Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
rxse7en said:
2.66ghz C2D?
edit: nevermind must have been a typo as it's listed as 2.33ghz in your initial specs. My bad.


Sorry my mistake, we don't need any more surprises now for awhile.
 
AppliedVisual said:
Just based on the known info of Santa Rosa and the Crestline chipset, as well as other hardware that is available and will become more practical over the next several months, we can probably assume the following is guaranteed:

1. Being able to install a full 4GB of RAM and be able to use all of it!
2. 802.11n WiFi
3. 800MHz FSB options with faster Merom C2D CPUs and memory

...And these are possible:

1. NAND FLASH/CACHE
2. Blu-Ray Superdrive
3. Higher resolution screens
4. Updated GPU
5. eSATA
6. Magnetic latch
7. HD resolution iSight
8. Redesigned form factor w/ accessible HD bay and better cooling
9. Alternative WiFi/WiMax or cellular broadband support.
Everything yes. #9 has been listed as a component of Centrino Santa Rosa, its a good bet that if its easy to impelment it will happen. #7 though. HD isight....:rolleyes: ..... yeah have you seen the size of HD lens on portable camcorder. Plus just the cost. And itd be worthless, you wouldn't be able to transmit over iChat an HD quality feed because you don't have enought bit rate over the internet. So.... WHATS THE POINT?
 
Chef Medeski said:
#7 though. HD isight....:rolleyes: ..... yeah have you seen the size of HD lens on portable camcorder. Plus just the cost. And itd be worthless, you wouldn't be able to transmit over iChat an HD quality feed because you don't have enought bit rate over the internet. So.... WHATS THE POINT?

Intranet calls? I work on a large university campus that is made up of over 30 buildings. It would be amazing if I could do HD iChats to people all over the campus from my own office (our entire university network is gigabit).

So, I think HD iChat is a perfectly valid desire, although it has next to no chance of being implemented since the target market is so small.
 
Chef Medeski said:
Everything yes. #9 has been listed as a component of Centrino Santa Rosa, its a good bet that if its easy to impelment it will happen. #7 though. HD isight....:rolleyes: ..... yeah have you seen the size of HD lens on portable camcorder. Plus just the cost. And itd be worthless, you wouldn't be able to transmit over iChat an HD quality feed because you don't have enought bit rate over the internet. So.... WHATS THE POINT?

There are currently notebooks out there with 1.3 to 1.6 Megapixel cameras built in. My cell phone that fits in my pocket does 2Mpixel. Go look at Dell.com - 1.3Megapixel. 1280x720 HD is less than 1 Megapixel. I never said the quality would be great, I just said HD resolution... Apple is actually behind in this regard.

And what do you mean there's not enough bitrate over the internet for HD? I transfer HD res video all the time. You can stream HD res versions of the Apple commercials (or close to it) right off of their home page and they only need about 1Mbps. H.264 and VC1 are capable of transmitting 1080i/p HD res video with superior compression/quality vs. HDV in about 3 to 5 Mbps. I have a 10Mbps connection at my house for < $35/month after all taxes. Sure, lots of people still without decent broadband, but iSight does more than jsut video webchat. You can create video blogs and other downloadable media.
 
maverick808 said:
Intranet calls? I work on a large university campus that is made up of over 30 buildings. It would be amazing if I could do HD iChats to people all over the campus from my own office (our entire university network is gigabit).

So, I think HD iChat is a perfectly valid desire, although it has next to no chance of being implemented since the target market is so small.

Eaxactly... A prime example of what it could be used for. And why do you say it wouldn't be implemented? Dell already 1.3Mpixel cameras built into some of their notebooks.
 
Very excited...I've been lurking the forums for the past 2 months awaiting the updates. So here it is, proud new owner:

MBPRO 15/2.33 CTO
2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM-2x1GB
160GB Serial ATA Drive@5400rpm
SuperDrive 6X
15" Widescreen Display
BkLit Keyboard/Mac OS
Country Kit

Estimated Shipped By: November 1st
Estimated Delivery Date: November 8th

I'll now be selling my pristine Powerbook G4 on ebay... :)
 
In the US HE store I'm still seeing this under the configuration page:

" AppleCare Protection Plan (APP)
The AppleCare Protection Plan extends your computer's 90 days of complimentary support and one-year warranty to up to three years of world-class support."

No mention of the 3 year standard warranty. Where would it be located?
 
Zic said:
Just checked my order status.... My C2D MBP order has now shipped!!

I'm jealous.... I went for a BTO 160gb. Should be here by 7 Nov.

Just out of interest when did you order and did it originally say 4 days to ship?

I thought all the normal 15" configarations were ready to ship in 4 days and the BTO ones 5 days.
 
hard drive performance

I love it when people try to make themselves feel their 5400 rpm drives are as fast as a 7200 rpm drive because Applications load faster or something like that. People should remember that OSX is a UNIX system, and any UNIX system worth its salt caches all sorts of files to RAM. Those shared libraries aren't being loaded every time.. they're staying put. They're already loaded by the time you boot up. At least, the needed parts are. (OSX uses dynamic runtime binding. Which I hate, btw.) The only way to compare drive speeds is to do a real random read/write benchmark.

Not sure if anyone posted this yet, but http://www.barefeats.com/5472.html

Bottom line is that the 7200s can sustain an overall higher throughput but you may and may not notice differences when doing random stuff. I ordered my new MBP with the 7200 rpm drive because I like to go the fastest I can and never seem to have more than 50 gigs used up at any time.
 
camking said:
I'm jealous.... I went for a BTO 160gb. Should be here by 7 Nov.

