None of what you are saying is fact. And most of it is untrue. You keep trying to imply that your "opinion" is somehow gospel or fact. It is not. And your attempts to say it over and over doesn't change anything.
It's funny hat you would accuse other people of "bias and jealousy" but yourself are unable to critically look at a product. First of all, everything that
@booksbooks says about the Surface book is factually correct and is either clear from the specs or from independent tests. To add some of my personal criticisms:
- the Surface Book uses a slower 15Watt CPU, which is a design compromise since the tablet part of it simply wouldn't be able to accommodate anything faster
- the Surface Book lacks professional I/O (thunderbolt)
- the Surface Book lacks fast WiFi (as do all Windows laptops though)
- the 13" Surface Book 2 overall volume is comparable to a 15" MBP, and its 50% thicker than the MBP at the hinge: the 15" MBP will fit in slim messenger bags where the Surface Book 2 won't
Overall, its a solid 2-in-1 computer and the fast GPU is a plus (although I still think that pairing a fast GPU and a slow CPU is a strange design), but this computer makes a lot of sacrifices to achieve its 2-in-1 functionality and omits pro-level features (like fast I/O) for no apparent reason.
One comparable Windows PC is the Dell XPS 15, with the same processor, RAM, storage, and a comparable GPU for $1500. A 40% difference in price. This is pretty much how it is all across the various selections, regardless of 13" or 15".
Sure, except Dell's professional version of the XPS is called Precision 5530 and that one currently costs $2,709.00 (on special offer) for comparable config, so more or less identical to the MBP.
Internal construction wise, the MBP is much closer to the Precision and uses more expensive components and a more complex board layout than the XPS (just compare pictures of the logic boards of the two laptops). MBP has more thunderbolt controllers, a hardware GPU multiplexer (like Precision), better WiFi chip, advanced surge protection, custom manufactured GPU (thats not a cheap thing to have), and I don't know what else, not counting custom Apple coprocessors and stuff like the Touch Bar of course.
And please don't get me wrong: I am not trying to claim that the MBP is 40% "better" than the XPS in any regard. I am simply pointing out that the price difference is not just due to Apple charging some arbitrary high amount of money, but because the MBP is actually a significantly more expensive product to make. Whether it makes it any better in practice is a different question and its up to the user whether they want to pay more money for some engineering features they probably won't notice.