Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Popular vote means nothing. Bill Clinton never received a majority vote for President. The closest he got was 49.2% when he was re-elected. On his first election he won with 43% of the popular vote. So in both elections, the majority of voters wanted someone else. The system works as it should. You may not like the outcome, but don't pretend you've been slighted by it.
Wrong.

There are only five elections in US history where the winner lost the popular vote. Bill Clinton wasn't one of them. You can look these things up, you know.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uni...ons_in_which_the_winner_lost_the_popular_vote
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMRJIJ
At this point, the EC is taxation without representation.

Would you be calling for the EC to be abolished if Hillary won the EC vote and Trump won the popular vote? If you wouldn't have, then you're only up in arms about the EC now because your candidate didn't win the EC vote. If that's the case, get over it and set your sights on the 2018 and 2020 elections.

On this issue, I only take people seriously when they call for the EC to be abolished AND their candidate won the EC vote in the most recent election. To date, I have not met a single person who is calling for the EC to be abolished that voted for Trump.

Most (if not all) of the recent chatter about abolishing the EC is coming from people who voted for Hillary (or sat out the election but would've voted for Hillary if they did vote) who thought she had the election all wrapped up and they are still in complete shock and disbelief that she is not the President.
 
Last edited:
I believe in this .....

penisvagina.jpg
That won't work in NC. The law (as I understand it) there is that if you were born with a Penis but now have a Vagina you MUST by LAW go into the one marker PENIS.
That is just not right. My partner got hers removed almost 20 years ago. The last thing I want is for her to have to use a male restroom. She could use it and get assaulted (or worse) or not use it and after arrest get sent to a MALE facility.
What are her chances of getting out of there alive eh?
See, it is not simple. That is why we won't be visiting her kin in Nebraska for the forseeable future.
 
Popular vote means nothing. Bill Clinton never received a majority vote for President. The closest he got was 49.2% when he was re-elected. On his first election he won with 43% of the popular vote. So in both elections, the majority of voters wanted someone else. The system works as it should. You may not like the outcome, but don't pretend you've been slighted by it.
That's completely wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unobtainium
If a woman yelps with horror after some hairy guy in lipstick invades the ladies' bathroom is she to be charged with a hate crime by the thought police?

And what if some guy isn't even making much of an effort to even look female, such as the student that invaded the girls locker room at a college campus recently, can women have no right to say no without the gestapo hauling them before some kangaroo court?

Some of the most famous feminists in the world are now being no-platformed by snowflakes because they refuse to engage in this la la land nonsense where people can delusionally 'identify' as any thing they want. People get surgery to look like the cats they want to be. Can they book themselves into a cattery?

Most transexuals do not actually have 'gender dysphoria' where they believe they are literally trapped in the wrong body but merely 'want to be a woman/man', often as some sort of sexual fetish, hence many and up in sex work. There should be onus on the majority of the population to indulge every delusion the PC gestapo tell us is really, really important.

(Due to the large volume of posts in this thread I'll pick out this one post to respond to as representative of a particular misguided viewpoint)

You're quite ignorant on this issue. I'd suggest speaking with some actual trans people rather than forming your opinions off of some stereotype. Most trans people I know prefer to present as close to their identity as possible so no, not a lot of "hairy guys in lipstick." You've likely already had a trans-man (yes, I'm going to assume your gender, I'm not the kind of person who finds offense when people do) share a bathroom with you and haven't even been aware.

More importantly though, what is the fear of having trans people in a bathroom other than their birth certificate would dictate? From what I've seen of the debate it seems to break down into three areas:

1) non-trans individuals will abuse it
2) there could be sexual misconduct
3) think of the children

Number one I can sympathize with. Some jerk using the law as cover to do things that jerks do (harass people in various ways). Unfortunately there are plenty of examples of that across the legal landscape and I don't see it as a significant enough issue to warrant putting a halt to these efforts altogether. Someone misusing the situation in an abusive way (e.g. other than a woman using the men's room due to the line being too long in the woman's room) would inevitably be breaking some other law (e.g. disturbing the peace) and chargeable regardless.

Number two is just FUD. Gender identity and sexual preference aren't linked. I don't have stats but anecdotally most of the trans people I know are primarily attracted to the opposite gender of which they identify. So a trans-woman using the women's restroom likely has no sexual attraction to the women there. Further, we don't gate access to restrooms today based upon sexual preference, i.e. we already have gay men in men's rooms and lesbians in women's rooms and (thankfully mostly) don't have an objection to it.

And to number three, I can understand parents being uncomfortable explaining sexuality to children but we have stalls and you're just not very likely to have anything extra to explain. If you fear pedophilia then you should already be freaking out as pedophiles are not banned from using public restrooms today. If you somehow think that pedophilia exists at higher rates in the trans community than elsewhere then please cite your study.

