This is talking about the 16” MacBook Pro that launched in June sporting an updated 5600m GPU. The 2019 revision only went to 5500m
The cooling design would have been fine for the cpus that Intel promised but never delivered.The cooling design of all the latest MBPs and MBAs are so bad that I'm left wondering if it's a deliberate ploy to make the forthcoming Apple silicon Macs look better than they actually will be!
What, like the 2020 MBA with no heat pipe at all? So the fan churns at the slightest bit of CPU usage. Making it utterly pointless to spend your money on anything other than the base CPU.The cooling design would have been fine for the cpus that Intel promised but never delivered.
What, like the 2020 MBA with no heat pipe at all? So the fan churns at the slightest bit of CPU usage. Making it utterly pointless to spend your money on anything other than the base CPU.
If only folks would read the prior posts before saying the same thing someone else said 15 times already, and debunked at least that many times to boot. Sorry, just venting.Uhmmm. The 16” MacBook Pro technically had a minor refresh in May with the addition of the Radeon 5600M. It’s an additional 800 dollars and a core feature not available on prior machines. They could call it the MacBook Pro 16 2020 (1st half). Now who knows whether they will announce a new one in November.
I’d be surprised mostly due to supply chain challenges that currently persist.
They aren’t going to announce anymore intel macs at any events.What does this mean for ARM Macs? Are Intel and ARM Macs be announced in the same date/event?
Here’s the link again:
![]()
Apple announces Mac transition to Apple silicon
Apple today announced it will transition the Mac to its custom silicon to deliver industry-leading performance and powerful new technologies.www.apple.com
I am really curious what all the people complaining about not being able to do real work feel will be missing?
Every single tool I use is expected to be available from the start, including Xcode, BBEdit, Drafts, Photoshop, Lightroom and Microsoft Office.
I transitioned from 68k to PPC and from PPC to Intel on day one. It was fine, both times.
Sure, the MacOS 9 to Mac OS X transition was a little rocky. However, dual-booting, and later the Classic environment, ironed that out well enough, so it was fine too.
Doesn't matter if the software is written for intel. Emulation will more than negate the cpu speed advantage (if it works at all), and absolutely doesn't matter if it only runs on windows.dumb take. a14 is faster across-the-board than most intel chips, per core. And the version showing up in macs will be faster across-the-board than most intel chips, period.
Maybe we'll get lucky and Apple will come out and say 'this is the last 16" intel machine. Come and get it now while you can'If they do release an intel 10th gen refresh for the 16", it will probably be done before the event via a press release. Doubt they'd bother wasting time on a small refresh when focusing the event on the new silicon Macs.
Nobody gives a crap about windows on mac. If you want a windows machine, buy one. They’re like a hundred bucks.Doesn't matter if the software is written for intel. Emulation will more than negate the cpu speed advantage (if it works at all), and absolutely doesn't matter if it only runs on windows.
I am curious about this as well. Assuming we are going to see an updated MacBook Pro 16 in 2020, I think the question lies on whether or not AMD had sufficient supply when production of this updated 16-inch began, which I assume has already occurred if we are seeing a release in the next two months.With AMD set to announce 'Big Navi' on October 28, could we also see a 6000 series mobile GPU suitable for a decent bump in the MacBook Pro 16 later this week, possibly 10th Gen Intel and AMD RDNA2 6000 series GPU? 1080p FaceTime and nano-texture display options would be nice too.
Autocad. Solidworks. Visual studio.Nobody gives a crap about windows on mac. If you want a windows machine, buy one. They’re like a hundred bucks.
And rosetta on a14m will still be faster than running native on most intel macs. And eventually anything that matters will be ported.
Autocad. Solidworks. Visual studio.
my last company had tens of thousands of people running windows on Mac.
Please speak for yourself, I like many others absolute need windows for applications such as CAD, this would not run effectively on a cheap laptop, I want apple build quality and the option to use Mac OS, boot camp is a perfect compromise, I can see from other forums I’m not alone.Nobody gives a crap about windows on mac. If you want a windows machine, buy one. They’re like a hundred bucks.
And rosetta on a14m will still be faster than running native on most intel macs. And eventually anything that matters will be ported.
The cooling design of all the latest MBPs and MBAs are so bad that I'm left wondering if it's a deliberate ploy to make the forthcoming Apple silicon Macs look better than they actually will be!
Please speak for yourself, I like many others absolute need windows for applications such as CAD, this would not run effectively on a cheap laptop, I want apple build quality and the option to use Mac OS, boot camp is a perfect compromise, I can see from other forums I’m not alone.
The windows market is still massive compared to Mac, the idea that “everything that matter will be ported” in unrealistic to put it politely, many small apps never get a Mac equivalent.
Cook said at WWDC they still have Intel products to release. I don't think he was just talking about the 27" iMac.
I think that people are over optimistic about ARM MacBook Pro and replacing the whole Mac line it is going to be years before they could try to replace a Xeon processor in a Mac Pro. And once they do Bootcamp will end and people will get a Xbox X or PS5 for gaming and PC will be virtual which will be slower than bootcamp for business apps under virtual. The ARM is not some magic processor, it is going to help Apple force development into a IOS world where there are more apps and developers under iOS.