Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Also they didn’t mentioned gear compatibility who major of pros use. Tangent control panel, Wacom Tablet, Audio Interface, and another peripheral such as portable HDD and USB sticks which need exFat format to able read both on Windows and MacOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
I'd say no, because of the architecture incompatibility. x86 to Apple Silicon would require a recompile for Bootcamp, let alone emulation inside Bootcamp for x86. So Bootcamp may be getting the boot (pun intended).

Now virtualization may save you, but native may be the issue.

BL.

There are ARM versions of pretty much every major OS in common use, including windows, no intrinsic reason why bootcamp would go away.
 
My favorite new feature of IOS 14 is in the Chinese version and that made me laugh.

You can just enter your license plate number and your iPhone will tell you if the government will allow you to visit the city! Aren't human rights so wonderful? :D
Whaaat? I didn't watch all of WWDC but I can't imagine they gave that a spotlight!
 
I think it might be a bit different this time. They aren't going to release new Intel Macs this year and then drop support for Intel in two years. They were quite vague about how long Intel would be supported, though. I would have preferred a solid commitment to supporting Intel Macs for "at least X years from the release of out first A-Series Macs."

Apple would never give a "solid commitment" to support X of years because that would draw out the transition.

Sure, new Intel iMacs will come out this year. Because people still need computers today to do work based on x86 programs. But that doesn't mean a $2,000 iMac will slow down the entire transition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
WWDC never looked and sounded this good..perfect lighting and smooth transitions without audience interruptions from their clapping and sheering.😊

Sorry but the transitions were VERY jumpy and jarring especially in the beginning. Maybe not for 120hz screens or 4K but for us on 1080p and 60hz still borderline seizure causing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Godspeed on your journey with heartfelt thoughts and prayers!
Thanks, I've been making the transition already for the last couple years. This is the final nail in the coffin of my hopes that Apple will ever make Macs again that I will care about. Mac OS has been the frog in the slowly boiling pot ever since the first iPhone came out, and it's clear Apple has every intention of forcing everyone into iOS and ditching Mac OS completely. Just look at Big Sur's new interface and the features they touted.

I'm actually a RISC fanboy so ARM doesn't scare me, but unless the whole rest of the industry ditches Intel, this is a dumb mistake and users will suffer for it.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: DinkThifferent
Lol, my 2020 MBP just arrived 2 days ago... And I updated from my 2013 MBP and was looking for another 7 year lifespan (2013 worked well for 7 years!). What do you think my lifespan of my 2020 MBP will be?

They just released a Mac Pro for dev use, I would expect it to be supported for at least 6-8 years, not to mention there are still Intel machines in the pipeline and they are predicting a 2 year transition. I wouldnt be surprised if we see Intel support through 2028 at least, maybe even into 2030 or longer
 
I'm actually a RISC fanboy so ARM doesn't scare me, but unless the whole rest of the industry ditches Intel, this is a dumb mistake and users will suffer for it.

The rest of the industry is already on ARM. There are an order of magnitude more devices with ARM architecture sold per year than with x86 architecture.
 
Thanks, I've been making the transition already for the last couple years. This is the final nail in the coffin of my hopes that Apple will ever make Macs again that I will care about. Mac OS has been the frog in the slowly boiling pot ever since the first iPhone came out, and it's clear Apple has every intention of forcing everyone into iOS and ditching Mac OS completely. Just look at Big Sur's new interface and the features they touted.

I'm actually a RISC fanboy so ARM doesn't scare me, but unless the whole rest of the industry ditches Intel, this is a dumb mistake and users will suffer for it.


Actually, I feel the same.Not a big of fan of this total iOS-fication. They might sucess preparing pro apps ready, but I wonder how with hardware? Existing PCie device and capture cards, graphic tablet, and previously cross compatible peripheral now would face unknown fate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
I watched it on my MBA. It was as smooth as Netflix. Maybe it was your connection?

no my connection was fine, AppleTV 4.

What I mean by jumpy or jarring is not the connection interfering .. just the rapid jump in transitions from scene to scene - Tim's transitions were sudden, like Frame to Frame. One moment he's on stage front and centre and next somewhere else. It's like talking about Apple silicon in one sentence, and in the same paragraph jumping about Wizard of Oz that's what I'm referring to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Jeebus. Every major thing people have demanded for years is in there. Default apps. Phone ringing doesnt take full screen. Widgets on home screen. New ways to organize home screen. Threaded messages.

You really thought they would add support for the insecure RCS message technology that even google admits is a failure?
Then release iMessage for Android. You're delusional if you think these new features are great when they completely fall flat unless everyone is on iPhone. Who is everyone that wanted this? Widgets? The crap that failed in Windows 8 and Android? I have spent time setting up a full screen photos for the people who call me. Will it be an option to keep fullscreen? No. Typical Apple. Tell me how to use my device and who to talk to (only other Apple users).
 
The rest of the industry is already on ARM. There are an order of magnitude more devices with ARM architecture sold per year than with x86 architecture.

Say that with my current gear which help me life. At this time it still cross compatible, but not sure compatibility guaranteed under ARM. Things like driver support is real pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Why would anyone buying a computer from the most valuable company in the world, and that has a history of supporting hardware longer than anyone else in the industry, be concerned about its long term functionality?
Maybe when it comes to smartphones, I don't think Catalina would work that well on 2006 Mac mini, while I can still run Windows 10 on said Mac mini.
 
Would have loved to see a cinebench score of that SoC. It would have given us an idea how powerful it is going to be compared to Ryzen & Intel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Not sure what "Osborne reasons" are, but I stand by what I said. If he didn't want to say, he could have just said nothing and not deceive people by clearly implying a longer period of time.



Oh my goodness. Just never mind....
“Osborning” means to inadvertently kill sales of your existing product by touting the next version coming in the future. Osborne went out of business before that new model could ever be released, since sales of the old version tanked.
 
Would have loved to see a cinebench score of that SoC. It would have given us an idea how powerful it is going to be compared to Ryzen & Intel.

They showed a graphic, that in itself should say enough.
I will try to find the part in the video, will post it shortly.
Screen Shot 2020-06-22 at 21.25.33.png
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.