To be fair this guy is a colossal winer who makes a living attacking apple now.
C'mon guys USE YOUR HEADS!
LOL!
I just entered camelcamelcamel Amazon price watches at $1999.99 for the base models in space gray and silver.
To be fair this guy is a colossal winer who makes a living attacking apple now.
C'mon guys USE YOUR HEADS!
Is your current model slowing down? It seems like you have good specs thereSo I need to upgrade my MBP....pretty much can't wait any longer. I use it almost only for music production using Logic Pro and LOTS of plug-ins, soft synths/samplers and audio tracks.
My current Late 2013 15" MBP (4 core i7 2.6Ghz with 16 Gig RAM and I TB SSD) is starting to bog down too much.
I'm trying to figure out if I "play it safe" with the new MBP 15" 2.2Ghz with 32 Gig RAM and 4TB SSD if I will notice a very sizable difference in performance, which would appear to my very basic Apple techy knowledge, to come from the 32 gig of RAM and the two extra cores.
Also, not sure if the extra GHz from the 2.6 6 cores version (....and a bit extra heat on the negative side...) would make that much difference or not for Music/Audio production use.
Thx for the help
Mike
Did you have any trouble with the keyboard? I am enjoying the 2015 keyboard. I tested the new keyboard in an apple store; although i don't like it that much, i can live with it. What I am worried about is the keyboard failure issue. After all, the only reason for me for preferring apple over other windows products is their quality control and macos. Don't want to spend over 2k if i cannot use the product for at least 5 years.
I am seriously considering dell xps 15, but it seems that they have lots of quality control issues with coil whine, screen ghosting, and some throttling as well. It seems like its difficult to get a good laptop without issues. I am doing further research on this. Lg gram does not have 32gigs model as far as I know. With my personal experience macbook pros runs without issues for a long time (lots of my colleagues use pre 2016 models without any issues; of course you can be unlucky and get a faulty model), which tempts me to buy a new macbook pro
The issue is the race to the bottom of costs! Apple wants to keep its profits high so they are cutting every corner they can. A lot of this has to do with the management team putting the shareholders interests in front of their customers! It gets back the analogy which comes first? the horse or the cart. Apple as of late seems to be putting the cart in front! If you build for your customers the dollars will come in on their own! Trying to pull the wool over their eyes won't fix things and in the long haul it will sour your relationship. If you want loyal customers you need to treat them with respect and honesty!
While I maybe railing on Apple here, Apple is not the only one thats doing this! The last few years there seems to be a push across all industries to cow-tow to the majority stock holders to create higher stock prices with high profit numbers. There is a limit here on how high you can go and not loose your customer base. While Apple has the cash to weather the storm it still not good for us who depend on their gear.
Does this sound familiar? The Wall Street Crash of 1929 was also riding high in a similar way just before - The signs of Greed!
Apple management needs to shake the fantasies out of their heads and right this ship of theirs. Get back to the basics! Give your customer base what it needs not the fantasies swirling in your heads. Pro's need ports not dongles! Pro's need performance not throttling! Pro's need serviceable systems not throw-a-ways! OR systems that cost 1/3 the cost in a single repair.
And lastly, the customer base does not want band-aid solutions and extended warranties based on the day of first shipment, but the date of when they purchased it! And, when you have a extended warranty issue email and/or text notification to the person and a means to update your notification DB (use a QR code within About This Mac as the means to connect and validate) so they know!
I ****ing hate it. This replaces a 2015 5k iMac so I mainly use my mechanical keyboard, but when I use just the keyboard... With that said the touchpad is best in class. TBH, I hate all laptop keyboards (with the exception of my Alienware), but this just sucks. I'd suggest buying a mechanical keyboard anyway for home use
You might be interested in checking out the article posted a few minutes ago. iFixit tested the 2018 keyboard by putting particulate into it.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/19/ifixit-2018-macbook-pro-keyboard-dust-exposure/
"You're cooling it wrong."
