Apple's MacBook line has become a bit of a mess of overlapping products around the 13" thin and light section of the market, and has very little choice elsewhere. Personally I think they need a complete re-think and to come up with a complete new lineup with each model having a clear purpose.Yep but the 15”mbp is a workstation with comparable specs. It’s just too thin to allow for the performance without overheating.
Apple's MacBook line has become a bit of a mess of overlapping products around the 13" thin and light section of the market, and has very little choice elsewhere. Personally I think they need a complete re-think and to come up with a complete new lineup with each model having a clear purpose.
MacBook Pro:
- Power focused. Single 15" Model. Similar to Unibody generation, allowing a degree of upgradability and having greater capacity to cool more powerful internals. Starting at $2,499.
MacBook:
- General use. Basically a re-branding of the Retina Pro models from 2012-2015. Put something like a 28W i7-8559U inside and replace TB2 with TB3/USB C. Offer in 13" and 15" sizes. Starting at $1,299 and $1,499.
MacBook Air:
- Portability focused. Re-brand the 12" MacBook and offer it as the smaller variant alongside the 13" Air. Perhaps the first to transition to A series chips. Starting from $999 (12") and $1,099 (13")
Still 5 separate computer lines, but offers a broader selection and a clearer use case for each machine. Powerful workstation, reasonably powerful all-rounders and thin and light ultraportables.
As far as my own needs go, I don’t need a lot of power at all, but I do want a 15” laptop form factor. In this way the lineup immediately lets me down because my only option is to shell out a lot of money for power I don’t need in the 15” pro.Since my first Powerbook [the TI one] and many more since, the range was never about creating workstations. The basic premise of the computers has not changed in 20 years, but what has is what other manufacturers are doing.
I have zero expectations on Apple changing the nature of the pro series laptops and trying to make / wish for change is futile. Get the competition if you think you need more power, but doing a spec by spec comparison [at full price] you will be very surprised how the current Apple range stacks up.
I was [and still am] fully ready to use Windows for my business, but there just isn't enough 'extra' in the competition to make me do it.
If you truly need a lot of power, like I do, use a desktop, and have a laptop for the lighter work. It is a great combination.
And if you really need workstation power on the go, certainly buy a MSI / HP / Dell mobile workstation - they will be faster than the MacBook Pro without a doubt.
Apple's MacBook line has become a bit of a mess of overlapping products around the 13" thin and light section of the market, and has very little choice elsewhere. Personally I think they need a complete re-think and to come up with a complete new lineup with each model having a clear purpose.
MacBook Pro:
- Power focused. Single 15" Model. Similar to Unibody generation, allowing a degree of upgradability and having greater capacity to cool more powerful internals. Starting at $2,499.
MacBook:
- General use. Basically a re-branding of the Retina Pro models from 2012-2015. Put something like a 28W i7-8559U inside and replace TB2 with TB3/USB C. Offer in 13" and 15" sizes. Starting at $1,299 and $1,499.
MacBook Air:
- Portability focused. Re-brand the 12" MacBook and offer it as the smaller variant alongside the 13" Air. Perhaps the first to transition to A series chips. Starting from $999 (12") and $1,099 (13")
Still 5 separate computer lines, but offers a broader selection and a clearer use case for each machine. Powerful workstation, reasonably powerful all-rounders and thin and light ultraportables.
As I read it, I guess we are almost saying the same thing. The big difference is that I do not see Apple making something that is upgradable ever again. Nor do I see them going away from thin and light. The market does not want it.
Blasphemer!guys, there are a lot of great pc laptops at CES this year. give them a look.
The market might want it if it was offered.A starving man may eat garbage, but that doesn't mean he prefers it over normal food. "The market's" insistence on non-upgradable, subscription-based consumer lock-in is a sham.
Well to be clear I don’t think they will do this, it’s mainly my opinion on how they should reorganise to give some structure back to a lineup that currently feels like they’ve been adjusting it on the fly, just reacting to how people are buying, not giving a clear direction of travel.This would be nice, but unfortunately will never happen. Judging by what other manufacturers in addition to Apple are doing, the market wants thin and light over performance. If you look at competing PCs such as the X1E and XPS 15, they are all getting thinner and squeezing more into a smaller chassis while sacrificing cooling resulting in thermal throttling. Everyone is following the trend Apple has set, and the market is rewarding them for it. The difference is, Dell, HP, and Lenovo have institutional contracts that justify making the less portable workstation that mass market consumers have rejected. Apple simply cannot justify a machine like that. The market is not large enough.
I think what we will see is a culling of the line going forward. The TouchBar MacBook Pros stick around as they are and the non-TouchBar get discontinued. The MacBook and MacBook Air lines either combine, or the MacBook goes down market in price. I think Apple intended for the MacBook to replace the Air and has gone back on that. That would give you a three-tier lineup where the MacBook is your budget option or super thin/light, MacBook Air the mainstream option, and the Pro as the high end in both price and performance.
As I read it, I guess we are almost saying the same thing. The big difference is that I do not see Apple making something that is upgradable ever again. Nor do I see them going away from thin and light. The market does not want it.
The market might want it if it was offered.A starving man may eat garbage, but that doesn't mean he prefers it over normal food. "The market's" insistence on non-upgradable, subscription-based consumer lock-in is a sham.
