The problem with people using random numbers is that we'll probably just end up with 1 person with a 3 vote majority...
The problem with people using random numbers is that we'll probably just end up with 1 person with a 3 vote majority...
Not possible. You can't be voted off unless you hit majority, and majority is 11.
In that case, using the random number generator is pretty much a no-vote.
In that case, using the random number generator is pretty much a no-vote.
I disagree with that; I think it is a good way to get the ball rolling.
By posting a vote for someone in any way, random.org or otherwise, it gets the conversation started. We have to start somewhere, and this has proven in the past to be a decent way to do it.
I just mean if all 20 of us pick a random number from 1-20 the odds of 11 people getting the same random number in which a majority would be reached is pretty much non-existent. Hence it being a no-vote. Of course that implies everybody uses the random number generator.
Cause you couldn't have kept clicking it until 5 came up....![]()
I am voting for SilentPanda why because he is not voting. If he is a wolf he is hiding from us. If is a villager he needs to try to lead us.
Yeah cause everybody else is taking charge with the random number generator...
I'm a villager but whatever.
Hey I took charge in my vote.![]()
I'm not against people voting for me (except the whole "I'm a villager" bit)... the whole thing is a crapshoot especially at this point... heck my first few votes last game were pure junk reasons.
I'm not against people voting for me (except the whole "I'm a villager" bit)... the whole thing is a crapshoot especially at this point... heck my first few votes last game were pure junk reasons.
I'm just joking around. I thought my vote had humor in it. Guess it didn't stick. There isn't a logical method to voting the first round, it's a crap shoot.
Your vote (and everybody's) is fine.
I just hate first day voting... it takes a few days before I start caring.