Kaby Lake was only released few months ago. How do you imagine they should have used a CPU that didn't exist?
Wrong, Was Released before the 2016 pro
Kaby Lake was only released few months ago. How do you imagine they should have used a CPU that didn't exist?
Kaby Lake was only released few months ago. How do you imagine they should have used a CPU that didn't exist?
Quality control
And failures
[doublepost=1496733151][/doublepost]
Of course, should started kaby from the start.
Wrong, Was Released before the 2016 pro
Wrong, Was Released before the 2016 pro
Agreed, unless the OP bought the machine on June 4th, there's no need to regret the purchase. Besides the update is a spec update, nothing major.Why would you ever regret buying anything? It will get outdated at some point anyway
Agreed, unless the OP bought the machine on June 4th, there's no need to regret the purchase. Besides the update is a spec update, nothing major.
There's no evidence that Apple is addressing those QC issues, so getting a 2017 model over the 16 doesn't address those issues you're having.Let me put it this way, Im currently Typing this on my trusty 2011 MBP, Due to my keyboard on my 16 once again locking up causing a reboot and it was easier picking up the draft email I was on this way.
There's no evidence that Apple is addressing those QC issues, so getting a 2017 model over the 16 doesn't address those issues you're having.
Regretting the MBP because of your issues, and those are frustrating, especially given the price of MBP, but the 2017 model may be no different. This is why I'm hesitant to buy a MBP. Speaking personally, I've been the between the horns of the dilemma of sticking with macOS and the Apple experience which I do not want to discount. I give Apple credit for creating a cohesive environment. Or switch to Windows which I use quite a bit for work. The quality of the keyboard is a major concern for me, given experiences such as yourself.
MY unofficial and informal experiences are similar as well. I've seen information out and about that similar. The 2016 seems to have some significant QC issues, which is one major reason why held off. I have no idea if the '17 model is any betterSadly my apple tech that comes into work has mentioned many times now how many 16's have failed... Daily he has repairs for boards and little things.. One of He's clients purchased 200, 160 of them have failed and been replaced / repaired.
Good luck, and press your issues with Apple (politely but firmly), they're generally good at seeing the frustrating and making good.Im at my wits end, if this does not get changed out for a 17 Ill keep it and sell it for a loss and buy a Lenovo or XPS Dell.
MY unofficial and informal experiences are similar as well. I've seen information out and about that similar. The 2016 seems to have some significant QC issues, which is one major reason why held off. I have no idea if the '17 model is any better![]()
, Good luck, and press your issues with Apple (politely but firmly), they're generally good at seeing the frustrating and making good.
Haha, I do not doubt it for a second.All those 2016 MBPs that you've taken back to the store will soon be reburbed units.
The next people who buy them will have zero issues with them.![]()
The best way to revenge Apple 2016 MBP owners, is to wait until 2025 to upgrade again.
So by contrast THIS version should have more not less issues than the one from 2016. If mine begins to fail I'll try and drag it out until Coffeelake for that reason
Sarcastic?I agree with you 100%. Theres no reason the 2016 or 2017 can't last 8-10 years. TB3 should be compatible with the new stuff that comes after it (keep in mind, TB1/2 to TB3 requires an adapter due to the signaling shift).
But that version/2018, whenever it is released could also have the new terraced batteries and who knows how that will go. I think it'll be fine since they have experience with the MacBook but still.
2015 and 2016 MBPs, Unite!Sarcastic?I agree with you 100%. Theres no reason the 2016 or 2017 can't last 8-10 years. TB3 should be compatible with the new stuff that comes after it (keep in mind, TB1/2 to TB3 requires an adapter due to the signaling shift).
But that version/2018, whenever it is released could also have the new terraced batteries and who knows how that will go. I think it'll be fine since they have experience with the MacBook but still.
Nobody (well, it seems judging from these forums) got what they expected (read: the moon) with these updates, no 32 Gb, no terraced batteries, price drop, extreme GPU upgrade. Everything was incremental as one could expect from Apple.
jesus,
That came at a big hit, way cheaper better performance and specs 6 months after the pro realease.... who else is feeling it like me... mines still in the 14 days again was replaced 4 times so thinking may do it again for the new one, what do you all think?
Personally I wouldn't feel bad if I were you. This isn't a big update. It was obvious this was coming as well. I was waiting for this but I'm left a bit disappointed as others have mentioned, by a lack of 32gb of ram.
Is it just me or does this seem super fake? This user has owned his Macbook for LESS than 14 days but has replaced it four times??? Unless you bought it stock that not physically possible, and moreover, its extremely unlikely in the first place; you really had 4 back to back failures in under 2 weeks...?