhone 2G and iPod Touch current when they released iOS 4, but they knew it would not have been worth the developers' time or cost to maintain it. Same goes for the iPad 1 and iPod Touch 3 with iOS 6 or the iPod Touch 4 and iOS 7. They are a business and the bottom line is always profit. If they continue to maintain the older devices, what is the incentive to upgrade to something newer? The old aged A4 based iPod Touch 4 was in the Apple Store selling as new up to one week before the announcement of iOS 7. The iPad 2's recent discontinuation is irrelevant as such. As said before, the upper limit for iOS is seven versions. I have put forth a good reasoning behind that statement, while you have yet to backup your statement of no upper limit. Elementary economics are able to suffice that there must always be an upper limit to software support. iOS 7 does not require 512MB of memory. Case in point, the Apple TV 2. While not the same, it does irrefutably run iOS 7 as determined by its kernel, apps, frameworks, and processes. The iPhone 5s' perceived memory problems were caused by buggy 64-bit processes that take up slightly more memory and causing crashes. When comparing the iPod Touch 4's software support cycle to that of the iPad 2, its internal hardware is not part of the equation. Their entry date to the market, removal from market, and amount of iOS versions are. Nothing more, nothing less. Taking all of that into intelligent thought, you'll see how the two devices are very similar. More so than the iPad 2 and 3, when used in the same equation. Mostly because the iPad 3 is not on its final iOS version and was an oddball mid-cycle release that had a short market life, as far as iOS devices go. While the iPad 2 is not the slowest A5 device, that's the iPhone 4S or Apple TV 3, it certainly isn't the fastest. The iPad 3 or iPad Mini would be the fastest. They're die shrunk and have a slightly faster memory bus speed. Most iPad 2's would be roughly in the middle for computational abilities and falling short on memory availability and graphical abilities.
 
For COMPLETE use of iOS 8? Not iPhone 4, iPad 2 & iPad Mini 1st. Gen.
 
Speculation is half the fun of MacRumors, after all. So, with that in mind, I'd like to pose the following question:

Odds are pretty good that devices running the Apple A7 chip and shipping with iOS 7 (such as the iPhone 5S, the iPad Air, and the iPad mini with Retina Display) as well as the devices that shipped with either the A6 or A6X (such as the iPhone 5, iPhone 5C, and Fourth Generation iPad) are going to be able to run iOS 8. We can all safely agree on that, right?

That being said, the A5/A5X devices are not quite as clear. So, I pose the following. Which of the iOS devices not mentioned above that are currently able to run iOS 7 be unable to run iOS 8? For those playing the home game, this includes the following devices:

- iPhone 4
- iPhone 4S
- iPad 2
- Third Generation iPad
- First Generation iPad mini
- Fifth Generation iPod touch

(In the above poll, vote for which devices WON'T make the cut.)

Personally, I'm thinking that the iPad 2 is out. The iPhone 4 is also a no-brainer. I'd say that the third generation iPad with its A5X and (more importantly) 1GB of RAM (whereas the others only have 512MB) is in, but this is its last major iOS release. The fifth Generation iPod touch and first generation iPad mini, I feel, could go either way. if I had to guess something, it'd be that the first generation iPad mini doesn't get support, but the fifth generation iPod touch does; either that or neither do. The iPhone 4S is a similarly tough call; but I think that Apple will let it in, simply because they have a history of letting in much older iPhones than they do contemporary iPads and iPod touches.

What say you?

! Apple **** hate iPod touch ! Always get a 1 iOS update only ! Why ?
! ! Look to the iPod 4 (same iPhone 4 CPU and RAM) ,, iPhone 4 can run iOS 7
iPod 4 can not :"-(
So I think that iPod 5 won't got iOS 8 !

I think that
- iPhone 4
- iPhone 4S (I am not sure)
- iPad 2
- iPod touch 5
- iPad mini
Will not run iOS 8
--------
But I guess that the iPad 3 can run iOS 8 with 1 GB RAM
& A5X
 
You're dead set in wanting iOS 8 on the iPad 2. There's no changing your mind. You'd probably even demand Apple to release it for the iPad 2 once it is announce at WWDC and the iPad 2 is not on the list of supported devices.

My mind can be changed, if you actually had some ground. Right now, what you're saying isn't enough to convince me that you're right. You are using Touch 4 and the first editions of the devices as an example and that isn't enough.

A trend is a general direction in which something is developing or changing. The iPhone 4 is currently following step for step in those of the 3Gs. Thus, creating a trend.

Yes I see the trend happening with only the iPhone 4. Not disagreeing with you there.

However this is where it stops. The iPhone 4 isn't the iPad 2. They don't share the same processor. So if iPhone 4 dies, it's because of the A4 chip can't handle the power of 8. The same CAN'T be said for iPad 2.


The iPad 1 and 2 have taken different directions and thus not a trend. The iPad 2 doesn't stand out anymore than the 3Gs or iPhone 4. All are older, now outdated technology.

Again, using "old". 3GS and 4 are on their last legs compared to iPad 2, period. That's the difference. Doesn't matter if it's OLD, if the components in the iPad is capable of running 8, it will get 8.

That does indeed struggle with some of iOS 7's things. Oh the fuss that was given when the iPad 1 was left behind at iOS 5 when the other A4 devices got iOS 6.

iPad 1 had 256MB of RAM with a bigger screen along with a single core processor. Touch 4 is a disaster on iOS 6, Apple had no choice though to upgrade it while only iPhone 4 had it smooth because of its 512MB of RAM. Made a huge difference.

