Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here we go again. Stick to making consumer products. :eek::(:rolleyes::eek:
Yes that would be nice. Maybe actually deliver Mac updates!

In any event this whole thing is so stupid on the part of those that promote these bathroom policies. Any such policy is just ripe for exploitation by abusers for their own sexual gratification. The policies aren't there to be mean to transgender people, they are there to protect the bulk of the populace.

What is even more asinine is that this is so simple to deal with in a way that doesn't impact anybody negatively. All we need to do is to remove male/female designations from restrooms, make them unisex if you will. Many restaurant and other facilities are taking this approach as it completely side steps the issue. The only problem is volume as you have rooms for single person instead of a room with multiple water closets.

In a nut shell the transgender community is simply driving for the wrong solution to a problem.
[doublepost=1487896737][/doublepost]
Nope. The education of students...all students, is everyone's responsibility to speak up about. They are our future.

If Trump can comment on Apple products (which he did) then I see no reason why Apple cannot do the reverse.
Yes but taking a piss has little to do with education. The problem here is that the transgender community is looking for a solution that no one will rationally accept, instead of promoting solutions that are workable.
 
Sure. I just prefer the actual data points rather than the false narrative being told. :)
What is the false narrative?
Who doesn't know he lost the popular vote and won the election by how the election is actually determined?
 
At first i was against this, but when u look at it... Is this anything more different than a public available sign saying "boys" and "girls" toilets ? or disabled people have their own disabled section... That's still all gender based and we accept that. By definition then, we could discriminate because disabled people do not have the same facilities in place as non-disabled.
 
Apple is capable of both making consumer products* and issuing three-sentence anti-discrimination statements to a news outlet. :)

*Alright, so some of the Macs beg to differ, but that's another story...



Apple obviously perceives that is in their best interest to make their position known. Silence could be interpreted as tacit agreement. I think this is good for them for both recruiting a diverse workforce (what if a talented engineer who happened to be trans felt uncomfortable applying?) as well as ensuring socially-conscious buyers know what kind of organization their money is supporting.

I think most people's disagreement here can be boiled down to the fact that trans people freak them out and that they therefore don't want companies speaking up about it. (I had a couple friends from college who ended up being trans, and I think they were a great help for me in understanding these issues. I wish everyone could experience that, but everyone can at least read about it or have an open mind.) Much like gay rights, this shouldn't even be a political issue. Maybe Apple will stop speaking up about it when people's rights are no longer politicized, but I suspect you'll still be disappointed as, being a business, they probably have opinions on economic issues too, which probably going to also be considered political issues for the rest of time. :)


it isn't a political issue which is probably why the Trump administration pulled out of the process. it is an issue of building design. This whole problem would go away if the country just moved to unisex restrooms as a basic design requirement in public buildings. Things like this become an issue when politicians get involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PizzaBoxStyle
"Some people have said that I shouldn’t get involved politically because probably half our customers are Republicans – maybe a little less, maybe more Dell than ours. But I do point out that there are more Democrats than Mac users so I’m going to just stay away from all that political stuff because that was just a personal thing" - Steve Jobs http://macdailynews.com/2004/08/25/...o_just_stay_away_from_all_that_political_stu/
 
Do you believe this? Trump averaging 20,000 people at rallies in Blue and Red states to Hillary's 300? lol.

Can you cite a source for these numbers, or are you just making them up?

Also... relevance?
I've never been to a political rally in my life, but I've voted in every election since I turned 18, though. Rallies have no relation to who is actually voting for whom. Heck, I bet people go to rallies for their opponents, either out of curiosity, or to heckle people.

The vote counts are official tallies and until these allegations of voter fraud are actually investigated and proven then the tallies are the official results of the election. That means that more people wanting Hilliary for President is a fact (just thought I'd point that out, I know how you Trupettes have trouble with that term). The idea Trump got more votes is an "alternative fact", i.e. it's not true.
 
Fact check: Three million more individuals voted for Trump's opponent in the general election.

The overwhelming majority of them where illegal aliens so what is your point. Don't believe me look at the states and areas that actually support Clinton. The problem with illegal voting is becoming a national crisis that needs to be addressed soon. It would be fairly easy to round up 10 million illegal aliens in this country so once they are gone you won't have three states to pull all those votes from.

