How am I being slanted? Apple is standing behind their products NOW, that's not the argument. The issue is with them waiting until 2015 to acknowledge and assist users that had problems in 2014.
You make a good point, this IS entirely voluntary, and I'm not basing my opinion solely on numbers because I can't get those numbers. There is an implied subjectivity or principle at work here. Apple is under no obligation to help users who's systems died after the warranty expired, but there IS a principle that they should stand by their products which are implied to be (and priced accordingly) among the highest quality in the industry.
sualpine, I am big enough to admit that you win this argument. I cannot argue in a completely logical sense with hard numbers that Apple has done anything wrong. Only an implied principle, but not everything in life is determined by hard numbers. There are non-quantifiable factors (such as user satisfaction and customer perception) that can be affected.
I think Apple waited to long. That is my opinion and (like my signature states) doesn't matter to you or anyone else. I cannot back up my belief with any numbers for you. I'm sorry.
---
EDIT: that is also why much of the law (which I am studying, but am by no means an expert) includes clauses that account for reasonableness tests on a case by case basis, because not everything can be quantified neatly.