It'll be that all over again, but this time with the iPad. So is the cost of having an iPad released in March with iOS being released in October. Most of the educational places that bulk bought iPad 2's through Apple's education sources did so under a lease type agreement with Apple that is good for only a few years. The earlier iPad 2's sold under such an agreement have already been replaced with iPad 4's. Hence why the iPad 4 was brought back to market.

And what about the schools that just bought the iPad 2's in bulk last year? Do they have to wait TWO years before their iPads get the latest update? Come on man, you must have saw this question coming.

People on these very forums have commented on how the iPad Mini and iPod Touch 5 are faster feeling than the iPad 2.

My brother has a 4s and iPad 2. Compared it, iPad 2 is like 0.1 slower than 4s on loading internal apps. You're making it like the iPad 2 has a terrible experience on iOS 7.

Could it be more of Apple's speed padding to make older devices appear slower or are really just that much slower than newer A5 devices? As far as memory restrictions go, in many threads on these forums people complain that the iPad 2 has hit its limits in terms of memory. It does have a higher base memory usage than other A5 devices.

Source please. Otherwise bull.

If it doesn't get iOS 8, it is because Apple is a smartly run business that knows it can't afford to keep around older technology past its prime.

What?! If that's true, then they should axe all A5 devices since they ALL went past their prime! Come on! Stop using it's "old" to say iPad 2 can't run iOS 8.

Apple could have kept the iPhone 2G and iPod Touch current when they released iOS 4, but they knew it would not have been worth the developers' time or cost to maintain it.

iPhone 2G and Touch would have struggled BIG time with the apps. iOS 4 required a certain amount of RAM on top with requiring space for the App Store's apps. If you are comparing these with iPhone 4 I would have understand, but iPad 2 which ISN'T struggling?

Same goes for the iPad 1 and iPod Touch 3 with iOS 6 or the iPod Touch 4 and iOS 7. They are a business and the bottom line is always profit.

Not enough RAM to handle those iOSes. iPad 1 again explained above.

If they continue to maintain the older devices, what is the incentive to upgrade to something newer?

They maintained/ing the 3GS, 4, 4s, iPad 2,3,4...these are ALL older devices. You have thrown the "3 iOS upgrade minimum" thing out of the window if you ask this question.

The old aged A4 based iPod Touch 4 was in the Apple Store selling as new up to one week before the announcement of iOS 7.

Apple knew it can't run iOS 7 due to 256MB of RAM it had...along with the single core A4 chip. Replaced it eitherly with (OMG!) iPad 2's brother!

The iPad 2's recent discontinuation is irrelevant as such. As said before, the upper limit for iOS is seven versions. I have put forth a good reasoning behind that statement, while you have yet to backup your statement of no upper limit.

It's simply because I don't understand you. iPad 2 hasn't got 7 versions.

iOS 7 does not require 512MB of memory. Case in point, the Apple TV 2. While not the same, it does irrefutably run iOS 7 as determined by its kernel, apps, frameworks, and processes.

Well if Touch 4 can run Apple TV's iOS 7 software then that's cool...you have a point, otherwise, please.

Bottom line for portable, touch-screen iOS devices, to run iOS 7 the requirement is 512MB. Banging my head on the table that you USING Apple TV as an example. It's even worse for a comparison than Touch 4!

The iPhone 5s' perceived memory problems were caused by buggy 64-bit processes that take up slightly more memory and causing crashes.

Okay, what about the 5/5c then? Still slow as heck on iOS 7.x.x.

When comparing the iPod Touch 4's software support cycle to that of the iPad 2, its internal hardware is not part of the equation. Their entry date to the market, removal from market, and amount of iOS versions are. Nothing more, nothing less. Taking all of that into intelligent thought, you'll see how the two devices are very similar. More so than the iPad 2 and 3, when used in the same equation. Mostly because the iPad 3 is not on its final iOS version and was an oddball mid-cycle release that had a short market life, as far as iOS devices go. While the iPad 2 is not the slowest A5 device, that's the iPhone 4S or Apple TV 3, it certainly isn't the fastest. The iPad 3 or iPad Mini would be the fastest. They're die shrunk and have a slightly faster memory bus speed. Most iPad 2's would be roughly in the middle for computational abilities and falling short on memory availability and graphical abilities.

I'm---trying to find the point here is to why iPad 2 isn't getting 8. It's not the slowest (but not the fastest---okay) the devices that are slower than iPad 2 will get 8, but iPad 2 will be left out in the cold because it's "old". Probably like 4-5 months older than 4s.
 
Which Devices Won't Make the Cut for iOS 8?

Because iPad 2 came out before 4s and Siri came out along with 4s.

Siri was at the time an exclusive feature for the 4s.

I'm sure iPad 2 can run Siri fine, but this is Apple stripping features to get more money.



Exactly. That is why I can see the Mini getting iOS 8 while the iPad 2 does not.


I agree with these. Apple wanted people to buy the iPhone 4s in order to get Siri.

----------

My mind can be changed, if you actually had some ground. Right now, what you're saying isn't enough to convince me that you're right. You are using Touch 4 and the first editions of the devices as an example and that isn't enough.



A trend is a general direction in which something is developing or changing. The iPhone 4 is currently following step for step in those of the 3Gs. Thus, creating a trend.



Yes I see the trend happening with only the iPhone 4. Not disagreeing with you there.



However this is where it stops. The iPhone 4 isn't the iPad 2. They don't share the same processor. So if iPhone 4 dies, it's because of the A4 chip can't handle the power of 8. The same CAN'T be said for iPad 2.