Well to be clear I don’t think they will do this, it’s mainly my opinion on how they should reorganise to give some structure back to a lineup that currently feels like they’ve been adjusting it on the fly, just reacting to how people are buying, not giving a clear direction of travel.
Ultimately I think their vision of consumer computing is the iPad, where this leaves the MacBook, Air and even nTB pro I’m not sure. At the higher end I do think they would benefit from making a machine that has some capacity to be end user upgradable, at least as far as replacing the RAM, battery and maybe even the SSD if they use a standard M.2 slot. This is both in line with their environmental agenda, and is something I see quite a few enthusiasts at least, mention they miss from the unibody machines.
ASUS Studiobook S 16:10 and great spec, seriously nice, easily puts the MBP to shame being a notebook actually designed for professional use...
Apple mounting the SSD directly on the Logic Board is a joke for a notebook aimed at professional use. Vast majority of my contracts and for that matter majority of companies have a level of data control. Handing over same data to Apple in the event of a failure is simply not going to happen, it's like they have no clue...
Q-6
In a parallel world Jobs is still alive, Apple are making ones similar to those, and MR users are all singing Apple's praises.
Screen was what sold me on preordering the 2012 MBP, still hanging on to it. If Apple manages to make a screen substantially better than the competition, I'm game.
Yeah, I know what you mean, I've been using Macs intermittently since he Mac SE, and full bore at the iMac Bondi Blue days. I don't even know how many years that is. I'm surprised I lasted this long, but I think that was because I fell into the frog/tepid water trick. Now that I'm on the outside looking in, I have to say how much better other laptops are.Over 20 years with the Mac, what a sad state of affairs
There are a number of great PC manufacturers. I love the Thinkpad Line myself.Blasphemer!
There are a number of great PC manufacturers. I love the Thinkpad Line myself.
But the whole integration of MacOS with my iPhone and iPad are unbeatable for my usability. I cannot find that kind of integration on the PC side. The MacBook Pro’s are always sleek and gorgeous. I love my MacBook Pro’s keyboard. The touch bar is ok.
Pick the tool that works for you. Enjoy it! Life is short!
But looks, MacOS, and integration with all their iDevices are mostly what Apple has going for it these days and why people stick with it. Mostly the integration/ecosystem.
I agree, I use Office 365 with One Drive and One Note across my killer desktop PC, late '13 iMac, iPhones and iPad. I deleted all of the Apple apps off of my devices. Don't miss anything.I'm not going to miss that integration one bit:
1. Messages - yeah, this is cool and works well, although I'm getting an average of 0.1 iMessage a day.
2. Calls - almost never works, usually when I click accept the call disconnects and I fumble to find my phone and call back whoever it was. When it actually connects I sound supposedly like deep inside a water well, quiet with some reverb or echo added and I'm asked to call back again, this time using a phone.
3. Handoff - I don't always do real work on the phone or tablet, but when I do, the stuff I was working on is already synced to the cloud and dowloaded to laptop by the time I put the phone down, and the same the other way around. Not to mention that while it works well with native apps (which I don't use) you need to have a matching pair of third party apps and I was having issues to make it work consistently in such scenario, even if it was only to see if it works.
4. Clipboard - never used, have trouble imagining a situation that would require it.
5. Instant Hotspot - come on, that's two gestures on the phone to open up regular hotspot. I'd be ashamed to even market it as a feature.
Did I miss something? Or maybe I'm just not using it right.
I'm not going to miss that integration one bit:
1. Messages - yeah, this is cool and works well, although I'm getting an average of 0.1 iMessage a day.
2. Calls - almost never works, usually when I click accept the call disconnects and I fumble to find my phone and call back whoever it was. When it actually connects I sound supposedly like deep inside a water well, quiet with some reverb or echo added and I'm asked to call back again, this time using a phone.
3. Handoff - I don't always do real work on the phone or tablet, but when I do, the stuff I was working on is already synced to the cloud and dowloaded to laptop by the time I put the phone down, and the same the other way around. Not to mention that while it works well with native apps (which I don't use) you need to have a matching pair of third party apps and I was having issues to make it work consistently in such scenario, even if it was only to see if it works.
4. Clipboard - never used, have trouble imagining a situation that would require it.
5. Instant Hotspot - come on, that's two gestures on the phone to open up regular hotspot. I'd be ashamed to even market it as a feature.
Did I miss something? Or maybe I'm just not using it right.
I forgot about that, somebody calls and I have stuff ringing from the basement to the bedroom floor. WHICH ONE IS THE PHONE????? To make matters worse, the actual phone is always the last to start ringing, by good ten seconds or so, like if they did it on purpose just to mess with you.Same goes with the answering calls. And honestly its a huge annoyance at times because a call will ring on my phone, watch and computer at the same time, but if I answer it from my phone (novel concept right?) i get a stuck ring on my computer that just goes on like a broken record for several minutes.
I forgot about that, somebody calls and I have stuff ringing from the basement to the bedroom floor. WHICH ONE IS THE PHONE????? To make matters worse, the actual phone is always the last to start ringing, by good ten seconds or so, like if they did it on purpose just to mess with you.