Just out of interest when did you order and did it originally say 4 days to ship?

I thought all the normal 15" configarations were ready to ship in 4 days and the BTO ones 5 days.

I ordered it yesterday at 15:27 GMT+1 over the telephone with HE discount. I was told by the guy I spoke to that if I ordered over the phone he would mark it as a priority order, despite the 4 day wait as displayed on the website.

edit: wrong order time. fixed.
 
i am going to go for the stock 17" + applecare when it gets into the stores next week; no 7-10 business days + shipping wait time for me. hopefully.

tho if they have the 15" with the 160GB hard drive in the store i might consider that. im still wishywashy on which one.

BTW, will they take a check or cash in the apple retail stores? or just credit cards + money orders?
 
AppliedVisual said:
I have to disagree with this. I currently own and have owned various notebooks with the 100GB 5400rpm, 100GB 7200rpm, 120GB 5400rpm and now 160GB in my current MBP, Not including the new MBP I just ordered. Anyway, in any of my own tests/benchmarks, as well as most of what I've seen online, the 160GB drive is a good bit faster than the 100GB 7200rpm models. The 7200rpm drives can outpace the 160GB units in seek times, especially when reading from the outter extremeties of the platters, but for consistant usage and general tasks, even fairly randomized access, the 60% more data density really does the trick. I would rank the 100GB 7200rpm and the 120GB 5400rpm about dead even in overall performance. Randomized access of lots of small files is still a bit faster on the 100GB drive vs the 120GB, but that's not the typical scenario for most applications.

Interesting.
 
I ordered yesterday, 17" said 7-10 days, but my order page said estimated ship-date is Nov 7, so I'm hoping that's just a pessimistic estimate. And seeing how some people's machines seems to have shipped despite later estimates, I'm even more hopeful. :)
 
maverick808 said:
Thanks for the info. My ship date is estimated as the 31st to arrive by the 7th. I really hope that it ships earlier as I sold my MBP before Photokina and have been without a Mac laptop for over a month now.

Same dates here: hope for tomorrow...
 
camking said:
I'm jealous.... I went for a BTO 160gb. Should be here by 7 Nov.

Just out of interest when did you order and did it originally say 4 days to ship?

I thought all the normal 15" configarations were ready to ship in 4 days and the BTO ones 5 days.

I was kept busy yesterday, unable to place my order until late last night, and also did a BTO (glossy, 160GB HD, USB modem) with "3-5 day shipping" (it was "2-4 day" before doing any BTO changes) - mine will also ship 10/31, and arrive 11/7. I'm hoping that it ships earlier/quicker, as has happened with several Apple orders in the past!

Don't know how I'm going to wait 13 days .... but I've been scouring these forums since August, waiting for C2D, so it's already like a weight's been lifted from my shoulders, just being able to order and having the date set!!!

:D

iBorg
 
majorp said:
BTO 160gb

Ordered 6:30pm yesterday 24th via UK HE Website

estimated ship 31st oct, delivery 7th nov

MacBook Pro, 15-inch, 2.33GHz
Part Number: Z0DQ
2GB 667 DDR2 - 2x1GB SO-DIMMs 065-6619
SuperDrive 6x (DVD+R DL/DVD RW/CD-RW) 065-6625
MacBook Pro 15-inch Widescreen Display 065-6631
Backlit Keyboard (English) & Mac OS (English) 065-6627
Country kit 065-6628
160GB Serial ATA drive (5400rpm) 065-6624
2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 065-6642
Ready to ship: 5 days


Good for you, my order for MBPRO 17/2.33/2G/160/256VRAM/SD-DL-GBR, should ship on or before 07.11.2006.

& estimate that it will be delivered to your shipping address on or before 14.11.2006.
 
When I ordered from the UK HE store there was no mention of this 3 year warranty, I nearly payed £220 for apple care. Very glad to hear that this comes for free :)

I don't care if I don't have phone support too much..... I can always come on here if I have any questions:D

Wouldn't feel to bad if you don't get the same deal in the US.. we pay more here to start with so apple can probably afford to give us more discount/extras
 
802.11n not determined yet

True enough. But Intel is the 500 pound gorilla in this market chip wise. Intel and Apple are both on the steering group. There is an interim spec and process to qualify hardware to "hope" for future compatibility.

Heck, look how long the world has been stuck staying backward compatible with 80386!!

Sooo... whatever Intel and Mac come out with will at least be probably future compatible with OTHER brands of hardware, and at the minimum will be compatible with the wide range of hardware involved in the In-Ap nexus.

So buy with confidence. They need us to adopt their version of the pre-standard.


Someone asked why some chips are different speeds.

They are all made on the same dies. They are all assembled and tested. Some test as "capable" of higher clock speeds than others. Sort of a super QC standard group among the many. Those become the 3.0 Ghz chips. Then there is a layering of test results going down. On the low end you may get some 2.16Ghz chips that are actually quite able to run at 2.66 or 3 Ghz. Hence the fad of "overclocking". Many PC folks and even some Mac folks do that.

But Intel "certifies" a chip up to a certain speed. Above that slight defects in the mask result in local heating issues like a toaster element.

Rocketman
 
i really hope these ship times are just estimates and that they ship quick....i ordered mine around the same time everyone else that said their's shipped...hoping today i get a confirmation....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.