Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Then return the damn phone (if you even bought one) and tell Apple
it sucks that way. If you didn’t buy one, what the hell are you complaining about, since this obviously doesn’t affect
you.
This is about good design and bad design. That's how this affects me. If you're going to put a notch into the display area, well you better make sure it actually works 100% of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovemykid3302012
FaceID is the worst for security. #1 Passcode #2 TouchID #3 FaceID which in my personal opinion is just a gimmick. Apple was pressured to put a new piece of tech in a phone and we got FaceID. TouchID under the screen would have been a lot more WOW / impressive to me at least. What's next VoiceID?

There's always the struggle of convenience vs security. Touch ID and Face ID are more convenient but less secure on their own while a strong password is more secure but less convenient. A better compromise is to combine both Touch ID with Face ID as a multi-factor authentication (MFA) since you already have to look and touch the phone with Face ID. Only roadblock is the slightly higher cost to Apple and their profit margin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CD3660 and acctman
Nevertheless, the video is further evidence that Face ID isn't 100 percent foolproof given just the right circumstances. If you are concerned about this, Apple merely recommends using only a passcode to authenticate.
Or TouchID. Wait for this stuff to be stable. TouchID was also crappy at first.
 
Regardless if true or not, in practical real world usuage, Face ID is not more secure than Touch ID. Facts.
Hmmm thats not what was said at the Apple Event. Wasnt it like a million to one? These people should be buying lotto tickets. Anyway.....they are unlocking it wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miniyou64
I read the article before posting, and still question what they are saying as being accurate. Why create a brand new youtube account just for this, and not include the follow-up training and tests in this, or a separate video since they already bothered to create this channel in the first place.

I suspect (like you do), if genuine, the device had little time to learn.



Read above.
Shouldn't it work first time though? Isn't this a fundamental flaw in the technology that it needs to learn over time?
I want my device secure the minute I've completed setting it up. Not one week or a month later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovemykid3302012
According to the article in Wired, when the mother rescanned her face in better lighting, her son was not able to unlock the phone. Anyway, this is first gen tech. Imagine the 2nd or 3rd gen of FaceID!
Apple abandoned TouchID at 2nd Generation. Likewise, Face ID could also be abandoned in favor of some prickly device which tests your blood for specific DNA and then unlocks your iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
but you would actually have to know the password. If you can pick up your parents iphone and unlock it without any security code needed that is a problem.

In my day the slap around the head code would have deployed so quick I'd have thought I was time travelling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattopotamus
Soooo basically FaceID is an utterly pointless security measure and Apple suggest you go back 5 years and use a ‘passcode’.

Yeah that’s value for money, a grand for ditching something that works for something that doesn’t...
 
What happens if you try to enrolls two different faces in scan one and two during setup?

That would still be a failure of the security system. Imagine a password system that asks for a password input twice for setup confirmation and accepting a different password on the second try then using a hybrid of the two passwords. If Fake ID allows setting up with two different faces then it's still a fail.
 
Jealous much? LOL

Seriously, though if you think you can do better than show us otherwise what do you want? A ticker tape parade ? The red carpet ?

why would I pay $1k+ for an iPhone? Regardless of whatever apple is selling, it's all late to the game features. Wireless charging at 5w, when you get 15W with fast charging (Samsung). Of course I can do better and have been. When you parade around with a top model toy that's $1249+ you best make sure your highly touted security feature works flawlessly. Otherwise what is the incentive for owning an iPhone X? It's definitely not the notch, not the lack of headphone jack, lack of wireless fast charging (even fast charging out of the box), lack of NFC read/write, lack of Samsung pay (MST), the list goes on. Worse feature missing is the ability to pause video recording. No thank you!

But you already know that!
 
Do we know how the phone was trained, and how much time it was used before it given to her son? If the password was ever entered just before the device saw his face for the first time?

Like the mask, it lacks full context.
I think they did provide some context though..... From the article it happened right after they were done setting up the new phone
We are seeing a flood of videos on YouTube from iPhone users who have gotten their hands on the new iPhone X and are trying to trick the Face ID. When my wife and I received our iPhone X, we had no such intention. However, things changed right after we were done setting up our new iPhones on November 3rd. We were sitting down in our bedroom and were just done setting up the Face IDs, our 10-year-old son walked in anxious to get his hands on the new iPhone X. Right away my wife declared that he was not going to access her phone. Acting exactly as a kid would do when asked to not do something, he picked up her phone and with just a glance got right in.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.