Since this is the radical new OLED iPad, it could have a similar design to the iPhone X.
Except the increased bezel and body size should mean no notch.
and maybe they will keep the TouchID
Since this is the radical new OLED iPad, it could have a similar design to the iPhone X.
Except the increased bezel and body size should mean no notch.
I like that line-up, though that would beg the question, what would happen to the pricing? Where does the now $699 iPhone go to from here?
Front facing 3D camera makes little sense outside of facial recognition. A rear mounted 3D camera where you can scan objects while seeing on the display what you are scanning would be much better. Maybe Apple has something outside of animoji poo in mind for the front FaceID camera, but it would appear a much more utilitarian argument could be made for having it on the back.
There is too much news from Ming-Chi Kuo extolling the virtues of the Face ID camera. It almost looks like he is trying to justify Apple's decision to drop TouchID.
The iPad will simply remain on the table.How exactly would holding a giant iPad to your face be magically better? Seriously, Please tell us.
Can't wait, will be a nice upgrade. Hoping for something just like this.
![]()
I’m torn on the idea.
It would be a good combination with the Apple Pencil to open Notes without having to TouchID first.
But I have reservations...
First, the notch and the terrible interface around it would be horrific on a device you commonly use in vertical mode with keyboards. Hopefully, the terrible feedback post launch will make Apple re-think this design decision. Just keep the notch for the login screen. It’ll be iconic, and that’s enough without messing with interface.
Second, I’m not convinced face ID is good for things like 1password. Could be too each for someone to open without your knowledge and conciencously pressing.
[doublepost=1507571945][/doublepost]
Nice work.
I really hope they don’t keep the notch for the iPad. It’s bad enough on the upcoming iphone X
A11X?FaceID + 3D Touch + OLED + A12X = iPad home run. The iPad line has a very bright, long future
Maybe the large screen real estate “wasted” but idk bc i dont use an ipad pro for my work.This makes zero sense. Why exactly is using Touch ID such a "burden" for you? How exactly would holding a giant iPad to your face be magically better? Seriously, Please tell us.
True.. they shouldn't release 9 or 11...
i really hope if they put faceID in ipad, at least be close to this concept. Or at least same bezels side bezels from 10.5" top and bottomCan't wait, will be a nice upgrade. Hoping for something just like this.
![]()
Now the obvious question is when it will come to the macs instead of just the iDevices.
In general, this is an easy prediction for Kuo to make. It will come true.....eventually. If iPhone X is the future, then Touch ID is definitely an endangered species and will be removed from the iPad at some point. But let's step back for a second and think about this:
1) Most analysts agree at this point that due to Face ID sensor availability.....or lack thereof.....iPhone X orders aren't going to catch up until sometime in the first half of next year. I doubt that Apple is going to launch Face ID on any iPad models during that time, as they will need all the sensor production they can get for iPhone X. I don't think the tech in iPhone X is anywhere near ready for true mass production yet.
2) iPad Pro was just updated in June of 2017, and it seems like they've moved to an "every year and a half or so" update schedule for iPads. So I'm taking any predictions saying anything about new iPads before fall/holiday 2018 with a huge grain of salt.
3) iPhone first came out in 2007. 2017 is when iPhone X launched. The "standard" sized 9.7" iPad came out in 2010, with one year in there where they released two models. Kind of makes the case for a true iPad X to come out in 2019 or even 2020 when they can really get the production lines rolling on these insanely sophisticated camera arrays. Not that Apple cares about sticking to strict timelines or naming conventions--after all, they are skipping iPhone 9 completely as far as we're all aware.
I don't know, just spitballing here, but June 2018 doesn't seem likely to me. Make no mistake though--Face ID is going to come to all iOS devices (and probably Macs too) eventually. Touch ID's days are numbered.
How are those special individuals who put bandaids or sticky notes to cover their FaceTime/iSight camera on their MacBooks going to react to this??
All of what you just said could prove to be right. Weirder things have happened.As someone else already noted, the number of iPad Pros produced is far lower than the number of iPhones, so production constraints may not be a major issue. Further, producers will be about 9 months into the ramp-up/learning curve on this hardware by the time they'd have to deliver the parts for a mid-2018 iPad. The worst kinks had better be ironed out by then.
Production of the late 2018 iPhones is just 3 months further down the line from introduction of a hypothetical mid 2018 iPad. Will iPhone 8s (or 9, or whatever it turns out to be) still have Touch ID? If Face ID turns out to be a killer feature, will Apple withhold it from the "normally-priced" product line for two years? If, as Kuo has also recently stated, Apple has an over-two-year head start over the rest of the industry, would they throw that advantage away? Seems unlikely. So, again, supply chain will likely already be well into the ramp-up for that demand.
Perhaps iPad is on an 18-month refresh cycle, but if there seems a compelling reason to move that up, it's not etched in stone, either.
[doublepost=1507573814][/doublepost]
They'll get larger bandaids or sticky notes. ;-)
Reminds me of all the posts around the beginning of the year about what a beast the iPhone X will be; ultimately turned to disappointment for many. Save yourself the heartache and stop fantasising about a perfect iPad.FaceID + 3D Touch + OLED + A12X = iPad home run. The iPad line has a very bright, long future
Well given due to the positioning of each model, the ideal pricing that would make sense is:I like that line-up, though that would beg the question, what would happen to the pricing? Where does the now $699 iPhone go to from here?
Let's see how well it works with the iPhone before everyone start praying for it to be in other devices. If they want to have it on the iPad in addition to touch ID that's fine. But I don't want to replace it with unproven tech.
They could have been doing that for years. The prospect of selling less devices to a family is what’s holding them back. To be more precise: Greed is what’s holding them back.I predict FaceID on the iPad will come with multi user support. You pick up the family iPad sitting on the living room table, and it unlocks already set to your home screen.
To me that’s about as seamless an experience you can have for a shared device.
Can't wait, will be a nice upgrade. Hoping for something just like this.
![]()
I predict FaceID on the iPad will come with multi user support. You pick up the family iPad sitting on the living room table, and it unlocks already set to your home screen.
To me that’s about as seamless an experience you can have for a shared device.
The way I see it is that the 10.5" would see a screen increase, changing aspect ratio at the same time. It doesn't make sense for the 12.9" to increase in size but if it did happen they could do it and still reduce the overall size by making the bezels smaller.We really don't know what size it will be. Reducing the bezels allows for a larger screen in a more compact body (iPhone X). Apple could work to put a 10.5 in the body of a 9.7, increase the resolution, and drop the 12.9? I am not sure, but yes I agree it will be difficult to produce either way.
I don’t think that’ll be wise. There seems to be getting even more screen size fragmentation under iOS. It used to be a selling point for developers. Is it easier today to get around all those screen sizes?I wonder if the iPad Pro 10.5" screen size would be bumped up as a result of removing the home button. Maybe they could go with ~10.9" without increasing the overall frame?