The reality is Clinton loss big time and the democrats as a party even bigger. in fact they got pummeled like they haven't in years. Why? Because after 8 years of Obama they demonstrated clearly that they didn't deserve offices in this country. Even the Democrats that won where right leaning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jblagden
The overwhelming majority of them where illegal aliens so what is your point. Don't believe me look at the states and areas that actually support Clinton. The problem with illegal voting is becoming a national crisis that needs to be addressed soon. It would be fairly easy to round up 10 million illegal aliens in this country so once they are gone you won't have three states to pull all those votes from.

The reality is Clinton loss big time and the democrats as a party even bigger. in fact they got pummeled like they haven't in years. Why? Because after 8 years of Obama they demonstrated clearly that they didn't deserve offices in this country. Even the Democrats that won where right leaning.

Is that you Alex Jones?

Holy cow! You are implicating thousands of Republican monitors in precincts around the country as being in on an undocumented illegals voter scheme. Way, way, way, way, out there. Not enough way out there for your post.
 
The overwhelming majority of them where illegal aliens so what is your point. Don't believe me look at the states and areas that actually support Clinton. The problem with illegal voting is becoming a national crisis that needs to be addressed soon. It would be fairly easy to round up 10 million illegal aliens in this country so once they are gone you won't have three states to pull all those votes from.

The reality is Clinton loss big time and the democrats as a party even bigger. in fact they got pummeled like they haven't in years. Why? Because after 8 years of Obama they demonstrated clearly that they didn't deserve offices in this country. Even the Democrats that won where right leaning.

that must be some really good ****, share
 
Wow. Just wow. You're a great poster child for so-called liberal "tolerance", aren't you? I thought you were supposed to "go high" when others go low? I won't wish the same on you that you wished on me, sir/madam.

As an aside, I'd like to know exactly what I said that was factually incorrect? The U.S. Constitution says absolutely nothing about transgender bathroom rights, which is exactly what I said. If you find anything about that subject in the Constitution, please post it here for us all to see.

Liberal? lol. I'm more moderate conservative. You're just on the wrong side of history like most of the alt right and give real conservatives a bad name. I'll never tolerate hate and bigotry that you cling to. I will always call you out.
 
Could we build a manufacturing base or workforce? We make Dreamliners, we can make iPhones.

Be honest, it's all about COST. Chinese sweatshop workers are cheap. People in China are qualified to be VPs work cheaper, speak the language, and can run operations there. Instead, we fly bigshots from the US.
It's all about "Protect MY job, screw the peons".

If you don't believe that you're pretty naive.

Build a workforce? No, it isn't that simple. Start living in the real world.
 
1. You're right: no one should have to worry about it, but they do because idiots like those in NC and TX have decided to be the legal arbiters of people's personal gender identity. You seem not to have heard, but defining gender is no longer plain and simple, unless you're a right-wing nut job or a religious reactionary who ignores the establishment clause of the Constitutuon.
2. So, it's okay to pass discriminatory legislation as long as it's not against the majority? Beautiful position. By the way, if you're male you're in the United States minority, so I presume you won't mind if they pass a law keeping you out of restaurants and in the back of the bus.

Why do people like you try to make simple things complex?? Boys are boys, girls are girls. Gender IS plain and simple. It's not a debate, it's a fact. If someone "identifies" as a different gender than the one he/she actually is, then that person has the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jblagden
Give me a break buddy. She "mistook" saying it 3 times in different forums/shows. She should resign if she's that incompetent.

And Trump doesn't WTF he's talking about; he was quoting a right wing doc on Fox.
There are some issues, but none at the level he's talking about nor you.

The dailycaller is an extreme right wing source, so cut the crap.
You are basically a dishonest fabricator, just like your idol.