Again, using "old". 3GS and 4 are on their last legs compared to iPad 2, period. That's the difference. Doesn't matter if it's OLD, if the components in the iPad is capable of running 8, it will get 8.







iPad 1 had 256MB of RAM with a bigger screen along with a single core processor. Touch 4 is a disaster on iOS 6, Apple had no choice though to upgrade it while only iPhone 4 had it smooth because of its 512MB of RAM. Made a huge difference.







And what about the schools that just bought the iPad 2's in bulk last year? Do they have to wait TWO years before their iPads get the latest update? Come on man, you must have saw this question coming.







My brother has a 4s and iPad 2. Compared it, iPad 2 is like 0.1 slower than 4s on loading internal apps. You're making it like the iPad 2 has a terrible experience on iOS 7.







Source please. Otherwise bull.







What?! If that's true, then they should axe all A5 devices since they ALL went past their prime! Come on! Stop using it's "old" to say iPad 2 can't run iOS 8.







iPhone 2G and Touch would have struggled BIG time with the apps. iOS 4 required a certain amount of RAM on top with requiring space for the App Store's apps. If you are comparing these with iPhone 4 I would have understand, but iPad 2 which ISN'T struggling?







Not enough RAM to handle those iOSes. iPad 1 again explained above.







They maintained/ing the 3GS, 4, 4s, iPad 2,3,4...these are ALL older devices. You have thrown the "3 iOS upgrade minimum" thing out of the window if you ask this question.







Apple knew it can't run iOS 7 due to 256MB of RAM it had...along with the single core A4 chip. Replaced it eitherly with (OMG!) iPad 2's brother!







It's simply because I don't understand you. iPad 2 hasn't got 7 versions.







Well if Touch 4 can run Apple TV's iOS 7 software then that's cool...you have a point, otherwise, please.



Bottom line for portable, touch-screen iOS devices, to run iOS 7 the requirement is 512MB. Banging my head on the table that you USING Apple TV as an example. It's even worse for a comparison than Touch 4!







Okay, what about the 5/5c then? Still slow as heck on iOS 7.x.x.







I'm---trying to find the point here is to why iPad 2 isn't getting 8. It's not the slowest (but not the fastest---okay) the devices that are slower than iPad 2 will get 8, but iPad 2 will be left out in the cold because it's "old". Probably like 4-5 months older than 4s.[/QUOTE]

The principle of that is like with the software update for the iPod touch first generation I believe. You had to pay because with the iPod touch you pay once and that was it, but with the iphone, you have to pay monthly for the phone service. Same applies to the iPad.
 
Suffice it to say that while there's enough strong evidence to point to iPhone 4 not being included, there isn't as much strong evidence to point to iPad 2 like that. Although I'm suspecting it won't be included, it seems that it would be fair to say that so far no one car really say with high degree of probability that it will or won't be. Seems like arguing that point back and forth won't really move that probability one way or another until Apple actually makes their announcement.
 
If the iPad 3 gets it the 2 has to as well, as the 2 benchmarks higher than the 3 :p

That's correct, because they both have similar hardware and iPad 2 runs at a lower resolution. But we all know that real reason why they exclude some devices is not the performance the OS will have on them.
 
You're dead set in wanting iOS 8 on the iPad 2. There's no changing your mind. You'd probably even demand Apple to release it for the iPad 2 once it is announce at WWDC and the iPad 2 is not on the list of supported devices. A trend is a general direction in which something is developing or changing. The iPhone 4 is currently following step for step in those of the 3Gs. Thus, creating a trend. The iPad 1 and 2 have taken different directions and thus not a trend. The iPad 2 doesn't stand out anymore than the 3Gs or iPhone 4. All are older, now outdated technology. That does indeed struggle with some of iOS 7's things. Oh the fuss that was given when the iPad 1 was left behind at iOS 5 when the other A4 devices got iOS 6. It'll be that all over again, but this time with the iPad. So is the cost of having an iPad released in March with iOS being released in October. Most of the educational places that bulk bought iPad 2's through Apple's education sources did so under a lease type agreement with Apple that is good for only a few years. The earlier iPad 2's sold under such an agreement have already been replaced with iPad 4's. Hence why the iPad 4 was brought back to market. People on these very forums have commented on how the iPad Mini and iPod Touch 5 are faster feeling than the iPad 2. Could it be more of Apple's speed padding to make older devices appear slower or are really just that much slower than newer A5 devices? As far as memory restrictions go, in many threads on these forums people complain that the iPad 2 has hit its limits in terms of memory. It does have a higher base memory usage than other A5 devices. If it doesn't get iOS 8, it is because Apple is a smartly run business that knows it can't afford to keep around older technology past its prime. Apple could have kept the iPhone 2G and iPod Touch current when they released iOS 4, but they knew it would not have been worth the developers' time or cost to maintain it. Same goes for the iPad 1 and iPod Touch 3 with iOS 6 or the iPod Touch 4 and iOS 7. They are a business and the bottom line is always profit. If they continue to maintain the older devices, what is the incentive to upgrade to something newer? The old aged A4 based iPod Touch 4 was in the Apple Store selling as new up to one week before the announcement of iOS 7. The iPad 2's recent discontinuation is irrelevant as such. As said before, the upper limit for iOS is seven versions. I have put forth a good reasoning behind that statement, while you have yet to backup your statement of no upper limit. Elementary economics are able to suffice that there must always be an upper limit to software support. iOS 7 does not require 512MB of memory. Case in point, the Apple TV 2. While not the same, it does irrefutably run iOS 7 as determined by its kernel, apps, frameworks, and processes. The iPhone 5s' perceived memory problems were caused by buggy 64-bit processes that take up slightly more memory and causing crashes. When comparing the iPod Touch 4's software support cycle to that of the iPad 2, its internal hardware is not part of the equation. Their entry date to the market, removal from market, and amount of iOS versions are. Nothing more, nothing less. Taking all of that into intelligent thought, you'll see how the two devices are very similar. More so than the iPad 2 and 3, when used in the same equation. Mostly because the iPad 3 is not on its final iOS version and was an oddball mid-cycle release that had a short market life, as far as iOS devices go. While the iPad 2 is not the slowest A5 device, that's the iPhone 4S or Apple TV 3, it certainly isn't the fastest. The iPad 3 or iPad Mini would be the fastest. They're die shrunk and have a slightly faster memory bus speed. Most iPad 2's would be roughly in the middle for computational abilities and falling short on memory availability and graphical abilities.

