Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
next time you want to respond to one of mine posts please read my entire post, not just the first sentence. Had you done so this time you would have learned that I didn't diss Dell, but said all Win boxes are commodities & consumers buy what is most affordable or has the features they need.

You responded only to repeat what I already wrote. :confused:

I read your whole post. You asked why someone would consider a Dell specifically vs. HP or otherwise. And I responded that I would consider a Dell because I think they still have a good reputation and they are affordable.

In other words, they are still a recognizable brand and I'd expect consumers to seek them out specifically because of it (more so than HP, for example - from my experience, HP is not as much of a "household name" as Dell is).
 
Ugh, disappointing.

I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.

If Apple doesn't make the computer you want, then go buy something else. When someone hopes for the failure of something, it says a whole lot more about the someone than the something.

is light-years in distance from Dell, IMO, in quality and OS in computers offered. The thing is, DELL makes decent computers, with lowest price.......

Dell is good for some people in that they offer lots of choice, but they offer too much choice, in my opinion. I once priced out a Dell. It gave me three choices for wireless card. All 802.11n, and all three within $5 in price. Seriously, just put the best one in! And how is the average buyer going to decide which one? Why should they when they're so close in price.

So many Apple haters, i got to ask why do you even use an mac forum :D

People crave attention. When they're children, it's important to give them attention for doing good things, and not bad things. Then they learn that doing good things is rewarding, and doing bad things does nothing for anyone. These people have not learned this yet, and we continue to give them bad attention (feeding the trolls, as it were). If we just ignore or block them, they'll either go away and seek attention somewhere else, or start having constructive arguments. Though I suspect the former will happen over the latter.

Why would you want to take Mac Pro on a plane? Desktops aren't meant for portability, they are meant to used at a single place. You'll be better off with a Macbook Pro if you want portability.

Regardless, this is no excuse for a desktop computer to make it hard if not possible at all to upgrade CPU/GPU (and maybe storage). 256GB storage for a pro machine, really?! And I don't understand the point of keeping everything external, it creates so much clutter.

I don't know - if I'm a film maker going on location, I may want a powerful machine to produce dailies very quickly. If I'm a field scientist, and I have to process data at a remote location? There are lots of reasons. People used to carry Mac Pluses and SEs around. There were cases designed for them.

Regardless, thinking this creates so much clutter just shows your lack of creativity. Get a long thunderbolt cable and put all your stuff in a rack in a closet. What do you need on your desk?
 
Dell has such low prices, I'm amazed at how $cheap they have their base notebooks these days. I guess that price point is huge for the general public. Although, PC's just don't last, in particular from a software standpoint(Windows)...that bloated OS.

I know what you mean. There are still about 400,000,000 million computers including a good chunk of the business world running on XP, that's what, about 12 years old or so?
 
is light-years in distance from Dell, IMO, in quality and OS in computers offered. The thing is, DELL makes decent computers, with lowest price.......


:):apple:

Dell makes computers for people whose only concern is price. This, of course, excepts Enterprise users who are concerned with 24/7 support, and Dell basically subsidizes their hardware offerings with enterprise support.
 
The Mac Mini is a desktop computer.

The iMac is a desktop computer - despite what you say, I don't put it on the floor, I don't put it on my lap, I don't hold it at its "stick", I put it on a desk. So it's a desktop computer.

And you can turn any MacBook into a desktop computer. Would be a shame with a Retina MBP, but close the lid, attach a keyboard and monitor, and you have a desktop computer. My current desktop computer at home is a 2006 white MacBook Pro with a broken graphics card. :D (Actually, MBPs with broken screens but otherwise working sell quite well on eBay exactly for that reason).

Ah yes, I forget about the Mac mini with no discrete gpu :(

I'm not trying to bash, I really want apple to make a consumer desktop computer. I guess it would cannibalize other higher profit margin products. The ability to upgrade GPUs later on would bring me to Mac. Usually the first part to go obsolete and the first to fry, at least in my experience.

Both my laptop and desktop have upgradable GPUs fwiw. I keep my pcs longer than most.
 
Last edited:
Try taking the current/old Mac pro on a plane.

Is it just me, or people around here stopped thinking?

What sort of an argument is that? It's like saying, "Try parking an SUV on a bike parking rack", implying that because SUV's can't be parked on such small spaces, they're therefore worthless.
 
Ugh, disappointing.

I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.

But its perfect for their target market, consumers who want to feel like they use professional grade equipment.
 
Why would you want to take Mac Pro on a plane? Desktops aren't meant for portability, they are meant to used at a single place. You'll be better off with a Macbook Pro if you want portability.

Regardless, this is no excuse for a desktop computer to make it hard if not possible at all to upgrade CPU/GPU (and maybe storage). 256GB storage for a pro machine, really?! And I don't understand the point of keeping everything external, it creates so much clutter.

If you like the idea of a non-upgradable pro machine (relative to the outgoing model) and trashcan design with clutter, this Mac Pro will certainly appeal to you.

Can't innovate anymore, my ass;):rolleyes:

This clutter argument is laughable and that picture is even more laughable.
The same argument was made when the MacAir came out.
Never came to fruition.
 
Instead of looking at unit sales, look at revenue. And suddenly, Apple is up there.
Instead of looking at revenue, look at profit. And suddenly, Apple is the absolute leader, with last estimates 45% of all profits going to Apple (more than 3 times more than Dell, and that was before Dell's profits dropped).

Because of the iPhone sales, this a computer to computer comparison.
 
Ugh, disappointing.

I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.

Please, the price difference between the new Mac Pro and actually building an equivalent machine yourself is the lowest I've ever seen. Also, Apple's competitors can't beat that price. So please tell me how the idea that it is overpriced got into your head.

----------

This doesn't translate remotely into sales.

See http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/10/10/pc-market-consolidating-around-top-3-vendors/ for example. An estimate of 4.4 million Macs compared to around 14 million from Lenevo, 14 million from HP and 9.5 million from HP.

Yes, those three companies happen to make products in all of the different price ranges....not shocking.

----------

Who? Try more people wanting dells than Macs. Secondly, look at dell sales vs. Mac. Everyone wants a Porsche but they buy Volkswagon.

Volkswagon are good cars. Dells are more Hyundai.

----------

Why would you want to take Mac Pro on a plane? Desktops aren't meant for portability, they are meant to used at a single place. You'll be better off with a Macbook Pro if you want portability.

Regardless, this is no excuse for a desktop computer to make it hard if not possible at all to upgrade CPU/GPU (and maybe storage). 256GB storage for a pro machine, really?! And I don't understand the point of keeping everything external, it creates so much clutter.


Image


If you like the idea of a non-upgradable pro machine (relative to the outgoing model) and trashcan design with clutter, this Mac Pro will certainly appeal to you.

Can't innovate anymore, my ass;):rolleyes:

You do realize that people who use these machines also use a NAS/SAN, right? It'll likely never end up like the picture. Also, your statement about what a desktop is supposed to be is about as typical "PC" as it gets...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apple chose the my way or the high way route because the other way round, they were going bankrupt. Too many choices in their line up was a big problem. Steve came and axed everything. And they are going to continue that route for the foreseeable future.

I myself have disagreed with their choices many times, including the new Mac Pro. I don't like dual GPU's standard. If it was up to me, I'd remove one GPU and make the chassis even smaller and offer different types of GPU's, not just Fire Pro's.

true. i just will never call that a real choice.

the downside to that is they can be left flat footed such as with the interest/demand for larger iphone screen etc.

its a careful balance of thinking you always know what is best and imposing limitations as opposed to being in touch
 
are you seriously making a fuzz about whether the word consumer defines all those that buy mac pros? that list consists of business, freelancers and rich tweeters and everything in between.

i dont know what it is about modern respect for the individual or companies that my way or the highway is actually considered a choice. its the famous henry ford line magnified in contempt and arrogance

serious off topic question here have you ever once not agreed (or forced yourself to agree) with what apple does, says or releases?

You know, troll comments that are off the wall all over these forums kind of push anyone with any sense of reason to never disagree with Apple. Create a thread where everyone is overpraising an Apple product (I've never seen it happen) and you'll find that many who usually side with Apple will end up on the other side - because they are being REASONABLE.
 
Ah, that moronic argument once again. If that's the way you plan to set-up the new Mac Pro, methinks it's not for you. I can't wait!

The Mac Pro, true to its name, is a pro machine, and pro machines are supposed to be flexible to fit multiple use cases. It's got the horsepower, sure. But the difficulty of expansion makes it less appealing to the pro market than the old Pro was.

If it's not for him, then who is it for?
 
