If a woman yelps with horror after some hairy guy in lipstick invades the ladies' bathroom is she to be charged with a hate crime by the thought police?
And what if some guy isn't even making much of an effort to even look female, such as the student that invaded the girls locker room at a college campus recently, can women have no right to say no without the gestapo hauling them before some kangaroo court?
Some of the most famous feminists in the world are now being no-platformed by snowflakes because they refuse to engage in this la la land nonsense where people can delusionally 'identify' as any thing they want. People get surgery to look like the cats they want to be. Can they book themselves into a cattery?
Most transexuals do not actually have 'gender dysphoria' where they believe they are literally trapped in the wrong body but merely 'want to be a woman/man', often as some sort of sexual fetish, hence many and up in sex work. There should be onus on the majority of the population to indulge every delusion the PC gestapo tell us is really, really important.
(Due to the large volume of posts in this thread I'll pick out this one post to respond to as representative of a particular misguided viewpoint)
You're quite ignorant on this issue. I'd suggest speaking with some actual trans people rather than forming your opinions off of some stereotype. Most trans people I know prefer to present as close to their identity as possible so no, not a lot of "hairy guys in lipstick." You've likely already had a trans-man (yes, I'm going to assume your gender, I'm not the kind of person who finds offense when people do) share a bathroom with you and haven't even been aware.
More importantly though, what is the fear of having trans people in a bathroom other than their birth certificate would dictate? From what I've seen of the debate it seems to break down into three areas:
1) non-trans individuals will abuse it
2) there could be sexual misconduct
3) think of the children
Number one I can sympathize with. Some jerk using the law as cover to do things that jerks do (harass people in various ways). Unfortunately there are plenty of examples of that across the legal landscape and I don't see it as a significant enough issue to warrant putting a halt to these efforts altogether. Someone misusing the situation in an abusive way (e.g. other than a woman using the men's room due to the line being too long in the woman's room) would inevitably be breaking some other law (e.g. disturbing the peace) and chargeable regardless.
Number two is just FUD. Gender identity and sexual preference aren't linked. I don't have stats but anecdotally most of the trans people I know are primarily attracted to the opposite gender of which they identify. So a trans-woman using the women's restroom likely has no sexual attraction to the women there. Further, we don't gate access to restrooms today based upon sexual preference, i.e. we already have gay men in men's rooms and lesbians in women's rooms and (thankfully mostly) don't have an objection to it.
And to number three, I can understand parents being uncomfortable explaining sexuality to children but we have stalls and you're just not very likely to have anything extra to explain. If you fear pedophilia then you should already be freaking out as pedophiles are not banned from using public restrooms today. If you somehow think that pedophilia exists at higher rates in the trans community than elsewhere then please cite your study.
Finally, as to your comment about trans people mostly just acting out a fetish, I assume that's due to your own anecdotal experience otherwise cite a study.