I prefer SS in watches, but didn't want to pay the money for a 1st gen product, like many on here. So I bought a 42mm sport with blue band. I enjoyed the watch for a week, then realized I could sell it for SS money, so I craigslisted it and have a SS on order. I would have been happy to keep the watch if I couldn't sell it. I only regret not ordering both on 4/10 to re-sell the Sport to fund the SS. It didn't occur to me then that there would be a lucrative secondary market.
I think if you are in the USA get the SS it's only $200 more. In Canada forget it, it's 300 more after tax.
I'm just wondering ...
This thread appears to consist of two groups.
The ones that have the Sport model and think or thought there are missing out.
The ones that bought the SS model and think it was too expensive to justify the purchase.
I'm still waiting for my SS model, my worry is not the absolute price tag, but the idea that I could buy a lot of other fun things for over $900.
I really hope I will not fall into group two, because I have to say I really don't like the Sport model, but I might also be disappointed by the SS.
If a few months will be gone by, we might all realise that Apple sold us a miniature iOS device without any real qualities of a watch.
I haven't worn a watch in 20+ years and might be looking into real watches if I don't think Apple delivered a solid product.
This sounds even more strange, but a watch you can hand down has more appeal than a small electronic device that will be obsolete anyways.
I'll let you know when I get mine, my skepticism grows not because of the product itself, but the realisation that this is not a something I like to hang on to. It has no long term value as far as I'm concerned.
What are sport users missing out on? Nothing.
Not just any old Stainless Steel - but Jony Ive's specially designed 1000 series Mimetic Polyalloy.
It does take some getting used to. I have hairy wrists, so tucking the tail of the band is actually quite painful as it grabs the hairs. Of all the bands Apple could have done a better job designing the sport.
The one thing they absolutely got right is the decision to address the rubber strap problem of the dangling tail as it wears over time. This tuck design solves this forever.
wonder how many folks here were previous watch owners... not bashing the sport watch but a) aluminum is not a good material for a watch (because it will get banged into stuff eventually - hence no major watch maker uses aluminum) and b) mineral glass will scratch ... hence fine watches uses sapphire
once you are aware of these two limitations the sport watch is probably a great value but I'm tired of hearing complaints about dings/nicks in the aluminum body or scratches on the glass.... what did people expect?? thatcreates some magic aluminum alloy or glass?
wonder how many folks here were previous watch owners... not bashing the sport watch but a) aluminum is not a good material for a watch (because it will get banged into stuff eventually - hence no major watch maker uses aluminum) and b) mineral glass will scratch ... hence fine watches uses sapphire
once you are aware of these two limitations the sport watch is probably a great value but I'm tired of hearing complaints about dings/nicks in the aluminum body or scratches on the glass.... what did people expect?? thatcreates some magic aluminum alloy or glass?
IIf a few months will be gone by, we might all realise that Apple sold us a miniature iOS device without any real qualities of a watch.
Bought both.
Thinking I will keep the sport and sell the SS
The $300 Canadian price difference is too big for what it is. As someone else pointed out in another thread... make no mistake this is a consumer electronic product first, jewelry second. So you're really spending $580 after tax on an Apple watch, and a further $300 on a piece of jewelry.
And in my mind, the Apple watch isn't up there yet as a jewelry. On the days that I really need to dress up, I won't choose to put on the Apple watch for looks, other watches look far better. Even with all the fancy materials... the Apple watch isn't the best looking watch out there. It's really not.
Not sold.
Bought both.
Thinking I will keep the sport and sell the SS
The $300 Canadian price difference is too big for what it is. As someone else pointed out in another thread... make no mistake this is a consumer electronic product first, jewelry second. So you're really spending $580 after tax on an Apple watch, and a further $300 on a piece of jewelry.
And in my mind, the Apple watch isn't up there yet as a jewelry. On the days that I really need to dress up, I won't choose to put on the Apple watch for looks, other watches look far better. Even with all the fancy materials... the Apple watch isn't the best looking watch out there. It's really not.
Not sold.
I look forward to day Sport and SS owners can shake hands and say "Hey, nice watch!"