Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think that these guys made a mistake when desiging their case. I DO believe that Apple gave case manufacturers design hints in the form of the first attached image that made the rounds on the internets a few weeks back. But if you look at the first box (upper left, showing the new slope of the back) you'll notice that the two phones have the exact same thickness in their sillouette. I think that is very unlikely to happen, and I also doubt that the phone will get any thicker. Someone posted the second image in another thread, and if you line it up with the outline of the first image you will see it is almost a perfect fit (slightly too thin, but very close). I think this is much more likely to be what we get! What do you think? :apple:

Yea definately, that is what looks like the design route Apple would go down with the next iPhone.

A few people have mentioned the new iPod Nano happenings when it got slated when the actual design was released. Names like iPod fatty, iPod Bilbo, iPod Chubby etc etc. Yes it was a move away from the original shape, but it was still razor thin.

From the fact that the new nano was still super thin, I would guess that new iPhone is definitely not going to be thicker. Changing the shape is a totally different thing to changing the thickness.
 
Vaja Cases

Great. Hoping my Vaja Ivolution generation one case has a chance to work! One can at least hope!
 
Apple Legal would have trounced on this by now, even if it were slightly close to resembling the real deal....
No actually.

Apple has (many times) let loose some maquettes of products they are about to release for the express purpose of accessory manufacturers needing to know about the dimensions of the new product.

This is exactly what was rumored to have happened this time, and the leaks of the 3G iphone pictures appeared to be exactly that, pictures of a maquette of the new iPhone back design. Now we have an accessory maker releasing mock-ups of a new case based on the (purported) new back design.

None of this is very unusual, unexpected, illegal or (necessarily) unbelievable on the face of it.

There is no proof whatsoever that this is in fact how the new 3G iPhone will look, but to make out like it's some kind of "obvious fake" (like many on this thread have), or to imply that this is unusual behavior that Apple legal is going to "swoop down on" is just wrong.

If the previous rumors of a new case design are correct, it seems to me that there is nothing that this company is doing that is illegal or inappropriate in any way. Better yet, we have a "meshing" of sorts of multiple rumors that all point to the same thing. Seems to me this is even more proof of curved, ceramic backed, black and/or white iPhones. Other than a few obvious red-herrings, all rumors have pointed to this same device lately.

The worst thing this company is doing is making really, really ugly, tasteless and stupid iPhone cases. Sadly, this is not against the law either. :rolleyes:

.
 
Its just like when car companies send their new sport cars out on the test track covered in lumpy sweaters.

ill reserve judgement about the supposed extra few mm until i see it naked.
 
iTurtle on its back??

Let me add my "here here"s to those who think there's no way this can be the shape of the new iPhone.

A curved back?? No. As others have pointed out, it would not lie flat on a surface. Promotional photos of iPhone 1 (including as recently as the SDK roadmap promos) show the iPhone lying flat, so that is obviously a "position under consideration" by the designers. Furthermore, when this hypothetical rounded-back iPhone vibrated, it would rock around all over the place like a turtle struggling on its back!! (Wait, maybe that could be a kinda cool effect... nah.)

I'm a bit confused by those who think a curved back would greatly enhance the ergonomics. Adding material to the back of the device simply to maintain contact with the fingers as they curl around the back? Is this really necessary for comfort? And even if it is desirable, this rumored image isn't even curved enough to make much difference in ergonomic experience: there would still be a gap between phone and fingers. (I mean, we're not talking Mighty Mouse amount of ergonomic curve here!)

And thicker?? In what version of reality (distortion field) would Steve Jobs ever allow a product line which aspires to thinness to instead get bigger and thicker?? If so, that would mean he would actually be willing to compromise and give in to 3G/technical spec demands? When has that ever happened in the history of Jobs/Apple? Never.

Apple's waited this long to do 3G... they're not going to unveil it with a bloated, back-pedaling product.
 
Of course it'll blend! Those blenders blend anything... even other blenders!!

The real question is this...........

Will they find Earth? What will happen when they get there?? Can Grace Park be any hotter? Why must there be an extra week's wait until the next episode?? Does it have anything to do with the iPhone??

Oh, I mean... will it be black or chrome backed... yes, that'll do....

But back to the real question! :D
 
this is fake

nothing apple legal yet...

thus fake

One or two have pointed out that its not unusual for Apple to release the dimensions to the manufacturers. Fair comment.

