Yeah, that would be great for those who haven't bought the mighty because of the less-than-mighty cable...AvSRoCkCO1067 said:Along with some imminent upgrades to the PM (and possibly the PB), we might also finally see a bt mighty.
Yeah, that would be great for those who haven't bought the mighty because of the less-than-mighty cable...AvSRoCkCO1067 said:Along with some imminent upgrades to the PM (and possibly the PB), we might also finally see a bt mighty.
aricher said:PhotoPro is coming. Apple needs to get on the ball with this asap. iPhoto is just not robust enough professional shops. I would prefer an Apple pro app any day over Extensis Portfolio or PhotoMechanic.
They'll probably do some incremental update to iPhoto at the same time - hmmm - maybe single photo printing (not books) or a way for guests to request prints/books from .mac photo albums/slideshows. I can't tell you how many times people look at my .mac slideshows and say that they would order prints if they could. Pain in the @$$ for me.
aplmd said:It seems odd for Apple to call a media event next week for small processor upgrades if any. Now wouldn't this just blow everyone away??
Church said:Liquid metal cooled? The russians already tried that with their nuclear subs to get them powered. It wasn't pretty. Other than that, go mini pro!
![]()
fklehman said:Very true. I still use GraphicConverter for a lot of photo-related activities because A) the program is smaller and easier to work with and B) My Pismo would shoot itself in the head trying to run Photoshop. Even when I get a new PB next week (PLEASE STEVE), I will probably still use GC just 'cause I'm used to it and because the PS interface is wicked complex. I'm not a pro-user, so GC works ok for my needs. Maybe an Apple pro photo application would hit that sweet spot in the middle? We'll have to see.
AvSRoCkCO1067 said:Along with some imminent upgrades to the PM (and possibly the PB), we might also finally see a bt mighty.
~Shard~ said:Not until MWSF I'm thinking. If Apple just started shipping the wired Mighty Mouse with the new iMacs, they aren't going to turn around the next week and offer a BT version, not unless they then update the iMac so you can choose (which wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility I suppose....). Nonetheless, I think it's still a little early for the BT Mighty Mouse, and I think we won't see it until '06.
BenRoethig said:Or a big brother to the Mini. Think Cube 2.0 with similar specs to the iMac.
powerbook911 said:I have to agree with you. Furthermore, from the information I read, after the mighty mouse came out, it is going to be a bit of a challenge to make the BT mighty mouse. It seems there is a lot more space taken inside the Mighty Mouse than the previous Apple Pro Mice, which left the person in the article I read wondering: where will the batteries go, in the BT version?
I think SJ plucked what he considered a reasonable date out of thin air and told his team to meet it or beat it. Being conservative is not how you generate momentum internally or enthusiasm in the audience.savar said:I think you're right. Mid 2006 had to have been a conservative estimate...I think there's good probability we see them winter or spring. The sooner the better since I'm already saving up for it...
~Shard~ said:Not until MWSF I'm thinking. If Apple just started shipping the wired Mighty Mouse with the new iMacs, they aren't going to turn around the next week and offer a BT version, not unless they then update the iMac so you can choose (which wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility I suppose....). Nonetheless, I think it's still a little early for the BT Mighty Mouse, and I think we won't see it until '06.
pigwin32 said:I think SJ plucked what he considered a reasonable date out of thin air and told his team to meet it or beat it. Being conservative is not how you generate momentum internally or enthusiasm in the audience.
Apple really only has to pay lip service to you loyal apple fans; you're going to be loyal regardless. Sure you might moan a bit but you're probably here for the long haul.lcde said:I guess i just can't believe that Apple would throw away their last PPC models. These models have to keep us loyal apple fans for 6 months to a year. Personally a portable pro machine fits in much nicer to the whole apple mindset than the powermacs.
I don't know, although I know I can put an avatar on mine and I have just over 1,000 posts. I was checking last night and a lot of the Demi Gods who post here seem to have a varying total number of posts from just over 1,000 to 4,000 and some of them post up to 4 times a day on average. I post about 1.2 times on average. I think it might be something to do with the informative content of your posts.Tupring said:How many posts do you need to be able to have an avatar anyway? I sent an email to the webmaster but never got a reply
winmacguy said:I don't know, although I know I can put an avatar on mine and I have just over 1,000 posts. I was checking last night and a lot of the Demi Gods who post here seem to have a varying total number of posts from just over 1,000 to 4,000 and some of them post up to 4 times a day on average. I post about 1.2 times on average. I think it might be something to do with the informative content of your posts.
New eMac?paulypants said:Ya'know, at some point they will address the 600$ gab between the highest mini and the lowest iMac with something...
Wow, its been gone for what, a week? And now people want a "comeback"Plymouthbreezer said:New eMac?
I'd love to see an all-in-one CRT Mac make a comeback, just for the sake of taking over the education market.
Just curious--what about Front Row requires more power?~Shard~ said:The Mac mini currently doesn't have the horsepower to run Front Row
That's interesting to note, for sure.AidenShaw said:Apple is telling developers to program for Dothan-based systems....
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/1740048/
I agree--they can't afford to wait for the ultimate next generation--and the rest of the PC world isn't sitting still waiting for that either. Meanwhile, even a current Pentium M would make a nice PowerBook compared to the G4.AidenShaw said:But Apple isn't waiting for Yonah across the board, and it certainly isn't waiting for Merom (although IMHO it would be a good idea to wait for Merom over the long term).
I think these are people who would like a faster computer, but CAN make do with some old Mac they have lying around for a few weeks, in order to make it happen. Selling ahead of time gets you more $$$ for your old computer than selling late. Some people know they can do without speed for a short time, and reap the benefits later. What's so wrong with that if it's the right choice for their needs?AidenShaw said:I just don't understand all the posts from people who sit around with no computer, because they sold their last one because it wasn't fast enough and they're waiting and hoping for something better.
Does it make more sense with a glass of Kool-Aid ?![]()
Agreed. A LOT of what gets done on computers (Safari, Mail, iLife) was Intel-native months ago. A lot more has been done since then. There were stories of pretty big apps, even games, being ported quickly. "No software" is a huge exaggeration. Of course we don't hear about the software much because there ARE no Intel Macs yetSouthernboy said:Why do I keep reading that there's no software ready for MacIntels? Truth is we simply don't know. Some xcode based developers are probably ready to go; others will follow very quickly, except for Quark who'll probably take a few years![]()