Wow, I didn't realize the UK DailyMail was also an extreme right wing source. And that USA Today is run by the Tea Party. And The Guardian is owned by the John Birch Society. And the Express in the UK is owned by Liberty University.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...le-police-days-violence-immigrant-ghetto.html
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/05/25/sweden-riots-violence/2360211/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...en-ghettoes-gangs-varvadersligan-klas-friberg
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...nce-erupts-no-go-zone-PM-denies-Sweden-crisis

It seems there are a lot of main stream news sources outside of the US reporting about the violence in Sweden but if CNN doesn't run the story then the rest of the world must just be making everything up like I do. By the way, if Kellyanne should resign for saying Bowling Green 3 times, what should Obama have done after telling us 36 times "if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan"? Politifact (another extreme right wing source LOL) called it the "lie of the year."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ar-if-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it/
 
  • Like
Reactions: iphone1027
Here we go again. Stick to making consumer products. :eek::(:rolleyes::eek:

they have as much right as anyone to speak out about this. if you know anything of the history of this company, you'd understand that as well.

sorry, who is "allowed" to speak out about this according to you?
[doublepost=1487902086][/doublepost]
Why do people like you try to make simple things complex?? Boys are boys, girls are girls. Gender IS plain and simple. It's not a debate, it's a fact. If someone "identifies" as a different gender than the one he/she actually is, then that person has the problem.

keep in mind, your experiences and views are not the world's experiences and views.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ravishly/neuroscience-proves-what-_b_6494820.html
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/how-science-helps-us-understand-gender-identity/
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/gender-lines-science-transgender-identity/
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life...ology-behind-gender-identity/article25553156/

it might be "weird" to you or whatever, and personally i don't really understand it entirely myself either, but i understand that i cannot begin to speak of authority on something in have no experience in. you're making some assumptions that i think aren't reasonable. there are studies about this sort of thing, and the science appears to be there. I think you just don't really understand the complexity and nuance of the situation.. which is expected, because your statement looks like you're probably about 12 years old or so, so maybe i don't really expect you to understand that complexity.

also, you're mistaking "sex" and "gender".
[doublepost=1487902194][/doublepost]
Now the constitution is a "technicality?"
well, according to your president it's just an inconvenience.
 
That's always the liberal go to...."you got that info from a right wing source!" Unfortunately that accounts for about 3% of the media, the rest of the 97% has a liberal agenda and unfortunately for ALL of us, we don't have any actual legitimate non biased neutral news sources to actually get facts from about pretty much anything. It's throwing stories against the wall and retract in small writing the stuff that doesn't stick.

And by the way, were there not riots in Sweden in immigrant neighborhoods just 2 days after Trump mentioned that article? I believe a simple search on Google will give you all news sources reporting that information, yet not bring light of any of it to the mention by Trump 2 days earlier that there are issues in Sweden.
But liberals are going to claim the riots in Sweden 2 days after Trump's comments were because of what Trump said. Forget about all the stories you can find from 2013 - 2016 about the growing problems in Sweden, they were actually living in complete harmony until President Trump mentioned them. I know that is true, I heard it from the Ministry of Truth in Atlanta ;)
 
well, according to your president it's just an inconvenience.[/QUOTE]
Obama isn't in office any longer. We have one president at a time. All Americans have the same president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DoctorTech
...keep in mind, your experiences and views are not the world's experiences and views...

...you're probably about 12 years old or so, so maybe i don't really expect you to understand that complexity....

...also, you're mistaking "sex" and "gender".

1. "Experience" has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion whatsoever. If you have male parts, you're a male. If you have female parts, you're a female. (And if you have some of both, you have a birth defect, but that's a different issue entirely). This is the science. These are the facts. Come on, this is basic human anatomy. Everybody should know this.
2. I am a full-fledged adult, thank you very much. In fact, by judging your typing here, I suspect I am older than you.
3. "Sex" and "gender" are literally synonymous. Why do people these days keep saying they're different? After all the years I have lived on this earth, 2016 was the first year I had ever heard anybody attempt to say sex and gender are different things... What is wrong with you people??? Stop making up crap.
 
1. "Experience" has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion whatsoever. If you have male parts, you're a male. If you have female parts, you're a female. (And if you have some of both, you have a birth defect, but that's a different issue entirely). This is the science. These are the facts. Come on, this is basic human anatomy. Everybody should know this.
2. I am a full-fledged adult, thank you very much. In fact, by judging your typing here, I suspect I am older than you.
3. "Sex" and "gender" are literally synonymous. Why do people these days keep saying they're different? After all the years I have lived on this earth, 2016 was the first year I had ever heard anybody attempt to say sex and gender are different things... What is wrong with you people??? Stop making up crap.

who **** on your early bird special?
 