What you say about no Apple legal rings true though. As soon as the new iPod Nano was leaked they were all over it in a flash.

Aside: I really have a problem with using Bold Underline at the moment. Im sorry... :( Must be stressed....
 
Although I doubt that Apple would give details of the 3G iPhone to a random company.

It has been shown time and time again that this type of accessory maker gets *NO* advance knowledge. This is completely bogus. It's this accessory maker trying to drum up some extra business, just as some case manufacturer did before the MacBook Air's launch by saying that they had a case for the MacBook Air before it was officially announced. It's not that they had inside information, it's that they are capitalizing on rumors.

Undoubtedly, when the real 3G iPhone is announced, they will go and actually do the real design work on the case, based on the real 3G iPhone, not the rumors.
 
eh...

Complete with a rotary dial, right? ;)

What's an iPhone? And why would a phone want to experience 3 times the force of gravity??? Is it for when you throw it at those ASBO knife throwing female alcoholics you keep reading about in the Daily Mail?

"Margaret!, Margaret, have you heard anything on the wireless about a phone with eyes???"

Mine's the one with the "enough already of the iPhone jibba jabba" stuff...

;)
 
Does anyone remember the company that put out the skin for the "chubby" ipod a few days before it was released last year? Is that company still in business? If not, then I'd suspect that the apple legal department came down on them hard for releasing the specs before them. If they are still in business, then I'd assume that apple won't worry about this skin for the iphone coming out early.

edit: sorry, this was posted earlier, I just missed it. Thanks, Arn!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtrctyjoe View Post
How long after the nano case leak did Apple go public with the current nano?
https://www.macrumors.com/2007/09/01/...new-ipod-nano/

Looks like they were "leaked" Sept 1st, and the announcement was Sept 5th.

arn
 
this is fake

nothing apple legal yet...

thus fake

While you bring up a good point, that would probably hold true if an entity revealed trade secret information regarding an upcoming Apple product, I think even Apple legal would have a tough time with this one.

This website is not implying or claiming to purport the new iPhone in itself. They are advertising one of their own upcoming products ( a case ) and using a stock image phone photo to show what an iPhone would look like in the case.


edit: I do not know the conditions Apple set for manufactures that were allowed to get a heads up on specs for creating cases etc So I don't know what this company is legally bound to in this regard however we can still see why this might not be a clear cut "take down those images or suffer legal consequence" judgement might be applicable here.
 
Well, if that winds up being the design for the G2 iPhone, then I'm really glad that I have my little, flat-backed, tall-looking-with-the-screen-flush-with-the-sides, non-bacon-and-cheeseburger-addicted G1 iPhone ;)
 
All this is, is a teeny tiny company's way of getting people to their site for a look-see. Do you know how easy it is for them to create a mold and a single CASE for this "3G" phone they supposedly know all about? Super EASY.

They get their name splashed around while people goo-goo gaa-gaa about the pending release of the new phone.

That's it.
 
If this is true, then this phone will be a pig if you actually want a case added to it. Thats the bummer about adding a case to the (thinner) current model.

Kind of "PALMish".


Besides, why would apple care about outside case manufacturers? I would think they would jump all over being the first to get those sales by making/being the first to manufacture their own.
 
They are in the google ad's now:

Picture 1.png

Doubt it means anything though.
 
I think that these guys made a mistake when desiging their case. I DO believe that Apple gave case manufacturers design hints in the form of the first attached image that made the rounds on the internets a few weeks back. But if you look at the first box (upper left, showing the new slope of the back) you'll notice that the two phones have the exact same thickness in their sillouette. I think that is very unlikely to happen, and I also doubt that the phone will get any thicker. Someone posted the second image in another thread, and if you line it up with the outline of the first image you will see it is almost a perfect fit (slightly too thin, but very close). I think this is much more likely to be what we get! What do you think? :apple:

just hope it s like the one on the right....just love it
 
It has been shown time and time again that this type of accessory maker gets *NO* advance knowledge. This is completely bogus.

You are wrong on this. If anything accessory manufacturers are the ones who get advance notice. Apple wants you to be able to walk into a store on day #1 and buy a 3G iPhone and a 3G iPhone case. Now, that doesn't prove it's true... but it brings it into the realm of possibility.

Cases for the (then unreleased) iPod Nano were also leaked ahead of time:
https://www.macrumors.com/2007/09/01/cases-for-new-ipod-nano/

arn
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.