[A] The Agency GAME OVER -- AGENTS WIN

[Koodauw]

Makes sense to me and makes it more likely we have an all agent team (or one that is all going to vote Success). I'd like to know your reason for suggesting it though.

You just seem like less an infi, and im still trying to figure out game play.

 

[Queen of Spades]

i am fine with fenris on the team, but then maybe it should be QoS to make space, since one out of fenris/qos/mscriv is an Infi

At some point we have to try to move a mission forward...with that said, please don't swap me out.

 

[Don't panic]

At some point we have to try to move a mission forward...with that said, please don't swap me out.

i agre that this mission should be built with the idea of going forward, unless the new plots uncover an Infi

 

[Koodauw]

Some one post some hot lady pics and get @Moyank24 in here stat!

 

[Queen of Spades]

Some one post some hot lady pics and get @Moyank24 in here stat!

@Moyank24 paging Agent...what's your Agent name again?

 

[Moyank24]

@Moyank24 paging Agent...what's your Agent name again?

You rang?

It's Awesome. Agent Awesome.

I posted the list that DP suggested, so let's yay/nay this b****.

DP
Twietee
QOS
Koodauw
Astroboy

 

[ravenvii]

The spy sees the vote in the last completed vote, not partial/scuttled votes which are null and void.

 

[Don't panic]

YAY

 

[Queen of Spades]

Yay

 

[twietee]

YAY

 

[Don't panic]

what happened to @TechGod ?

 

[twietee]

that said: am i paranoid re fenris? lol. don't take it the wrong way, buddy! all meant in the name of the cause! 😀

 

[Koodauw]

YAY

 

[Astroboy907]

Yay as well

 

[Don't panic]

here is a question for everyone: do we think there was an INFI in mission 1 who hid and voted 'success' (in addition to the one who voted to fail)?

 

[WoodNUFC]

Nay

I'm not on that list and I am an agent. Therefore, if Moyank is an agent, there must be an infiltrator or two amongst that mission group.

 

[ravenvii]

The yays have it. The plots:

Strong Leader (sorry)
Investigate
Expose

 

[Don't panic]

darn, the strong leader was the least desirable one

i think give the investigate/strong leader to me and twietee and the expose to qos/astroboy to use on astroboy/qos

thoughts?

 

[FenrisMoonlight]

heavily disagree on your (recent) take on no conf, fenris. traitors fear plots the most by far i'd say. pretty strange reasoning (again) to be that afraid of an inf to not use the plot as we did but at the very same time suggest we should just go along with an educatrd guess (at most) of mo/dp. also knowing under surveillance would lose it's power if that'd fail.

not comfortable with fenris on the team. any stromg reasoning there koodauw?

off for sports now though.

Twietee if you weren't already confirmed to be a agent I'd be thinking you were an infiltrator right now. Do you really think it doesn't make sense to keep a no confidence to be able to abort a mission if its proved there is a infiltrator on the team after the mission team has been approved. Considering the plot cards yet to be used its a likely occurrence that we would be able to confirm the identity of 1 or more people after the plots are distributed.

 

[Don't panic]

well, we should be able to validate/expose this team before voting,
hopefully i don't have to use the NC plotcard

how do you think the plots should be used this time around?

meanwhile, an update of the votes:

 

[FenrisMoonlight]

Wow those votes came fast - and all yay's by people on the team @Don't panic @twietee As agents, I really think you should have held back your yay votes so we could see how other people voted first. As it is we can't really read much into the voting.

Votes
yay: 5 Don't panic, Queen of Spades, twietee, Koodauw, Astroboy907
nay: 1 WoodNUFC

Yet to vote: TechGod, FenrisMoonlight, mscriv

Voting Log
Post 558 Don't panic voted for yay
Post 559 Queen of Spades voted for yay
Post 560 twietee voted for yay
Post 563 Koodauw voted for yay
Post 564 Astroboy907 voted for yay
Post 566 WoodNUFC voted for nay

 

[Queen of Spades]

Expose and Investigate are good ones, though. Maybe use Expose on me and I can investigate...who? Astroboy or Koodauw?

 

[Don't panic]

Wow those votes came fast - and all yay's by people on the team @Don't panic @twietee As agents, I really think you should have held back your yay votes so we could see how other people voted first. As it is we can't really read much into the voting.

Votes
yay: 5 Don't panic, Queen of Spades, twietee, Koodauw, Astroboy907
nay: 1 WoodNUFC

Yet to vote: TechGod, FenrisMoonlight, mscriv

Voting Log
Post 558 Don't panic voted for yay
Post 559 Queen of Spades voted for yay
Post 560 twietee voted for yay
Post 563 Koodauw voted for yay
Post 564 Astroboy907 voted for yay
Post 566 WoodNUFC voted for nay

yes, you are right I should have waited

 

[mscriv]

Wow, stuff is moving really fast during the workday. Sorry, I can't keep up as much as I'd like.

here is a question for everyone: do we think there was an INFI in mission 1 who hid and voted 'success' (in addition to the one who voted to fail)?

My thought the entire game have been that this premise is false. I think if there were two infiltrators on the first mission we would have seen two votes to fail the mission.

 

[FenrisMoonlight]

darn, the strong leader was the least desirable one

i think give the investigate/strong leader to me and twietee and the expose to qos/astroboy to use on astroboy/qos

thoughts?

I'd probably go strong leader to DP and investigate to Twietee (following the chain of proof) rather than branching in the middle with DP proving another person to be an agent.

Expose - ideally would go to an agent - but since that's not possible I'd say QoS as the most trustworthy of QoS and Astroboy at this point. Giving it to an infiltrator they could waste it on someone already cleared but that would expose them as a infiltrator so it would still help us.