Finally, as to your comment about trans people mostly just acting out a fetish, I assume that's due to your own anecdotal experience otherwise cite a study.
 
I would be for using just the popular vote moving forward, but he won fairly under the current system. It's not the first time a president lost the popular vote and got elected, it's happened with other presidents even before Gore.
You understand why the EC is important yes? If not for EC then a few heavily populated states would ALWAYS determine the elections. (California, NY, etc). No matter which side they represent they would always determine who is elected and the rest of the country would not have a say.

Clearly? No. He won in three states by a number so small they could all fit into the Rose Bowl stadium with room to spare.
Three states? Maybe you need to take another look at the election map. Pretty sure there were more than three states he won.
 
And don't give me the excuse that Hillary was no better... there was Bernie Sanders but it seems like Americans ignored him (he would have been great).

Ignore? Are you kidding? Did you see the lines wrapped around city blocks to attend his rallies? The stadiums overflowing with supporters while Hillary couldn't pack a high school gym? Democrats did this to themselves and we only have the Clinton lovers to blame. They were so focused on the first woman president, never mind her decades of moral and policy failures. The party elites lined up to reward the Clintons. After all, the Clintons had been stacking the deck for years so that Hillary could one day be corronated. As much as I loathe Trump, I'm glad the Clintons failed. They are horrible.

Fact check: Three million more individuals voted for Trump's opponent in the general election.

Meaningless. Trump won fair and square. Our system has never been based on popular vote.
 
Oh yeah - if you're someone that does not believe in gay marriage due to your religion go back to the stone age where you belong. How accepting of you.
I do not accept racists, I do not accept homophobes, I do not accept people trying to take rights away from other people. If your religion tells you to hate or beat up or kill or fire or imprision or fire or abandon a child then you need a new religion. You can't hide hatred under the banner of religion and wash your hands of the horrors committed under it.
 
All of the things going on in our country and your main concern is the refresh cycle of the Mac Pro?

In this moment they're being exactly the company I want them to be.
I agree. Apple is correct to comment on issues like this or any other for that matter. They're arguably the biggest and most influential company in the world not to mention an American one at that.
 
I would say it is likely just a medical condition.

Look up Gender Dysphoria (actual medical condition).

It's similar to having a Delusional Disorder (where people think things that are not objectively true - like believing they are a famous person, etc.).

As a society we are now so crazy that we cater to that craziness. No one dares challenge crazy behavior.

The question is, are we, as a society, really helping that person by catering to a disorder. My feeling is when reality becomes anything you want, that society is on the verge of collapse.
 
Should racial equality be left to the states to decide? If it is then my guess is every bigoted Republican southern state would have blacks thrown back into slavery. Human rights issues need to be protected at the Federal level, individual states have proven time and time again that they are incapable of protecting those most vulnarable to attack.

If anyone doesn't like Apple's involvement in human right's issues then you are most welcome to stop buying their products. You'll also have to stop partonizing every other American tech firm as they are all getting on board ( http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-transgender-apple-uber-microsoft-react-235295 ). In my opinion this would be a good thing - If you're a homophobic Republican then stop buying tech and go back to the stone age where you belong.
Actually I am a Democrat and skew liberal for civil rights. Nice try, but the reason I favor states rights is that I think the changes are more enduring and powerful coming from the people. As we are seeing now with Trump rolling back pretty much everything President Obama put into place, is that executive orders are a bandaid. Like bandaids they fall off after awhile.

Why are liberals and Democrats not seeing this? Why are we freaking out that Trump (who I most definitely did NOT vote for) is acting like King of the hill, but it was okay when President Obama (whom I DID vote for) regulated by executive order and NOT by respecting our time honored system of government. President Obama was doing some wonderful humanitarian things but I knew they were not going to last, except for the few things that the executive branch has always overseen that our legislative and judicial branches normally do not. They aren't meant to. That's not how our government works at its best.

We either believe in our system of government and let it take its course or we succumb to a top-down system prone to tyranny. Yes, it is slow, but when it comes of the people, by the people and for the people bit by painful bit, it will endure. I don't want to live in a country where any president can rule by a constant stream of decrees. Which is what Trump is trying to do most of the rest of the time.

It is refreshing that this time he's actually doing what a president is supposed to, and ceding the power back to the people and to our system. In due time it will become a legitimate federal matter and have the backing of the people to confer more enduring protections for the people as previous civil rights causes have done. It won't be just a presidential whim that can be undone by another president.
 
Would you be calling for the EC to be abolished if Hillary won the EC vote and Trump won the popular vote? If you wouldn't have, then you're only up in arms about the EC now because your candidate didn't win the EC vote. If that's the case, get over it and set your sights on the 2018 and 2020 elections.

