This will be a big deal to me when Adobe announces that I can pay for a license upfront instead of having to lease the software and get stuck with a subscription.
For all those who defend Adobe Cash Cow, your math is completely wrong. Those of us who were used to buying a license weren't upgrading every cycle, hence not costing us around $199 every other year. Many of us upgraded every 2-3 cycles or longer, which can be translated to 4-7 years. In fact, I know professionals who still use older versions of Photoshop, from version 7 to CS4.
I started with Adobe CS[1]. I actually bought a full version of CS[1] shortly after CS2 was announced in 2005 and Adobe upgraded me for free. I didn't upgrade until CS6 was announced in 2012 which I ended up buying CS5 shortly after the announcement and Adobe upgraded me to CS6 for free. It's now 2015 and in 10 years, I've spent a total of around $550 or $55 per year or $4.58 per month. That's far less expensive than anything Adobe has to offer with Cash Cow.
Anyone who thinks an $8-10 monthly subscription for the Photoshop bundle, for example, is a great deal, is only fooling themselves.
I'm personally sticking with CS6 for as long as I can and when it's time to move on, I'll be looking for an alternative for it unless Adobe can offer a much more compelling product with a much more competitive price. Don't get me wrong, I understand that Adobe needed to do what they felt was in the best interest to make money but their short-sightedness have cost them many long-term customers.
Lastly, I have tried CC and have a subscription that was given to me by the school I am currently attending. I downloaded only what I needed for my classes but stayed with CS6 for Photoshop. I really wasn't impressed by anything currently offered. Either way, now that I don't need those apps, there is no reason for me to keep CC despite it being available to me.
I find it sad that anyone who needs one of Adobe's creative apps now will get suckered into a subscription model.
For all those who defend Adobe Cash Cow, your math is completely wrong. Those of us who were used to buying a license weren't upgrading every cycle, hence not costing us around $199 every other year. Many of us upgraded every 2-3 cycles or longer, which can be translated to 4-7 years. In fact, I know professionals who still use older versions of Photoshop, from version 7 to CS4.
I started with Adobe CS[1]. I actually bought a full version of CS[1] shortly after CS2 was announced in 2005 and Adobe upgraded me for free. I didn't upgrade until CS6 was announced in 2012 which I ended up buying CS5 shortly after the announcement and Adobe upgraded me to CS6 for free. It's now 2015 and in 10 years, I've spent a total of around $550 or $55 per year or $4.58 per month. That's far less expensive than anything Adobe has to offer with Cash Cow.
Anyone who thinks an $8-10 monthly subscription for the Photoshop bundle, for example, is a great deal, is only fooling themselves.
I'm personally sticking with CS6 for as long as I can and when it's time to move on, I'll be looking for an alternative for it unless Adobe can offer a much more compelling product with a much more competitive price. Don't get me wrong, I understand that Adobe needed to do what they felt was in the best interest to make money but their short-sightedness have cost them many long-term customers.
Lastly, I have tried CC and have a subscription that was given to me by the school I am currently attending. I downloaded only what I needed for my classes but stayed with CS6 for Photoshop. I really wasn't impressed by anything currently offered. Either way, now that I don't need those apps, there is no reason for me to keep CC despite it being available to me.
I find it sad that anyone who needs one of Adobe's creative apps now will get suckered into a subscription model.
Last edited: