Neither apple will do it right and you will see, i assure you!Not done right, I assure you.
Neither apple will do it right and you will see, i assure you!Not done right, I assure you.
Calm down.
It's not a gimmick. I have it on my S7edge and i use it all the time when i'm at the office. Instead of putting the phone down on the table, i put in on the dock and i have a charged battery all day.
I guess amoled screens are unimaginative gimmicks, too.![]()
Semantics - its more or less has to be a surface touching something else - its basically not advantage to plugging a cable in, hence pointless.
What you want is to walk into a room and have the device charge up in your pocket - THAT is useful wireless charging and thats why they're working on.
I'm not. I can't imagine Apple coming up with any new technology to get me to spring $100's of dollars for, and the interruption of wiping, selling old, and restoring to new. Hassle. $100's of dollars and hassle... for what?Where does that leave us for the iPhone 7? i find it difficult to believe that Apple wont do anything for this years iPhone, there are people who like myself will be upgrading from the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus.
Touch ID is the least of their concerns. Have you ever used a device (with regularity) that has a software home button? Its a disaster.By the way, although I don't think it would be a smart move, removing the home button is more than plausible. They have patented fingerprint sensors under the touchscreen, so I think there's a chance.
Phenomenal hardware and software at the moment from android
Tired of repeating this, but google WiTricity. I'm not linking it again. THAT is true wireless charging, not the physical contact with a charging mat-based junk. It seems to be on the verge of entering the consumer space too.Since when is wireless charging "next generation"? Android phones have had it for half a decade.
Touch ID is the least of their concerns. Have you ever used a device (with regularity) that has a software home button? Its a disaster.
[doublepost=1461350146][/doublepost]
Where any/all of your arguments fail is on the premise that this is true. Not only is it not true, its laughable.
I'm not going to argue hardware specs and preferences. Just because one company does one thing another does another, doesn't make either right wrong good bad or otherwise.
Samsung devices are unusable because they run Android, unfortunately.
You forgot about the antenna lines being moved.Wait, wireless charging isn't coming this year?
So what is the big upgrade? Taking away the headphone jack?
Wow.
I still don't understand how bezels bother people so much.
wireless charging on android is like call those rolling things "hoverboards" it's just plain inaccurate.Since when is wireless charging "next generation"? Android phones have had it for half a decade.
It charges without having to plug a wire into your phone. Wireless = you don't need a wire.wireless charging on android is like call those rolling things "hoverboards" it's just plain inaccurate.
Where is the speaker hole for phone calls, or does this turn into a Blue Tooth Handset only kind of device?
Where is the facetime camera? Do we have camera tech yet that works from behind the screen without impacting the screen or camera?
How do you grip it without unintended touches registering? And even if the software has new kinds of touch rejection logic, do you want it spending CPU cycles and extra battery constantly processing and dismissing those irrelevant touches?
How would you put a case on it, if so inclined? Something that only squeezes the sides or maybe uses adhesive onto the back? And you wouldn't be able to have a protective front lip without impairing the ability to touch content at the edges.
Where is the easy-for-everyone-to-understand-and-find button that they can always rely on to escape out of an app?
How will you check the time and recent notifications? If it's just by touching the screen, how do you avoid wasting battery by powering up the screen from handling it all the other times?
But the Android OS sucks big time so nobody reading macrumors should give a ****.Since when is wireless charging "next generation"? Android phones have had it for half a decade.
The Palm Pre had wireless charging and that came out in 2010, so actually it's been around for more than half a decade.
Wireless charging thru the air with your iPhone in your front pocket? Not unless you want cancer in your balls. It sounds cool but I do not have faith in Apple these days to implement anything innovative - perhaps another shade of PINK color for the iPhone, yes.
You obviously haven't seen the company they bought and what they've developed. And please, enough with radio frequencies causing cancer, we've got RF everywhere and have done for hundreds of years now.
Pretty clear I will not replace my iPhone 4 with iPhone 7 but with the iPhone 8
Marketing psychology suggests you would not want to do that.Getting an iPhone SE is even more tempting now...3.5 mm headphone jack and a relatively inexpensive way to hold you over for a few years.
Also, I kind of feel like they need to drop the numbers now. iPhone 8, with the A11 chip running iOS 10. Just do like you did with the iPhone SE and call it "iPhone" and "iPhone Plus" and identify it by year of release if your selling the old models at a cheaper price.
Hundreds of years...lol. Love these posts.
The wireless telegraph was developed in the 1890's. So not hundreds of years.You obviously haven't seen the company they bought and what they've developed. And please, enough with radio frequencies causing cancer, we've got RF everywhere and have done for hundreds of years now.
The home button is living on borrowed time.
Needs to go, takes up too much space
I don't care who disagrees but Samsung's phones are far ahead of Apple in many ways. In screen technology, in features, and in design. There is nothing missing from their phones especially with the S7 and edge. They wouldn't have nearly flawless reviews for nothing.