After more agonizing over my Heisman Trophy choice than at any time in 24 years, theres no doubt that Cam Newton deserves the award based solely on his on-field performance.
The dual-threat Auburn quarterback, a super-sized Tim Tebow, blows the field away. His 2010 numbers are as powerful and impressive as any in recent memory.
But since the Heisman Trust ask its voters to recognize the outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity, Im duty-bound to honor that newly instituted integrity clause.
Im sorry, Auburn fans, but after the NCAA confirmed from its investigation this week that Newtons father, Cecil, solicited his son in a pay-for-play scheme to attend Mississippi State, thats a game-changer for this voter. I cannot, in good conscience, put Newton on my ballot, though he may still win the Heisman in a runaway.
It doesnt matter if the other 924 voters agree, or if I must go on that limb alone, its impossible for me to ignore that Cam however impressive hes been in leading Auburn to a perfect season had a father engage in a despicable auction for his services.
Please, spare me the self-righteous indignation. The integrity clause is purely subjective, to be interpreted as each voter deems fit. Others may be fine with voting for Newton because the NCAA says it couldnt find evidence that Cam knew of his fathers scam, and that is their call. My colleagues are entitled to that view without me ridiculing them for it.
Before the NCAA reinstated Newton, I was willing to not let what happened two years ago at Florida the purchase of a stolen computer or multiple cheating allegations that Cam never denied eliminate him from consideration. A lot of growing up takes place between the ages of 19-21.
Until more evidence from the investigation surfaced, I didnt want to penalize Newton for actions that took place two schools ago.
Though the NCAA hasnt found him in violation of its rules yet, the Southeastern Conference, whose leader is obsessed about erasing its cheating reputation, publicly said Cecils actions were unacceptable. Well, duh!
SEC commissioner Mike Slive says the NCAA made the right decision. Yeah, pretty convenient for his league to not lose its best player while pursuing another national title. Not to mention that NCAA investigations which typically take years to complete suddenly made a quick, favorable ruling for Newton.
It seems every time a layer is peeled away from CamGate, the odor becomes more intense.
Given what is now known beyond dispute, its impossible for me not to penalize Cam for his fathers sins. Is it not that way in real life? If a father breaks the law and goes to jail, do not his children suffer in lost income and lost quality time?
Think about Southern Cals football team. The Trojans are now suffering with NCAA probation for violations committed five years ago by Reggie Bush, who gave back his Heisman to avoid the embarrassment of having it stripped away.
Its been documented that Cam Newton wanted to go play for Dan Mullen at Mississippi State before his father steered him toward Auburn. Does the NCAA really think were so naïve that Cam didnt have suspicions about why Dad wanted to go against his wishes?
You might argue thats taking an unfair leap in a conspiracy theory, but for me, it passes the beyond-reasonable-doubt test. Cam had to know, or at least suspect, Dad was dirty.
So for that reason, my Heisman ballot, in order, will be: Oklahoma State receiver Justin Blackmon, Boise State quarterback Kellen Moore and Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck. I know Blackmon is not high on everybodys Heisman Watch list, but the nations top wideout excelled against better competition than Moore or Luck.
Therell be no regret on my part if Newton wins the Heisman and gets to keep it.
Hey, Im just trying to follow the Heisman rule about integrity. The person who should be sorry is Cecil Newton.
Hes the one who put his son in a bad spot.