On this issue, I only take people seriously when they call for the EC to be abolished AND their candidate won the EC vote in the most recent election. To date, I have not met a single person who is calling for the EC to be abolished that voted for Trump.

Most (if not all) of the recent chatter about abolishing the EC is coming from people who voted for Hillary (or sat out the election but would've voted for Hillary if they did vote) who thought she had the election all wrapped up and they are still in complete shock and disbelief that she is not the President.

WELL SAID
 
There's a lot wrong with your statement.

1. A man that feels like a woman in the bathroom is interested in using the bathroom; not your wife or little girl.
2. You're advocating that a woman that feels like a man be in the woman's room with your wife and little girl. That's right. Someone who is sexually attracted to women.
3. You make the assumption that said "main who feels like a woman" is a pedophile. If you saw a little girl in the bathroom, would you assault them? Of course not. So why would a transgender woman assault your little girl.



Except that's completely false. Not everything in nature is so black and white. A law won't change that.

And let's also forget. There hasn't been a single incident of transgender people assaulting children in bathrooms. In other words, this is a made-up problem.

Let's also not forget, there have been several incidents of transgender people being assaulted when forced to use the bathroom based on their sex and not their gender.

Let people pee in the bathroom they see fit. There hasn't been a problem before, so why are we making problems?
So if you are born with a penis you are not a man? What planet are you on?
 
Uh, no we didn't. Trump lost the popular vote. He won on the technicality of the Electoral College, not because most people wanted him.

Technicality? Do you know how presidential elections work? Trump won fair and square. Our system has never been based on popular vote. Hillary didn't focus on the right states.
 
As a society we are now so crazy that we cater to that craziness. No one dares challenge crazy behavior.

The question is, are we, as a society, really helping that person by catering to a disorder. My feeling is when reality becomes anything you want, that society is on the verge of collapse.

This is exactly it. Well stated
[doublepost=1487862696][/doublepost]
Technicality? Do you know how presidential elections work? Trump won fair and square. Our system has never been based on popular vote. Hillary didn't focus on the right states.

It's just amazing the ignorance by so called "intelligent" people in this country. I blame the media of course.
 
I do not accept racists, I do not accept homophobes, I do not accept people trying to take rights away from other people. If your religion tells you to hate or beat up or kill or fire or imprision or fire or abandon a child then you need a new religion. You can't hide hatred under the banner of religion and wash your hands of the horrors committed under it.
Thats fine - So then how do you feel about Islam?
 
  • Like
Reactions: old mac
Popular vote solves that. The current system is weighted to give people in some states more of a voice than others. One person, one vote ... it's simple.

Do you think a democrat gets a voice in Texas or a republican gets a voice in California ? With the EC, they don't.

We are a democratic republic - not a true democracy. The smaller states would have never joined the union if popular vote is how things would be decided. Places like Rhode Island and Connecticut would never out-vote what New York wanted. This is how the EC came to be, and why the smaller states agreed to join.

There is also the issue of states rights, which has changed over time. A state used to have the ability to have an established religion - this is why the federal govt. could not establish one - it would be trampling on states rights - that has now been turned on its head along with a bunch of other things. (not saying this to bring up a religion, just pointing out how things have changed).

I'm not saying the EC is perfect, but I know "majority rules" never goes down the road people think it will when you look at history. When 51% decides what 100% get to do, bad things happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iphone1027
Strange, seeing how the stock market has reached record numbers, as a result of Trump's win. Yea, yea, yea... You like your companies speaking out in favor of liberal crap. Still, economics has little to do with anyone who disagrees with that.

Yes, Trump rebuilt the stock market from epically low 2008 levels in just a matter of days. He's incredible at this Presidenting thing! Obama on the other hand crashed everything just a few days into his first term! :rolleyes:

I takes years of policies and turning the ship slowly to build a stock market to record highs or crash it to record lows. Big buisinesses love Trump right now because he's undoing all of the regulations that they so desperatey hate. Will they love him if he destroys the trade agreements that fuel their businesses? Let's give it a few years and see where we're at.
 
I would say it is likely just a medical condition.

Look up Gender Dysphoria (actual medical condition).

It's similar to having a Delusional Disorder (where people think things that are not objectively true - like believing they are a famous person, etc.).

As a society we are now so crazy that we cater to that craziness. No one dares challenge crazy behavior.

The question is, are we, as a society, really helping that person by catering to a disorder. My feeling is when reality becomes anything you want, that society is on the verge of collapse.

Thank you for getting it. How the HELL did we end up here as a society? men who feel they are women and vice-versa? HUH? What? How the fu.....? Whats next? How do we prove or know its not being faked to gain an advantage of some sort of to act out some sexual fantasy? We dont and cant. Just great.

I cannot believe the apologists in this thread defending this goofy crap. Its like REALLY?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.