Really? :rolleyes:

You don't think a child worrying about where they can pee and if they are going to be harassed and discriminated over it affects their education? Seriously?

Man...you sound like you've never been in a school in your life.
If the child is pretending to be a different gender, I sure they have a lot bigger things to worry about than where to pee.
Oh, and I was the token fat kid science nerd in grade school, so I'm well aware of the joys of public school for the kid that stands out, thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
Why do people like you try to make simple things complex?? Boys are boys, girls are girls. Gender IS plain and simple. It's not a debate, it's a fact. If someone "identifies" as a different gender than the one he/she actually is, then that person has the problem.
Well, it is a debate. This very thread, among hundreds of other venues, is debating it. QED. Genetic gender may be simple, but gender identity turns out to be complicated. I know great people who you'd swear were one gender but were born another. These are now people who finally feel at home with the gender they look like.

And the reason you hear it from "tons of different people" (your words) is that tons of different people disagree with you. This includes the medical community and a majority of Americans. You may want this to be simple, but no amount of insisting that it is will make it so. Just as with womens suffrage, civil rights, and gay equality, the world has moved past you. Sorry that it makes you so uncomfortable.
 
Last edited:
"The black rights you reference have been fought for state by state, over GENERATIONS, to gain the backing and critical mass they needed to become secured in a permanent and enduring basis in our laws up to the federal level. And they are still being firmed up, with much progress left to accomplish. Same as with the rights of the disabled."

Excuse me - but why should I have to fight for my rights? Why should I have to suffer under the scorn of a privileged class? Why should I have to open my ***** wallet and hire an army of lawyers every time I want the same basic rights as everyone else? If you think that this is how it should be then you are grossly mistaken. This is not how it should be, this is not what our forefathers wanted. The constitution gives us rights - it's the individual southern states that try to take them away - I'm SO over it. So if an executive order can ease the suffering of a group of people who have been treated in a most horrific manner then so be it - i'll accept it.
Ethically and ideally you should not have to. Realistically you will or someone else will. Because we are seeing the ugly reality that the executive orders and presidential guidelines aren't permanent. They can be rolled back. Obliterated.

And in this specific case about bathrooms in schools, Trump may not be wrong. Or right...or it is all simply moot and buys only a temporary remedy. It's a Title IX issue that was due to be further adjudicated anyway.

You mistake me. I don't think you should live under any kind of scorn. But what we rightfully should have to do is different from the harsh reality of what we actually have to do to effect change. Lasting change.

I think you need to use the time tested tools that you are scorning to get the enduring results you seek. Nothing is handed to anyone. Not any basic right. Not anything. We have fought wars and sacrificed lives to secure our rights and freedoms and to protect them time and time again.

Now we face other kinds of fights to protect our rights against more Orwellian kinds of threats, but that's the subject of an entirely different discussion. We have the ideal that we are endowed with inalienable rights but the fact is that entropy is always at work in human society as it is in science. Rights don't uphold themselves. We are always fighting. Always vigilant. Or at least we should be.

I've scrapped all my life to live as free as I can from the effects of prejudice. I don't think it's good or right that I've had to, but I am pragmatic and understand the reality into which I was born and so have always been willing to fight. And while it is wearying it is also empowering and educational. I would not trade my struggles for anyone's ease, for that reason.

My generation sadly did not do enough for LGBT rights to help the current generation. But many made a damned good start (thank you Ruth Bader Ginsburg) and it's up to everyone now to finish the job, properly, in a way that will endure.

The court cases and the calls to your legislators and the grassroots fight to be heard will result in laws and court precedents that can't be overturned at the whim of one president or one branch of the government. There are already very powerful legal precedents that will establish the most basic of gay civil rights. (Again thank you RBG--a remarkable woman worth studying). The ones that protect all of us from workplace discrimination and housing discrimination. We need to build on that foundation and secure marriage rights, and other civil rights.

The so-called bathroom laws aren't worked out yet. The fight for LGBT rights is in its early stages compared to other categories of civil rights. I get that you don't want to live under the injustice of it all. Neither did/do the blacks. Neither did/do the women. Neither did my parents. Neither do the Muslims now.