And for some strange reason you're dead set against the iPad 2 being updated. There is a massive difference between iOS 7 on the iPad 2 and iOS 6 on the 3GS / iOS 7 on the iPhone 4. Massive massive massive. I also happen to own all three so I know. The iPad 2 runs iOS 7 quite well

Stop bringing the iPad 1 into it. It sucked with iOS 5. The iPad 2 does not suck with iOS 7.

Also the iPad 2 is faster than those other A5 device in terms of processing power. Notice that the 4S and iPod 5 get 215 in the benchmark, yet the iPad 2 gets 262. There is no reason for it to be dropped. Did you look a the link i posted earlier? As of October 2013, 38 percent of iPad users used the iPad 2. Thats more than the iPad 2 and 3 combined. Yes that was a while ago, but don't expect it to have changed that much, given that Apple says a large amount of tablet upgrades are from ex android users.. e.g. people aren't upgrading that quickly.

Also WRONG. The iPad 2 benchmarks higher than both the Mini and the 3. Marginally yes, but it is faster. The iPhone 4 is past its prime, but the iPad 2 is not, and it comes down to Apple cutting cost corners and keeping it and other A5 devices in production for so long. If Apple drops it, my gosh there will be angry people in the masses.
 
The "no longer on sale" part really doesn't matter all that much and I'm surprised to see so many people citing it for their reasoning. Internal tech specs tend to be the primary factor; though I'll never know why the iPhone 3GS got iOS 6 and the third gen iPod touch didn't when the latter had faster internals than the former.

You just answered your own question. The iPhone 3GS was still being sold and it got iOS 6. The iPod touch was no longer being sold and did not get iOS 6.

The only exception is the iPad 3, but the iPad 3 is an unusual device because of its exceptionally short lifespan. It didn't get an extended life at $399 like the iPad 2 and 4 did.

Which is still substantially shorter of a support lifespan than its successor product got.

It was shorter than the iPad 2 but it still got two major upgrades. No iOS device has ever gotten just one. The iPad mini will not be cut, Apple has so many A5 devices in its line up that it will be compelled to support them whether they run it well or not.
 
First off, I like this thread and the discussion that has sprung up from it. It's all interesting conjecture and it'll be fun to see how right or wrong we all are about the iOS support fate of our A5/A5X iOS devices. This all being said, I think it is useful to clarify on a couple facts that I've seen mis-represented a few times:

1. The fourth generation iPod touch:

- was sold through May of last year when it was replaced by the 16GB front-camera-less variant of the iPod touch.

- Shipped with iOS 4 when it first debuted, then 5 when the iPhone 4S came out and when the white version was released, then 6 through its discontinuation.

- Was prohibited from running iOS 7 presumably (as this is all but confirmed by Apple themselves) due to it only having 256MB of RAM as opposed to the 512+MB that all of the allowed devices (iPhone 4 included) had.


2. The third generation iPad:

- Came with 1GB of RAM on/in its A5X as opposed to the 512MB in every other A5-based device

- Supposedly has 7 times faster the graphics capability of the A5 (so sayeth Apple)

- This is evened out by the retina display (theorized)

- Was discontinued when the fourth generation iPad came out in October 2012

- Was allowed to run iOS 7


3. Fourth Generation iPad:

- Was discontinued with the release of the iPad Air, then the 16GB model was re-released to replace the aging iPad 2 which was not selling well

- Has the A6X, presumably as big of a leap in performance from the A5X as the A6 was from the A5


4. iPad 2:

- Does not have certain other features not related to processor that most newer A5 devices have (such as: retina display, Bluetooth 4.0, higher-resolution cameras, Siri [which could be due to a difference in the audio system], and similar others)


5. iOS Updates:

- Not historically determined by whether or not the device was sold by Apple at the time or even during the year in which the new OS was announced (case in point: original iPhone and first gen iPod touch with iOS 3, second gen iPod touch with iOS 4, third gen iPod touch and first gen iPad with iOS 5, third gen iPad with iOS 7. It DOES happen from time to time.

- Typically disallowed for a certain device when it can't run it well enough to have an enjoyable experience (though why the 3GS got iOS 6 and the third gen touch didn't when the latter had faster internals is a bit mysterious)


6. iOS 8:

- It being merely an optimization update (a la Snow Leopard) is an unconfirmed rumor and here-say

- No one knows any concrete details about it; its inevitability is universally assumed



That all being said:


Given iOS 8 isn't looking to be much different, there is no reason for it to run badly on the iPad 2. The iPad is very very similar to the 4S, the Mini 1 and the touch 5. In fact its got a faster processor than the 4S/Touch 5 plus it has less pixels to push. Given that Apple are almost certainly going to support the 4S/Touch 5 considering neither have reached their 'os support limit' plus the fact they both run iOS 7 well there would be no technical reason whatsoever for it not to run on the iPad 2.

