Actually a true Audiophile would tell you that at higher bit-rates, such as Apple's AAC at 256 kbps the difference between a lossless file and a compressed file is virtually indistinguishable, and multiple ABX blind tests support this theory. Let me guess, you also think HD 24/96 Audio sounds better, right?
What makes all the difference in the world are your speakers and the quality of the mastering your file has.
Actually, no, that's not what a true audiophile would tell you - because it would depend ENTIRELY on the music that is being compressed whether or not 256 kbps would be enough to be indistinguishable (hint, if you listen to music with lots of cymbals, they can sound like they're in a drainage pipe at that bitrate). If you're listening to some godawful pop music, it's not going to matter. Let me guess, you can't have a discussion about anything without attempting to insult someone else's knowledge?
The best speakers in the world aren't going to sound very good when hooked up to that 3.5mm headphone jack on your last iPhone. Is it becoming clearer now?
[doublepost=1474328572][/doublepost]
Adaptors aren't a solution to a problem that never existed! Bluetooth is not the answer either as wireless headphones need charging. If they dropped lightning for USB-C and kept the 3.5mm jack, that would be fine.
I agree with you on the last part. Just don't see any of this normalizing until after a couple of years of shuffling from all companies involved. Samsung wants to create a proprietary port just to compete...should tell you where the competition's mind is at.