Is your current model slowing down? It seems like you have good specs there
Does this mean Apple outright lied about the function of the new keyboard design or does this just so happen to conincidentally work well for preventing particulates from entering in to the keyboard??You might be interested in checking out the article posted a few minutes ago. iFixit tested the 2018 keyboard by putting particulate into it.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/19/ifixit-2018-macbook-pro-keyboard-dust-exposure/
Does this mean Apple outright lied about the function of the new keyboard design or does this just so happen to conincidentally work well for preventing particulates from entering in to the keyboard??
Not good. But I’ll wait for the dust to settle before making any conclusions.At unveiling they told journalists that it wasn't meant to reduce that problem, only reduce noise. Unfortunately there is now apparently leaked internal documents saying otherwise. My guess would be they didn't want to publicly say they had improved it in that way for damage control/PR reasons, and also because of the lawsuits around it. That part is conjecture though.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/19/apple-confirms-2018-mbp-keyboard-prevents-debris/
Comparing the two? Are you for real?
Do you use Final cut pro on your iPhone a lot?iPads, iPhones, and MacBooks are all portable computers. Why wouldn't you compare them?
Do you use final cut on your iPhone a lot?
Ah indeed. I missed thatYou should probably read the entire conversation. Geromi912 is saying that it's not the software's job of manually throttling but if you read my first post, I mentioned Final Cut as a great example of handling video rendering.
Anyways, if you're talking about CPU utilization, 4k60 video recording utilizes the device's CPU just as much as FCPX would.
Geromi912 is saying that it's not the software's job of manually throttling but if you read my first post, I mentioned Final Cut as a great example of handling video rendering.
Exactly. This thing is thermally a **** up, you cant “software fix” this.It isn't the software's job. The fact that FCP might have slapped a bandaid on doesn't obviate Apple from their responsibility in this clusterf**k.
Thats a band aid. They need to firmware update it to run at lower voltage and clocks. But then they would be false advertising...I can see a silent firmware update coming that changes when the fans kick in at higher speeds in order to try keep the cpu cooler for longer.....
A tad of arrogance here... *you* for sure have thermal issuesExactly. This thing is thermally a **** up, you cant “software fix” this.
They need to recall them...
If they undervolted it or got a special underclocked i9 chip like the iMac Pro (where they use a different variant of xeon that produces 3,0ghz instead of 3,3ghz like off the shelf variant), the thing might have performed fine and people would still be happy. At least happier.
[doublepost=1532033604][/doublepost]
Thats a band aid. They need to firmware update it to run at lower voltage and clocks. But then they would be false advertising...
A tad of arrogance here... *you* for sure have thermal issues
Kidding a bit, but dude, you’re in no position to give them orders or make such assertions. Think about it 5sec. If people actually return those Macs, Apple will get it. You seem to be standing for *facts*, well ok, has the software update you already disregard been released and tested?
Physics. These chips are good but way too hot, you can run the fans faster or underclock it... but on a 5k machine this is an unacceptable oversight.
I’m in no position? Well i (and apprently plenty others) are in position of not ordering one, so thats the position im taking?
Well, then you probably know how heat works. They released this either insufficiently tested or undercooled, there’s really no other way around it, it doesnt achieve advertised speeds out of the box. Neither turbo nor baseYes, and rightfully so. Do not order it if you are not convinced, I support that. But do not judge an unreleased solution (if they even choose that path), especially if you are all about facts. (Btw I have a PhD in Physics)
Well, then you probably know how heat works. They released this either insufficiently tested or undercooled, there’s really no other way around it, it doesnt achieve advertised speeds out of the box. Neither turbo nor base
I still wish they used nerfed chips like imac pro 10-core does, would fit the chassis better.
Well, then you probably know how heat works. They released this either insufficiently tested or undercooled, there’s really no other way around it, it doesnt achieve advertised speeds out of the box. Neither turbo nor base
I still wish they used nerfed chips like imac pro 10-core does, would fit the chassis better.