First off, we don't know anything for sure about iOS 8. Secondly, there are plenty of hardware features present on newer iOS devices that are left out of the iPad 2. Third, Apple has often dropped support for technologies that have enough muscle to run certain software but require additional work to maintain that support. Case in point: Rosetta in Lion, Legacy BIOS support in the new Mac Pro (which prohibits it from running anything older than Windows 8 in Boot Camp). Apple could easily decide that it is dropping support for the iPad 2's screen resolution in the OS and stock apps. They could easily do the same with the iPhone 4S, though I think that'd be a tad bigger of a mistake given the (presumably) greater number of 4S users out there.

While yes the iPad 1 was pushing less pixels than the iPod touch 4, the iPod was supported because Apple continued selling it. Same with the 3GS. Plus both would have had respectable market shares at the time. In this case the iPad 2 is pushing less pixels than all the other A5 devices besides the Mini 1.

First off, iOS 5 on the first generation iPad was and still is horrible. I still have mine around and it's barely usable. iOS 5 was fine on a fourth generation iPod touch. Odds are, that's what determined the latter getting iOS 6 more than anything. Secondly, the first generation iPad mini is pushing the SAME number of pixels as the iPad 2, there is just a higher density of them. That being said, while the processors between the two are similar, there are plenty of other technologies that set the two apart.

Exactly! There is very little difference. I believe that the iPad 2/3/Mini 1 run at 1 GHZ , where as the iPod Touch 5/4S run at 800 Mhz. Essentially, the iPad 2 has more grunt, and no retina display meaning less energy to be spent! The iPad 3 has a better graphics chip (The A5X) than the 2, but the advantage of this is completely swallowed by the Retina display.

Again, if any non-A5X A5 device is to survive, then the ones that don't will likely be due to features not pertinent to the processor and the iPad 2's lack of them.


The iPod touch 3 was pretty much the same as the 3GS... from what I understood the 3GS was a little better? The 3GS got iOS 6 because it was sold right up until the iPhone 6 launch. Apple don't drop devices they are still selling. Plus the 3GS actually ran iOS 6 well, better than the iPod Touch 4.

Nope, the third generation iPod touch was actually faster than the 3GS. One of the few times that the touch was faster than its contemporary iPhone model.

Apple HASN'T dropped OS support for devices it is selling at the time of announcement, but I don't believe that they are opposed to this. I think for iPhones, it is in the EULA, but I could be wrong.

And what exactly is the difference between 4s, iPod Touch (5th), iPad 2, iPad 3 and mini (1st gen) apart from 4s, Touch has retina display and screen size? Almost zilch.

iPad 3 has 1GB of RAM, the others have 512MB. Also better graphics than the others.

iPad 3 and first gen mini, 4S, and 5th gen iPod touch have Bluetooth 4, 2 has 2.1.

First gen mini and 5th gen iPod touch have whatever wireless hardware feature gives them both AirDrop, the others don't. Also lightning connectors; though that is unlikely to matter.



The iPad 2 is still a beast even though it's old. That's why it's still capable of running iOS 7 today.

Great for 2011, even good for 2012. It is definitely showing its age in 2014; though it has aged FAR more gracefully than its predecessor.

Apple stops giving iOS major upgrades to devices when they are NOT capable of running it. If iOS 8 requires 512MB just like iOS 7, it shouldn't have any problem at all. It's rumoured that iOS 8 isn't that much different than 7 anyway!

(a) That's an unconfirmed rumor that's mostly here-say anyway. (b) RAM may not be the only factor at play here. It's hard to say, hence this thread! :)

4s, mini (1st gen), iPod Touch (5th), iPad 2 and iPad 3 can't be all axed by Apple for this upgrade. It's way too soon for most of these devices. They just brought iPad 3 back on sale for peaksake, and it's slower than iPad 2 with iOS 7.

You have to figure that the 4 runs 7 pretty slowly. Just like the 3GS ran 6 pretty slowly. The 4S will probably do the same with 8, and the 5th gen touch is more or less the same device in terms of raw power. the iPad 2 and first gen iPad mini already run 7 slowly, though not that slowly. Therein lies what makes this topic interesting.

That said, yes, the fifth gen iPod touch is still newer than the fourth generation was when it was finally cut off from new major iOS releases; but Apple hasn't historically shown the iPod touch line the best of care. Similarly, most first generation iOS devices aren't shown the best of love and care by comparison to their successors. The first generation iPad was lousy with this, and with the first generation iPad mini one full hardware generation behind in terms of processing power OUT OF THE GATE, it's not unlikely that Apple will push this one to the curb sooner than they do its retina-laden successor.

Again iPad 3 is back on sale. The iPad 3 will still be on sale when 8 is announced. iPad 2 was on sale several months ago. iPad 2 runs faster than 3 on iOS 7 and runs decently. It's not struggling with the OS.

The only iOS 7 device that looks like it's on its last legs is iPhone 4.

As I said if the A5 devices don't get 8, then it's simply because Apple is greedy and disgusting. Not because they struggle.

The A5 chip is dated compared to A6 and A7, but it's more powerful than you think.

