Oridus
macrumors 65816
Not trying to make a drawn out post.
Think of TouchID as if there was nothing to touch. Pretend like TouchID simply knows you when you pick up the phone.
That's it. You simply pick up the phone. This is a one step process.
Now FaceID. You have to pick up your phone, look at your phone, and swipe up. Three steps.
The reason why I ask you to forget that you are actually touching the TouchID button is because after a while of using the phone, the physical interaction of touching the button is integrated into the process of simply picking the phone up.
This is an analysis of physical interaction between the two technologies. One requires you to simply hold your phone while the other is a three step process which includes picking it up, physically placing it in front of your face, and then using your hand to gesture for unlock.
If we use the principle that any technology can improve by simplifying it's process, we can see that TouchID is actually the superior technology.
Strictly objective.
Subjectivity sometimes is influenced by naiveté in the particular subject being discussed. Not meant as an insult, but I believe this argument is premature, since the vast majority of us have no experience in how this actually feels.
Adding a particular physical interaction to replace another (or lack thereof) doesn't always mean we're regressing. We've gone kind of back and forth in our options to unlock the phone. First it was slide to unlock, then we had touch ID and with that came the option later on to "rest finger to open". In any of those manners though, we're moving our finger in some fashion to still induce the action of opening the phone. We had to be cognizant of where our thumb was placed to complete this action, therefor still performing a physical function that eventually came naturally inherent to our daily interaction with the device. Muscle memory. We no longer are burdened by the thought of this action as we use it on a daily basis. The same will happen with FaceID.
I personally believe that FaceID is 2 steps, as well. Not three as you mentioned. If you're pulling your phone out of your pocket, there's a very very good chance that you're going to be looking at the device to interaction with it anyway. There's very little in the way of situations that I can think of that you would pull your phone out of your pocket, unlock it, and not be looking at the phone for some piece of information. So two steps are involved. Pick up your phone, swipe up. I say that because while you're looking at the phone between picking it up and swiping, it's already going through the motions of the unlock. Heck, one could argue that this is really just one step, with the swipe up, because there's no arguing that in any case of interacting with your phone in the condition to where an unlock needs to happen (Via FaceID, TouchID, Passcode, or simple access to the home-screen with no lock code), you'll be picking up your phone anyway.
We simply, in my opinion, will become used to it, just as we have with TouchID, and it will become a very fluid motion as we use it on a day to day basis. You're breaking down a physical process into steps and making it sounds like they're rather large steps, when in reality we don't think of it when we're doing it. It feels like one task that we're completing in a fluid motion. I mean, lets be real, when you're breathing, do you think, "Okay, I have to breath in now. That's step one. Alright, step two, I've got to be ready to gauge when my lungs are full and I should start the exhale process. Alright, my lungs are full, exhale. Step four, I don't think I can exhale any more... we need to return to step one."? When you outline it like that, it sounds like this complicated process we've been inundated with, when in reality it's something that will require nothing more than muscle memory.
So while I agree with the subjective tone to the statement, I think we're over complicating a similarly simplistic process, if nothing more than for the reason that it's new, and we're unsure of it.
Last edited: