Apple built that house specifically for their roaches. They don't have a heartfelt commitment to journalism, journalists, or journalistic integrity. That's not where they came from. Apple simply spotted a market where they could slightly differentiate by claiming some superior sensibility in curation. But that's bogus. The market holds sway.Apple News wouldn't be so bad if Apple didn't infest it with ads.
Actually, I rather enjoy making my rounds of all the screamsheets of an evening. For grocery lines and breaks in the loo, I browse FlipBoard with the READER view button mashed down. I pay for Time Magazine and the Wall Street Journal as polar opposites. And 911 & Porsche World and GT Porsche.
I never thought Apple's price was worth their content, separate or bundled, only partly because I live at my horse farm 3-4 days a week. The net don't inter, out where the buses don't run. Most raw copy is always available somewhere for free with an ad or two zillion.