It wouldn't be a matter of Apple being greedy as much as it would be about them not wanting to spend money and time on the resources to build in compatibility for those devices. Coding in for the resolutions for the iPad 2 and the first gen iPad mini might be an expense that they wish to avoid. Just like it'll be easier for them to also not support the iPhone 4S's resolution anymore when that time comes. As it stands, I'm sure it was helpful when they stopped supporting non-retina 3.5" screens. That's just one example, I'm sure there are others and I'm sure that'll be why the iPad 2 is left behind where others are given a stay of execution. Though I sort of hope they aren't; I'd rather be on an outdated OS that runs smoothly than a newer one that doesn't.

Why does the mini have Siri, but the iPad 2 does not?

Probably for reasons that have nothing to do with the processor. My guess is that they improved the audio in the 4S, third gen iPad, iPad mini, and fifth generation iPod touch.

If the iPad 3 gets iOS 8, I don't think it will run it particularly well. My iPad 3 runs iOS 7 well enough, but not perfect.

The 1GB of RAM may save it. Hard to tell though. That's why I included it in the poll.

No...

There is a difference between stripping features and giving iOS upgrades.

Besides most schools and unis have iPad 2s and Apple would have to support these especially iPad 2 was still on sale just a few months ago.

3GS and Touch 4 were no longer on sale when 5 and Touch 5 came out, but still received iOS 6.

(And you could tell iOS 6 will be its last, it struggled as heck. If iPad 2 iOS 7 owners think their tablet is "struggling" they have seen nothing)

First off, Apple has released security updates to the fourth generation iPod touch and iPhone 3GS in the form of exclusive versions of iOS 6. They could easily do the same with iOS 7 on the iPad 2. Secondly, there are a lot of iPad 2's out there in service not on 7 yet. It's possible that EDUs haven't made the switch yet. Even so though, odds are they'll soon be swapped for fourth generation iPads and iPad Airs.

Explain iPad 3 then. Axed before iOS 7 was announced, yet still got it.

If ANY A5 device supports 8, iPad 2 would join the supported list. So would the rest of the A5 family.

Could I say iOS 8 would be iPad 2's last? Yes. But it's far too early for iPad 2 to be axed from upgrades when it was literally on sale months ago.

The fact that it was on sale months ago means nothing. Apple has discontinued devices months before disallowing them from the iOS release announced at WWDC.

I'm pretty sure the iPhone 4 will be dropped from iOS 8. The iPhone 4s I think will still be included, unless it is discontinued with an 8GB 5c in the coming month (before WWDC). The iPad 2 I'm 70% certain won't receive iOS 8 as it was discounted at the same time the iPod touch 4th Gen was last year (few months before WWDC). The 5th Gen Touch may run iOS 8. Anything A6 or newer will more then likely supported. A7 I know will be supported.

The 8GB 5C could've been a way out for Apple for iPhone 4S support. It's odd that this release didn't happen here and that it didn't replace the 4S. That would've made things easier for all parties, Apple included.

Id love to see 3.5 screens gone but I think theres another year til that dream happens =/

It would make things simpler for Apple if they dropped it. Same if they dropped support for non-retina iPad 2/iPad mini screens. As it stands, they now support 4 different resolution of screens.

And there is something wrong of making it the first to break that barrier?

There is a reason why iPad 2 was on sale for SO long. Because while it was cheaper to produce for Apple, it is a BEAST of a tablet for its age. And it still is. It's only MONTHS older than 4s. And I guarantee you 4s will get 8.

So unless Apple wants to smell money from their own farts for the 1st time regarding iOS upgrades, there is no way iPad 2 is missing out on 8.

I don't think it'd be all that egregious a move for them. It is an older tablet lacking in multiple features that newer devices now have.
 
We can flip that argument to be about the iPod Touch 4. Is there something wrong about it being the first iPod Touch to get four versions of iOS?

Well, no, aside from the fact that it wasn't the first major iPod touch to get four versions of iOS as its first OS was iOS 4 and its last was iOS 6.


Except the Touch 4 has a single core A4 processor and 256MB of RAM (compared to iPhone 4's 512MB). Cannot run iOS 7 as it requires 512MB. If Touch 4 had 512MB, it would have the upgrade to 7.

iPad 1 was not designed to be futureproof. Same with iPod Touch 1. And by the way these are the first versions of the devices you are comparing to.

iPad 2 was futureproof. That's why it lasts so long and running along side its small brothers.

Doesn't matter if "other" iPads and Android tablets have better components than iPad 2. If iPad 2 meets the requirements for iOS 8, then it WILL get it.

And it's most likely WILL meet that requirement, since all A5 devices have the same chip and RAM size.

No computer is future-proof, period. Also, the CPU may only be one factor in what makes the cut or not, as Apple has been known to deny OS updates to devices/computers that have enough processing muscle to run it but lack certain features for whatever reason; likely because it costs more time/money/resources than they see fit to spend. What we can likely say is that if the iPad 2 is not supported but the other A5 devices are, then the experience on those devices will suck.

There are other iOS 7 devices that are single core and have only 256MB of ram, see Apple TV 2 and 3.

The iPad 1 has same internals as the iPod Touch 4. No reason why it shouldn't have gotten iOS 6. Just like the iPod Touch 1 and iPhone 2G have the same exact CPU/GPU/RAM down to the bootrom as the iPhone 3G, but didn't get iOS 4.

The iPad 2 was not futureproof, nothing is. It was more futureresistant than the iPad 1, but not futureproof. Its resistance to the future got it a fourth version of iOS, instead of the iPad 1's three versions.

You know very well that Apple doesn't play by the "if the device meets the requirements for it, it gets it" rule. Examples: Siri, iOS 4 on iPhone 2G and iPod Touch 1, iOS 6 on iPad 1 and iPod Touch 3, blur animations in iOS 7 on iPhone 4, taking photo when recording video on iPhone 4S, AirDrop, turn by turn navigation, flyover...

