This exactly!
I do not understand the AIR rumours, they have said clear and loud that the entry level MBP replaces the AIR. It is an OK powerful machine and it is very portable. The MacBook being the new ultra portable device, sacrificing performance for portability.
The only thing that makes sense for Apple to make is a budget laptop. There is no way for them to make a device that would somehow sit in-between the MacBook and MBP at the moment; any device that would outperform in portability and performance would cannibalise the market of the other two. A budget laptop on the other hand makes a lot of sense. We have seen a lot of the same happening in the iPad, iPhone segment. They have just introduced a cheap version of iPad, that is lacking in some regard, but it makes it for it in price. So I would guess the only thing that could come out is some sort of MacBook analogue in a bigger shell along the lines of MBP. Probably either improving battery life or disk space. The screen on the other hand seems a mystery, for sure it would have to be a retina or something close. They just can introduce in 2018 the same type of screen that the current MBA has.
Right, the Air follow-on needs some type of screen upgrade.
It does make sense for the nTB MacBook Pro to be discontinued and merged into this rumored MacBook Air replacement. MBP then has at least 28W quad-core, Touch Bar and Thunderbolt 3 as differentiating features, and starts at $1,799 for 8GB/128GB.
But the problem is then the cannibalization you mention if Apple were to release a retina 8GB/128GB at $999. What makes the same config in MBP worth $800 more? I’m not sure a faster CPU, Touch Bar and TB3 are enough.
That’s why I don’t think the $999 entry level is retina 8GB/128GB. I think something like 1920 x 1200 is more likely. Retina available at a more expensive tier, starting around $1,199.
The CPU is something of a mystery. I can’t see quad-core across the board for a product line that starts at $999. So is there a new dual-core SKU from Intel in the 8x50-U series? Or it could use an older 7x60-U part but that would be kind of weird since it would have faster base clocks and better GPU performance than the more expensive quads.
So maybe 7x60-U using 9.5W cTDP-down, which would give better battery life and have CPU/GPU performance that would slot in below the quad-cores. The 8x50-U quad-core tier could start at maybe $1,399.
So you’d have something like:
$999 1920 x 1200, dual-core (max 8GB RAM)
$1,199 retina, dual-core
$1,399 retina, quad-core