Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ah, you spoiled my fun. I was waiting for someone to find fault with Apple making acquisitions before dropping the Google hammer.

- Since 1988 Apple has acquired 92 companies (inc Shazam if it’s confirmed).

- Since 2001 Google has acquired some 210 companies (I might be off by a couple, but it’s over 200 for sure).

Of all the tech companies out there, Google, BY FAR, is the leader in acquisitions. Literally every single product they have (outside of Search), was acquired. Their rate of acquisitions per year is 4X higher than Apple.

Android, YouTube, Maps, Gmail, Docs, Ads - all acquired. Further, each of these major products has had numerous follow-up acquisitions to add additional functionality.

If acquiring companies is somehow bad, or implies a lack of innovation (buying tech instead of developing it yourself), then Google is the least innovative tech company out there. All they do is buy tech and incorporate it into their products.

Indeed. I didn't even realize how terribly bad Google is at innovating, until you brought up the acquisition numbers!

Going by Apple haters' logic, this means that Google really cannot innovate at all.
 
Ah, you spoiled my fun. I was waiting for someone to find fault with Apple making acquisitions before dropping the Google hammer.

- Since 1988 Apple has acquired 92 companies (inc Shazam if it’s confirmed).

- Since 2001 Google has acquired some 210 companies (I might be off by a couple, but it’s over 200 for sure).

Of all the tech companies out there, Google, BY FAR, is the leader in acquisitions. Literally every single product they have (outside of Search), was acquired. Their rate of acquisitions per year is 4X higher than Apple.

Android, YouTube, Maps, Gmail, Docs, Ads - all acquired. Further, each of these major products has had numerous follow-up acquisitions to add additional functionality.


If acquiring companies is somehow bad, or implies a lack of innovation (buying tech instead of developing it yourself), then Google is the least innovative tech company out there. All they do is buy tech and incorporate it into their products.

Can we also compare how many of each company's acquisitions remain cross platform as opposed to the company killing support for all OS except their own?
 
So I guess they will be killing support for all non-Apple platforms?

Maybe you aren't aware of it, but Apple Music is multi-platform. Shazam has been downloaded a billion times and fits right in with Apple's approach to music. Indeed, as revealed by many of the posters on the forum, most folks didn't realize that Apple had already integrated it into iOS and had been a great feature of Siri's that worked extremely well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the johnmc
Ah, you spoiled my fun. I was waiting for someone to find fault with Apple making acquisitions before dropping the Google hammer.

- Since 1988 Apple has acquired 92 companies (inc Shazam if it’s confirmed).

- Since 2001 Google has acquired some 210 companies (I might be off by a couple, but it’s over 200 for sure).

Of all the tech companies out there, Google, BY FAR, is the leader in acquisitions. Literally every single product they have (outside of Search), was acquired. Their rate of acquisitions per year is 4X higher than Apple.

Android, YouTube, Maps, Gmail, Docs, Ads - all acquired. Further, each of these major products has had numerous follow-up acquisitions to add additional functionality.


If acquiring companies is somehow bad, or implies a lack of innovation (buying tech instead of developing it yourself), then Google is the least innovative tech company out there. All they do is buy tech and incorporate it into their products.

See..... if you think apple and google are the same , excellent valid point.

The catch here is that Apple was know for innovation, while google was always knows for just search and buying companies .

So given Apple has now bought half as much as google ..... this is where the snide remarks are coming from.

You buy when you have poor product vision
And start meddling in everything, like google, and this is what Apple is doing .... so sorry I see the point your were making , though those stats actually go against Apple under Cook .....
 
So will "beat shazam" be an Apple Exclusive too? I can see them doing that show via Apple TV now.
 
This is bad, because it's proof that Apple simply can't improve Siri without acquisitions.

How is that "proof"? Even assuming you mean evidence, not proof, acquiring one ability does not at all mean nothing else is being done. The only thing it shows is that was more expedient to acquire this service rather than re-implement it. It doesn't say anything about any other aspect of Siri.

It's a sensible approach. Why spent time effort and money to have it in the future when they can acquire it today for less than the cost of 12 hours of iPhone sales?
 
I have a feeling that Apple's idea of 'exciting plans' is to have Siri always listening and telling you what song it's hearing directly on the lockscreen. If I'm not mistaken, a few Android phones (or maybe just one) already do that. That seems more like a gimmick than a useful feature to me. Maybe it's just me, but there's only about one time per year that I want to pick up my phone and find out what song is playing around me. I certainly don't want a feature like that to be always-on, cluttering up my already mess of a lockscreen.
So you make up an imaginary situation in your head, not yet confirmed, then proceed to dismiss it as a gimmick, than explain your personal issue with it.
Brilliant.
 
Apple will buy everyone and Apple will have monopole

Monopole or monocle?

EA5A669A-A858-4B5E-AB42-CAF4647B19E5.gif
 
I'm not sure why anyone would think this is bad news for the Android version, they're missing the point.

Shazam as a brand fits well with Beats and with Apple. It's Android user base is also a compelling reason to purchase it. They can use it as a venue to promote Apple Music and Beats branded products through tight integrations.

All about that halo effect. Get people into Apple products on third party systems and they'll come over to the Apple ecosystem. Shazam will work well for that.

This is a boon for Siri and a strike against both Google and Spotify. It's smart business.
 
I just want to know if they will change the "Beat Shazam" game show name. :)
 
There’s nothing wrong with Workflow.

Yep, it's continued to improve, and I suspect (like many), at some point it'll provide access to previously unavailable resources.


First order of business is to **** up the UI~

The [existing] UI is a _mess_, and that doesn't even factor in the ads (that cover song lists, etc.) I think there's mostly room for +improvement+.


I have a feeling that Apple's idea of 'exciting plans' is to have Siri always listening [...]

Siri already does this, we have to whisper all the time, it's evil, I can just _feel_ it ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mookc1
Reminds me of when they acquired Siri when it was an app (which most people either don’t know, or forgot), well, except that Shazam is much more popular. I’m sure they’re integrating it into iOS somehow.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.