You're looking at it from the standpoint that the CPU is the end all be all. And sure, it probably is for most elements, but clearly it wasn't for Siri/Voice-Recognition, or AirDrop for that matter. I'm not sure why the iOS 6 didn't go on the first gen iPad but it did on the fourth generation iPod touch, but then again, I'm also at a loss as to why iOS 5 ran like crap on the former, but not the latter. Might be correlated. Probably is.

But Apple TV and other iOS devices are not comparable. They have a totally different UI, apps, navigations...



Then what you said completely nullifies on what you said about iPad 3. Doesn't matter if it had 2 iOS versions, it was no longer been sold therefore it was no need for Apple to upgrade its OS.

But Apple did it anyway and why? Because it meets the requirements for iOS 7. iPad 2 and 3 will both meet the requirements for 8 if the 2 A5s that are still on sale gets it.

And what are you talking about that the iPad 1 has a better processor than iPhone4/Touch4? They all share the same processor (A4) and only the iPhone 4 has 512MB! No WAY the iPad 1 was king against its A4 family.

Yes Apple were forced to make Touch 4 on iOS 6 because it was still on sale. And like I said, huge mistake! It was barely usable. And before you go all out and say, "So would the iPad 2 on iOS 8", it shares the SAME processor and RAM with the A5 family. Hardly any difference. It's even non-retina! If it struggles so HARD, then the rest will therefore all of the family will not get the upgrade to 8.

Again, the "still on sale" argument doesn't necessarily hold 100%. The fourth generation iPod touch likely got iOS 6 where the first generation iPad didn't because iOS 5 ran decently on the former and terribly on the latter. Why that was, I don't know, but there's probably a technical reason for it.



That was early days. Things have changed. Apple today brags about the adaption rate for iOS 7. They want most devices to upgrade to the latest OS as possible. If iPad 2 (which AGAIN was only sold months ago, that is THIS year 2014) can upgrade to 8 with no problems, they would.

They can't abandon iPad 2. For goodness sake, have you forgotten about Applecare and the other policies? There are people OUT THERE who bought the iPad 2 this year. And you think Apple will abandon those who just got it in less in a year?!

To be honest, I should have just used this reason why it's getting 8. That reason alone is why it's 100% getting 8.

AppleCare has nothing in it about OS updates. Also: you can buy AppleCare for Apple Certified Refurbished products, and it is through there that you can buy discontinued iOS devices among other things. Also, there are enough iOS customers that DON'T have an iPad 2 and will still get to iOS 8.


far fewer people had iPod touch 4th gens at the time... The iPad 2 has a high user base still. Plus the iPod Touch 4 ran iOS 5 and 6 terribly. The iPad 2 ran iOS 6 very well and runs OS 7 quite well.

If the iPad 3 gets it the 2 has to as well, as the 2 benchmarks higher than the 3 :p

By a marginal amount. Even so, support there will likely be determined by features that don't pertain to the processing core but rather RAM, graphics, and/or other hardware components that Apple may or may not want to drop support for (such as non-retina displays).

All that Apple needs is the device's age, whether it is still being sold, and what iOS versions it currently supports. The iPad 2 is the oldest, is no longer sold, and has four versions. The iPad 3 is not as old, is no longer sold, but only has three versions. Following the trend of the iPad 2, it'll get iOS 8. The iPad Mini 1 is still being sold and only has two versions of iOS. Following the trend of every other iOS device, it'll at least get iOS 8 and possibly 9. The idea of one not being able to support iOS 8 is a simple idea from the uninformed public's mindset. 3 is greater than 2. Thus, the iPad 3 is "better" to them and will likely support iOS 8. Limitations don't mean anything to Apple. Look at Siri, the iPad 2 can run it, but never got it. Look at the limitations of its devices. The iPhone 3G and iPod Touch 2 have iOS 4 and it runs horribly on them, but Apple forced it on anyways. Apple isn't about forcing device refreshes. If it was they'd disable all older iOS devices or give them a hard set limit of only two iOS versions.



It makes very good sense to not include the iPhone 4, but to include the 4S. The 4S is much more powerful in nearly every aspect. The time the iPad 2 was last sold is irrelevant. See iPod Touch 4 as an example.

For all you or anyone else knows, Siri was unsupported on the iPad 2 for a lesser known component difference. Odds are that's the case. The newer iOS devices than the iPad 2 do have hardware features that the iPad 2 does not.

I think every device with a 30 pin is toast.

This certainly brings up an interesting theory and point. It might be easier for Apple to just drop support for certain devices this way and for no reason other than to simplify development. I don't think they'll do it by connector type, but who knows. They did base versions of OS X on whether or not computers had USB or FireWire ports in the distant past.

If iOS 8 requires 1GB of RAM, not only 5s, 5, 5c and recent iPads will start crashing a lot due to lack of RAM...

...but all A5 devices will be axed. That includes the (yep) iPad 2, iPad 3, iPhone 4s, iPod Touch (5th) and Mini (1st gen).

However seriously? I don't think iOS 8 will require 1GB of RAM. That virtually destroys the devices that are on sale now including the 5s!

I don't think it'll require that much RAM either. But I also don't think it'd destroy A6/A6X/A7 devices if it did.

Apple would not axe any of the 3 A5 devices it sells at the moment, and they all have 512 MB of ram. Also iOS 8 is predicted to be a small update, thus I think 512 MB with dual core A5 will be the minimum.

