I'm surprised. I had no idea anyone sought out Dell computers.
It's mostly just IT dept's either leasing them or buying them with service contracts. The actual hardware is probably not even the most important thing in their purchasing decisions.
I'm surprised. I had no idea anyone sought out Dell computers.
next time you want to respond to one of mine posts please read my entire post, not just the first sentence. Had you done so this time you would have learned that I didn't diss Dell, but said all Win boxes are commodities & consumers buy what is most affordable or has the features they need.
You responded only to repeat what I already wrote.![]()
Ugh, disappointing.
I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.
is light-years in distance from Dell, IMO, in quality and OS in computers offered. The thing is, DELL makes decent computers, with lowest price.......
So many Apple haters, i got to ask why do you even use an mac forum![]()
Why would you want to take Mac Pro on a plane? Desktops aren't meant for portability, they are meant to used at a single place. You'll be better off with a Macbook Pro if you want portability.
Regardless, this is no excuse for a desktop computer to make it hard if not possible at all to upgrade CPU/GPU (and maybe storage). 256GB storage for a pro machine, really?! And I don't understand the point of keeping everything external, it creates so much clutter.
Dell has such low prices, I'm amazed at how $cheap they have their base notebooks these days. I guess that price point is huge for the general public. Although, PC's just don't last, in particular from a software standpoint(Windows)...that bloated OS.
is light-years in distance from Dell, IMO, in quality and OS in computers offered. The thing is, DELL makes decent computers, with lowest price.......
![]()
The Mac Mini is a desktop computer.
The iMac is a desktop computer - despite what you say, I don't put it on the floor, I don't put it on my lap, I don't hold it at its "stick", I put it on a desk. So it's a desktop computer.
And you can turn any MacBook into a desktop computer. Would be a shame with a Retina MBP, but close the lid, attach a keyboard and monitor, and you have a desktop computer. My current desktop computer at home is a 2006 white MacBook Pro with a broken graphics card.(Actually, MBPs with broken screens but otherwise working sell quite well on eBay exactly for that reason).
Try taking the current/old Mac pro on a plane.
Ugh, disappointing.
I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.
Why would you want to take Mac Pro on a plane? Desktops aren't meant for portability, they are meant to used at a single place. You'll be better off with a Macbook Pro if you want portability.
Regardless, this is no excuse for a desktop computer to make it hard if not possible at all to upgrade CPU/GPU (and maybe storage). 256GB storage for a pro machine, really?! And I don't understand the point of keeping everything external, it creates so much clutter.
If you like the idea of a non-upgradable pro machine (relative to the outgoing model) and trashcan design with clutter, this Mac Pro will certainly appeal to you.
Can't innovate anymore, my ass![]()
Instead of looking at unit sales, look at revenue. And suddenly, Apple is up there.
Instead of looking at revenue, look at profit. And suddenly, Apple is the absolute leader, with last estimates 45% of all profits going to Apple (more than 3 times more than Dell, and that was before Dell's profits dropped).
Ugh, disappointing.
I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.
This doesn't translate remotely into sales.
See http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/10/10/pc-market-consolidating-around-top-3-vendors/ for example. An estimate of 4.4 million Macs compared to around 14 million from Lenevo, 14 million from HP and 9.5 million from HP.
Who? Try more people wanting dells than Macs. Secondly, look at dell sales vs. Mac. Everyone wants a Porsche but they buy Volkswagon.
Why would you want to take Mac Pro on a plane? Desktops aren't meant for portability, they are meant to used at a single place. You'll be better off with a Macbook Pro if you want portability.
Regardless, this is no excuse for a desktop computer to make it hard if not possible at all to upgrade CPU/GPU (and maybe storage). 256GB storage for a pro machine, really?! And I don't understand the point of keeping everything external, it creates so much clutter.
Image
If you like the idea of a non-upgradable pro machine (relative to the outgoing model) and trashcan design with clutter, this Mac Pro will certainly appeal to you.
Can't innovate anymore, my ass![]()
Apple chose the my way or the high way route because the other way round, they were going bankrupt. Too many choices in their line up was a big problem. Steve came and axed everything. And they are going to continue that route for the foreseeable future.
I myself have disagreed with their choices many times, including the new Mac Pro. I don't like dual GPU's standard. If it was up to me, I'd remove one GPU and make the chassis even smaller and offer different types of GPU's, not just Fire Pro's.
are you seriously making a fuzz about whether the word consumer defines all those that buy mac pros? that list consists of business, freelancers and rich tweeters and everything in between.
i dont know what it is about modern respect for the individual or companies that my way or the highway is actually considered a choice. its the famous henry ford line magnified in contempt and arrogance
serious off topic question here have you ever once not agreed (or forced yourself to agree) with what apple does, says or releases?
Ah, that moronic argument once again. If that's the way you plan to set-up the new Mac Pro, methinks it's not for you. I can't wait!
... No one in the actual pro market uses internal storage. No one wants to use proprietary PCI interfaces to connect to external capture devices (And no, no one in the pro market wants an internal capture device).
I guess the old Mac Pro made a nice high end hacker desktop (in the more traditional sense of the word), but that was never the target market.
Ugh, disappointing. I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.
is light-years in distance from Dell, IMO, in quality and OS in computers offered. The thing is, DELL makes decent computers, with lowest price.......
Is it just me, or people around here stopped thinking?
What sort of an argument is that? It's like saying, "Try parking an SUV on a bike parking rack", implying that because SUV's can't be parked on such small spaces, they're therefore worthless.
LOL, you actually took a Mac Pro on flights?! My god... just get a decent laptop.. . All the MacBook Pros with a Sandybridge processor or better are more than capable.
apple is doing everything right it seems.
even friends of mine did buy imacs lately, even though they dont do anything else than browsing the web with it.
waste of money if you ask me, but if it makes them happy....it sure makes apple happy
While I can be frustrated that Apple did away with an excellent, high-powered, workstation by "trash canning" the previous G5/Mac Pro chassis, I can't disagree with your assessment. Nevertheless, there are a lot "pros" using the current Pro, with internal storage, for things other than video capture and editing, and who have no need for 12-cores etc.
I consoled myself by purchasing more Apple stock with the money I would have spent on a new Mac Pro, and I'm spec'ing out a reasonably nice hackintosh system. Here's hoping the new Mac Pro is wildly successful. (go go AAPL stock price!)
Everyone wants a Porsche
but they buy Volkswagon.