Now...again for the bathroom accommodations...the Title IX battle was/is never going to be enough anyway. It still leaves out the transgendered folks not in schools.

Part of the battle for transgendered people specifically seems to be that the states are all over the place regarding how or if they let people change the necessary legal documents to establish gender. Another part of the battle is we don't seem to legally recognize people who are both genders (or neither) and make room for them in our society. That needs to change and it's a change that will have to be fought for on many fronts on all levels of government. We need to look at historical precedent on how analogous rights were established in other civil rights battles and replicate the approach for the best chance at success. That's logical and reasonable, though not as emotionally appealing as having a President sign an order or a guideline...that can be rolled back by another president.

Now I will say one thing that is technically irrelevant, but I feel needs to be said, because along the way in this thread I've seen the concept of religion get slated a bit. I understand why. I have seen other people interpret the same Bible I read to emphasize guiding principles that are very different from mine. So I will speak up for some religious people who are actually compelled by their religious faith to support LGBT rights. My interpretation of the command of Jesus Christ to love one another as I love myself means I don't stand by and let anyone get marginalized, threatened, harassed and denied their civil rights. Even if they do or believe in something that contradicts something else I believe as a Christian. So I don't even sit here worrying about whether or not homosexuality and transgendering is a sin or not. That's not for me to decide, in my interpretation of my own faith. I'm to use the power of my vote and my freedom of speech to support the change that will end all the horrible things that drive members of the LGBT community to elevated rates of suicide and all the other suffering they have to endure. It is, in my interpretation, a sin to contribute to the suffering of my fellow humans by apathy or indifference. Which is why I have gone against other Christians and taken tremendous criticism and censure to support gay marriage in my state and support initiatives to make it a lasting right nationally. At the same time, I do my best to stand up when I feel fellow Christians are being marginalized, hurt, disrespected just for being Christian. Or Jews for being Jewish. Or Muslims for being Muslims. Atheists for being Atheists, and so forth.

Again, going back to the original article, I don't object to Tim Cook using the power of his voice and vote as a person to effect change, either. Rightly or wrongly, I see problems and unavoidable hypocrisy conflating Apple as a corporate entity into the mix when they can't or won't do anything to take a stand for human rights in the other countries in which they do business. I know that's a distinction that can be confusing to some. I have tried my best to explain it in previous posts and I know it's certainly open to debate. I will think it over and see if even I continue to hold that opinion as time goes on and I gain more perspectives.

By the way, thank you for engaging me in this discussion and reading my posts. I apologize that they are so long.
 
Wrong.

There are only five elections in US history where the winner lost the popular vote. Bill Clinton wasn't one of them. You can look these things up, you know.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uni...ons_in_which_the_winner_lost_the_popular_vote

As clearly pointed out, Clinton never had the majority of people vote for him. He never exceeded 50%. That is fact. I suggest you get accustomed to the electoral process. It's not going anywhere.
[doublepost=1487903761][/doublepost]
Popular vote solves that. The current system is weighted to give people in some states more of a voice than others. One person, one vote ... it's simple.

Do you think a democrat gets a voice in Texas or a republican gets a voice in California ? With the EC, they don't.

Popular vote does no such thing. You could have 10 people running and one person gets 25% of the vote and the rest less. You really want to elect a President who gets 25% of the vote? He/She represents the entire country, not a bunch of city dwelling liberals.

BTW, where the heck did you go to school that you have such a limited understanding of how our electoral process works? Your teachers need to be fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck and iphone1027
But he won those States... So... does it matter how much he won, when his opponent is expected to win easily, and started packing to move to White House.
No one is disputing that....for oh like the 100th time. What I am disputing is the stupid notion that American gave him some sort of mandate and that America (as in most or all of us) wanted him. No, we did not. A 77,000 people difference out of a country of over 300 million is a very small number.
 
Never said the election results are wrong. Trump won! BAM case closed. But if you want some proof that some states had more votes come in than were living there or registered look up Detroit. Look up Michigan. There are two you can read up on.
So you're saying there was voter fraud in Michigan? Trump didn't win Michigan? :)

Sorry if that's what you are saying you'll need some proof. That state is run by a Republican governor. I don't hear him making the claim you are. Now why would that be?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.