That's here-say. Again, odds are the processor won't be the cut-off, though I'm sure it's only a matter of time before the A5 is universally too old.

The one year warranty is for hardware, not as much for software. On the software side of it, the iPod Touch 4 did get some updates to fix some problems within one year after is was removed from sale. It's possible that the iPad 2 could get an iOS 7.1.2 or 7.1.3 update to fix some problems as was done with the iPod Touch 4. The iPad 3 got the next version of iOS because it has not fulfilled its iOS version requirements. Simple as that. Apple does have an upper limit to iOS version support as limited by the device's hardware lifecycle. The most they could get is N+6 versions of iOS for a maximum of 7 versions. I'm not implying that the iPad limit is three. Only that the iPod and early iPhone limit is that. We, being the public, do not yet know the iOS support limit for iPads, iPad Minis, and iOS based Apple TVs. In graphical benchmarking tests, the iPad 3 runs just as well, if not better than, the iPad 2. When comparing an iOS 4 or iOS 5 iPad 1 and iPhone 4, the iPhone is nearly always slower at loading things which is where the majority of iOS' perceived sluggishness comes from. Because of this, the iPad 1 is a faster device to use on iOS 4 or 5. Why should I stop using the iPod Touch 4 as an example? It fits very well in to this pattern, with or without knowing its constraints. Apple doesn't care much for the lack of memory. The iPhone 3G and iPod Touch 2G only had 128MB, but they got iOS 4. It run horridly, but it ran. No reason why Apple couldn't trim off some features and wedge it onto there or cram iOS 6 onto an iPad 1.



Not all A5 devices will be killed off if iOS 8 requires 1GB of memory. The iPad 3 will get it as it has 1GB of memory. Putting in such a requirement would not sit well for the general public as the iPhone 4S is still on sale and the past two iPhones previous have gotten four versions of iOS. It would also not fulfill the iPad Mini 1 and iPod Touch 5's requirement of at least three versions of iOS.

I don't believe that is still a requirement. If it was, fourth generation iPod touches sold with iOS 6 pre-loaded would not have this requirement met.
 
Suffice it to say that while there's enough strong evidence to point to iPhone 4 not being included, there isn't as much strong evidence to point to iPad 2 like that. Although I'm suspecting it won't be included, it seems that it would be fair to say that so far no one car really say with high degree of probability that it will or won't be. Seems like arguing that point back and forth won't really move that probability one way or another until Apple actually makes their announcement.

Again, this is why it's a good topic for debate. Apple has historically left features out that had little to do with the CPU; though it is unclear if they will ever do so for the whole OS.


You just answered your own question. The iPhone 3GS was still being sold and it got iOS 6. The iPod touch was no longer being sold and did not get iOS 6.

I don't buy that. But okay.

The only exception is the iPad 3, but the iPad 3 is an unusual device because of its exceptionally short lifespan. It didn't get an extended life at $399 like the iPad 2 and 4 did.

That device had a short lifespan for a ton of reasons, all of them logical. (1) Coming out with a device in February-April would give it 6-8 months shorter of a lifespan and have it behind the curve come fall when the new A processor came out. (2) That device wasn't as powerful as it needed to be (hence it being similar in terms of power to the iPad 2) and it had all sorts of battery and/or charging issues. (3) A6X was available faster than A5X was at the time. (4) Lightning connector. So forth. It made sense, and thankfully it's looking like they've figured it out so that the iPads launch in Fall and last a year before being upgraded while still lasting as long of a while as possible.



It was shorter than the iPad 2 but it still got two major upgrades. No iOS device has ever gotten just one. The iPad mini will not be cut, Apple has so many A5 devices in its line up that it will be compelled to support them whether they run it well or not.

Apple has set bad precedents like that. The discontinuation of an iOS device months before news breaks from Apple at WWDC that it won't run the next iOS was a trend that started last year with the fourth generation iPod touch and appears to be continuing again this year with the iPad 2. The iPad mini also shipped out the gate being one year behind both the iPhone 5 and the fourth generation iPad, leaving both it and the first generation iPod touch stuck with 2011 tech under the hood.

Realistically this is probably because the A6 was a hotter running and less efficient chip than A7, but still, this doesn't change that A5 is still a generation slower than A6 and two slower than A7. From this, we can assume that the first generation iPad mini will last shorter as a product than the second generation (retina) iPad mini given that in one year it will have jumped two generations. Though I do agree, only one update is too short and a nasty precedent for Apple to set; though totally in line with the OS update timetable of all of the iPad mini's competitor products.
 
Is everyone still ignoring the fact that the iPad 2 has a massive user base...

People don't upgrade their iPads like they upgrade their iPhones. The iPad is showing to be more like the Mac, e.g. people will hang onto them longer, due to the fact they are unsubsidised. If you realise your iPad 2 can't get the latest upgrade after only 2 or less years, I doubt you're going to buy another iPad.

Also the 4S is certain to be supported given that it

1. it runs iOS 7 very well
2. it is still sold
3. it hasn't received its 3rd update yet

If the iPhone 4S is supported, there is no reason for the 2 not to be supported given that the iPhone 4S is almost identical in all ways, besides the fact that it runs slower benchmark wise. I'm pretty sure that the iPad 2 is technically capable of Siri (As jail breakers have shown) but Apple introduced Siri for the iPad with iOS 6, and it old have been a selling point for the iPad 4 to get people to upgrade from the iPad 2 and 1.

People seem obsessed with Apple dropping their middle aged and perfectly capable devices. There is no reason for Apple to Drop any of the A5 devices. Apple have been greedy and continued selling these devices, and they should thus support them.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.