You just seem like less an infi, and im still trying to figure out game play.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[A] The Agency GAME OVER -- AGENTS WIN
- Thread starter ravenvii
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You just seem like less an infi, and im still trying to figure out game play.
At some point we have to try to move a mission forward...with that said, please don't swap me out.
i agre that this mission should be built with the idea of going forward, unless the new plots uncover an Infi
You rang?
It's Awesome. Agent Awesome.
I posted the list that DP suggested, so let's yay/nay this b****.
DP
Twietee
QOS
Koodauw
Astroboy
The spy sees the vote in the last completed vote, not partial/scuttled votes which are null and void.
here is a question for everyone: do we think there was an INFI in mission 1 who hid and voted 'success' (in addition to the one who voted to fail)?
darn, the strong leader was the least desirable one
i think give the investigate/strong leader to me and twietee and the expose to qos/astroboy to use on astroboy/qos
thoughts?
i think give the investigate/strong leader to me and twietee and the expose to qos/astroboy to use on astroboy/qos
thoughts?
Twietee if you weren't already confirmed to be a agent I'd be thinking you were an infiltrator right now. Do you really think it doesn't make sense to keep a no confidence to be able to abort a mission if its proved there is a infiltrator on the team after the mission team has been approved. Considering the plot cards yet to be used its a likely occurrence that we would be able to confirm the identity of 1 or more people after the plots are distributed.
well, we should be able to validate/expose this team before voting,
hopefully i don't have to use the NC plotcard
how do you think the plots should be used this time around?
meanwhile, an update of the votes:
hopefully i don't have to use the NC plotcard
how do you think the plots should be used this time around?
meanwhile, an update of the votes:
Wow those votes came fast - and all yay's by people on the team @Don't panic @twietee As agents, I really think you should have held back your yay votes so we could see how other people voted first. As it is we can't really read much into the voting.
Votes
yay: 5 Don't panic, Queen of Spades, twietee, Koodauw, Astroboy907
nay: 1 WoodNUFC
Yet to vote: TechGod, FenrisMoonlight, mscriv
Voting Log
Post 558 Don't panic voted for yay
Post 559 Queen of Spades voted for yay
Post 560 twietee voted for yay
Post 563 Koodauw voted for yay
Post 564 Astroboy907 voted for yay
Post 566 WoodNUFC voted for nay
Votes
yay: 5 Don't panic, Queen of Spades, twietee, Koodauw, Astroboy907
nay: 1 WoodNUFC
Yet to vote: TechGod, FenrisMoonlight, mscriv
Voting Log
Post 558 Don't panic voted for yay
Post 559 Queen of Spades voted for yay
Post 560 twietee voted for yay
Post 563 Koodauw voted for yay
Post 564 Astroboy907 voted for yay
Post 566 WoodNUFC voted for nay
Expose and Investigate are good ones, though. Maybe use Expose on me and I can investigate...who? Astroboy or Koodauw?
Wow, stuff is moving really fast during the workday. Sorry, I can't keep up as much as I'd like.
My thought the entire game have been that this premise is false. I think if there were two infiltrators on the first mission we would have seen two votes to fail the mission.
My thought the entire game have been that this premise is false. I think if there were two infiltrators on the first mission we would have seen two votes to fail the mission.
I'd probably go strong leader to DP and investigate to Twietee (following the chain of proof) rather than branching in the middle with DP proving another person to be an agent.
Expose - ideally would go to an agent - but since that's not possible I'd say QoS as the most trustworthy of QoS and Astroboy at this point. Giving it to an infiltrator they could waste it on someone already cleared but that would expose them as a infiltrator so it would still help us.