... No one in the actual pro market uses internal storage. No one wants to use proprietary PCI interfaces to connect to external capture devices (And no, no one in the pro market wants an internal capture device).

I guess the old Mac Pro made a nice high end hacker desktop (in the more traditional sense of the word), but that was never the target market.

While I can be frustrated that Apple did away with an excellent, high-powered, workstation by "trash canning" the previous G5/Mac Pro chassis, I can't disagree with your assessment. Nevertheless, there are a lot "pros" using the current Pro, with internal storage, for things other than video capture and editing, and who have no need for 12-cores etc.

I consoled myself by purchasing more Apple stock with the money I would have spent on a new Mac Pro, and I'm spec'ing out a reasonably nice hackintosh system. Here's hoping the new Mac Pro is wildly successful. (go go AAPL stock price!)
 
Ugh, disappointing. I hope the new Mac Pro flops for being a limited and completely disposable design that's way over priced.

Check out the price of the individual components going into it, before making that judgement.

Also many on this site have been saying for years, they'd be willing to pay somewhat more for american-built products. The nMacPro's price is not out of line with any other Apple product, especially figuring in US labor costs.
 
is light-years in distance from Dell, IMO, in quality and OS in computers offered. The thing is, DELL makes decent computers, with lowest price.......

Apple US Tech Support = Apple Retail Store and actual American citizens employed by Apple, speaking English, in service center located in the USA (for Apple's American customers)

DELL Tech Support = Some Pakistani guy named "Bob Johnson", with a thick Pakistani accent, pretending to be from Montana. Half-intelligible English. But your tech support experience is still a nightmare.

One of the BIG REASONS for Dell's decline and customer disgust and abandonment is because DELL was among the first and most notorious PC companies to outsource their 'American customer' tech support to places like Asia.
 
Is it just me, or people around here stopped thinking?

What sort of an argument is that? It's like saying, "Try parking an SUV on a bike parking rack", implying that because SUV's can't be parked on such small spaces, they're therefore worthless.

SUV serves a purpose. You cannot carry 5 passengers with a bike. But you can fit a workstation into a portable computer, like Apple did. So the analogy is false. If it's possible to make it smaller, do it. And before you jump in and say that the new Mac Pro's small form factor is a big compromise, I disagree. Everything I need is in the new Mac Pro. The rest I wasn't using in the old one anyway. And it seems many people were in the same wagon.

----------

LOL, you actually took a Mac Pro on flights?! My god... just get a decent laptop.. . All the MacBook Pros with a Sandybridge processor or better are more than capable.

Yes, today a rMBP is faster than a 6 year old Mac Pro. But in 2008, a MBP was 20% as fast as my MP. So no way I'm gonna use that laptop for months if I have to temporarily move.
 
apple is doing everything right it seems.
even friends of mine did buy imacs lately, even though they dont do anything else than browsing the web with it.

waste of money if you ask me, but if it makes them happy....it sure makes apple happy

Apple is doing this right (for the most part), but coupled with the fact that Microsoft is doing every thing wrong, makes for an easy victory.

Your friends probably bought iMacs after trying to use that TURD Windows 8 that Microsoft released. If that doesn't drive someone to switch OSs, nothing will.
 
While I can be frustrated that Apple did away with an excellent, high-powered, workstation by "trash canning" the previous G5/Mac Pro chassis, I can't disagree with your assessment. Nevertheless, there are a lot "pros" using the current Pro, with internal storage, for things other than video capture and editing, and who have no need for 12-cores etc.

I consoled myself by purchasing more Apple stock with the money I would have spent on a new Mac Pro, and I'm spec'ing out a reasonably nice hackintosh system. Here's hoping the new Mac Pro is wildly successful. (go go AAPL stock price!)

Ok, so you chose not to buy a product and paid into illegally ripping off Apple's IP...then invested in Apple. You are probably the stupidest investor I've ever seen. Go invest in Pepsi then drink Coke products all day.
 
Reverse quote

It would be cool if Tim Cook would step up and say, "If I were in charge of Dell, I'd sell everything and close my doors". :)
 
Try taking the current/old Mac pro on a plane.

OpoQQ.jpg
 
At first when I saw that picture my thought was "what the heck is that black thing?" Then took a few seconds for me to remember it was the new Mac Pro heh.
 
Glad to see people are seeing the worth in buying a nice computer. Even if they're just going to just surf the web, at least they won't get viruses or crap crappy crappiness hahaha .
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.