Alright ignore precedent with resolution and displays.
Well, isn't that how precedents happen in the first place?
Ergonomics should determine size, not geek-lore.
Alright ignore precedent with resolution and displays.
Higher resolution content downscales onboard but you get full resolution over external output.One of the problems with a non-standard display resolution is that you either have to convert every video to the non-standard size or choose videos with higher resolutions to guarantee no loss of detail which wastes storage space. Given the nature of the HDMI output I suspect that is what Microsoft had in mind.
Yeah, this is the idea here. Not sure how efficient it is until we get an idea of the video chip inside (assuming its doing hardware scaling rather than CPU scaling).Higher resolution content downscales onboard but you get full resolution over external output.
True h.264 playback hardware is getting much more efficient. The iPod already plays back 640 x 480 media while the display is less.Yeah, this is the idea here. Not sure how efficient it is until we get an idea of the video chip inside (assuming its doing hardware scaling rather than CPU scaling).
Sure, it's possible that the Zune HD will have a dealbreaker issue or two that will be blatantly apparent once you get your hands on it. But my point was that this isn't your ordinary Microsoft product, and anyone who gives it the usual tar-and-feathers welcome ceremony and pre-emptively brushes it off as another epic fail isn't paying attention.You are right that it may not be second rate. But It's not obviously impressive either. We'll see when it comes out. It's like the Blackberry Storm... everybody thought it was going to be an amazing new smart phone, but when it came out, people hated it for the click screen.
We'll just have to wait and see.
One of the problems with a non-standard display resolution is that you either have to convert every video to the non-standard size or choose videos with higher resolutions to guarantee no loss of detail which wastes storage space. Given the nature of the HDMI output I suspect that is what Microsoft had in mind.
Sure, it's possible that the Zune HD will have a dealbreaker issue or two that will be blatantly apparent once you get your hands on it. But my point was that this isn't your ordinary Microsoft product, and anyone who gives it the usual tar-and-feathers welcome ceremony and pre-emptively brushes it off as another epic fail isn't paying attention.
The Microsoft we're used to will copy a product without adding anything new or unique, and they usually fail to copy what actually makes the original product attractive. And to top it off the design is usually underwhelming, if not plain ugly.
I don't see any of that here. It brings plenty of new features to the table (when was the last time Microsoft was actually ahead of the pack in any manner whatsoever? Did that ever happen before?), the form factor and design is good and it positions itself as a contrast to Apple's 'roundness' by going for angular shapes. The graphics are strikingly clear and simple with none of the usual Microsoft clutter and submenu hell, the transition animations are very tasteful... if the final product is anything like this, the sales potential is 20 times whatever it was for the original Zune. If they throw in a nice implementation of (MSN) Messenger Live, too, the kids will be all over this thing like mosquitos on nudists.
You are right that it may not be second rate. But It's not obviously impressive either. We'll see when it comes out. It's like the Blackberry Storm... everybody thought it was going to be an amazing new smart phone, but when it came out, people hated it for the click screen.
We'll just have to wait and see.
So, purple? Your sky is purple?
How in the world is windows better than OS X?
I'd say that nearly all current shows are 16:9, and have been for 4-5 years. The only shows I watch that are still stuck in 4:3 limbo are South Park and Family Guy. Everything else (Lost, Heroes, 30 Rock, The Office to name but a few) is 16:9.Anyone know how many tv shows are 16:9?
The Microsoft we're used to will copy a product without adding anything new or unique, and they usually fail to copy what actually makes the original product attractive. And to top it off the design is usually underwhelming, if not plain ugly.
Nope, this does...Things like that don't happen in XP, Vista, or Windows 7.
Things like that don't happen in XP, Vista, or Windows 7.
It brings plenty of new features to the table.
For the sake of argument, can we list them so we can see what's new?
Fm radio
Play hd video/pictures though a hdtv
Retro design
Rival GUI
Rival media cataloguing software
Plays flash web graphics
What else?
Things like that don't happen in XP, Vista, or Windows 7.
You have to admit though, OS X is 10 times more stable than windows.This line made me laugh.
I've had my Vista system lock up completely several times. No it doesn't force me to restart (merely because I'm patient) but I literally cannot do ANYTHING until things unbind.
The OS's of the world have flaws, thats ok and realistic, I just want to see that their creators are working on improving them. To me it looks like both MS and Apple are really working hard right now.
You have to admit though, OS X is 10 times more stable than windows.
I'd say that nearly all current shows are 16:9, and have been for 4-5 years.
That's another great thing about Macs, they don't slow down over time like windows machines do.From everything I've heard, but Ill make my call when I actually have leopard/SL (or have a mac for that matter).
I did use Tiger for a good 2 weeks on a G4 Powerbook (i may have the name wrong) that only had 512 mb of RAM last summer. It was a dream, a few beach balls here and there but nothing more than a 4 second wait, which I thought was AMAZING for such an old machine (I beleive that one was manufactured in 2004 if memory serves me right).
Ta, I feel I have learned something new.
Ta, spotted that as I pressed submit.![]()