Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
my 65" LG OLED tv was $2000 and my surround sound setup is $1500. Granted I wish I didn't invest so much In those things now since I watch all my movies on the Vision Pro but its not all that crazy considering the theater size screen

Well um... I paid similar prices and I'm happy that I did...because my family all takes advantage of that entertainment system, altogether and individually. Not something a Vision Pro can replicate. If I were a sad sack living alone with that much money to burn I wouldn't be buying expensive entertainment systems to begin with.
 
How any of what is justified? My own personal justification for it?

It was widely reported early on that Apple was constrained by supply of screens, and that they'd only be building +/- 400,000 units in 2024. Again, nothing in this report is some new data that is supporting the theory you had from the beginning.

Nor do I conclude what you concluded about the shifting of focus to a lower-end model to be released next.

If you don't need it or want it, that says nothing about the product itself.

Production constraints leading to lower sales would suggest that Apple can’t keep them on shelves. But you can walk into an Apple Store anywhere and walk out with one, so that clearly is not the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
“Reporting out of Apple” - has Apple shared any numbers? Or do you mean the rumor mill?

Rumors have sources. Some more reliable than others. This is basic media literacy we’re talking about. Dismissing any negative as “nothing but rumor” is a facile way to redirect the discussion but it doesn’t negate the fact that the most reliable reporting available strongly suggests that the product is not a success in any significant way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Friendly reminder... this is the sales arc of the iPod:

The iPod was instantly desirable to anyone who had exposure to it
Absolutely zero useful to glean there in a comparison with the AVP

The only reason iPods didn't take off even quicker is that music downloading and purchasing was still becoming a "thing" and also the initial ones (& iTunes) were Mac only (which was just a twinkle in mainstream eyes at that particular point in history)

The AVP is standalone, available easily ... and basically nobody wants it
 
Apple knows this is a niche product. Apple priced it at a Pro level, and knew that, despite so many of you trying to claim that if this doesn't sell like the iPhone it's a failure, this was an entirely new product line, and that it would take time to develop.

I'm confident Apple has a long-term view of this product.

You ignored the point I made.
 
I like mine. I use mine. It fills an important role in work.

I simply don't understand, have never understood, the feverish passion that so many of you have toward this product. It makes me giggle to see how desperately you jump into every thread about the AVP to talk smack about it. Seriously, get a hobby. :)

Let’s not make it a referendum on personalities. That isn’t what’s happening.
 
No, I didn't. The point is that Apple never expected this version of this product to fly off the shelves in the manner that products like the iPhone or the iPod have. Not yet. So trying to score a point about it not being sold out everywhere makes zero sense. The Mac Studio is not sold out. Does that mean it's a failure?

You claimed that the bottleneck was production constraints. That isn’t accurate. They’re able to make more than enough to satisfy the weak demand for it. The MacStudio isn’t a relevant comparison. The Studio isn’t a new product class. It’s a Mac.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Rumors have sources. Some more reliable than others. This is basic media literacy we’re talking about. Dismissing any negative as “nothing but rumor” is a facile way to redirect the discussion but it doesn’t negate the fact that the most reliable reporting available strongly suggests that the product is not a success in any significant way.
Look at the below “rumor”, and there were other stories at the end of Jan after the launch that Apple has already sold 180-200k.
Media needs clicks, people here like to discuss whatever the media feeds them, and that’s fine, after all the is an Apple rumors site.

 
Bringing up the iPod is absolutely hilarious, as it's such an inaccurate comparison to make
I remember being at a party with one of the very first iPods and it was literally a "chick magnet"

You couldn't get the girls away from it.
They LOVED it...
It was an absolute "dance party creator"

The AVP couldn't be further from that description
 
That’s what’s called a “cherry pick” in debate.
That was an early rumor, and yet you don’t want to use that as a datapoint, whatever, keep on bashing the VPro, that’s fine.
You as others are all entitled to your opinions and that’s all there is
 
Bringing up the iPod is absolutely hilarious, as it's such an inaccurate comparison to make
I remember being at a party with one of the very first iPods and it was literally a "chick magnet"

You couldn't get the girls away from it.
They LOVED it...
It was an absolute "dance party creator"

The AVP couldn't be further from that description

I was the only person I knew who owned a gen 1 iPod. Your description is accurate. It spent more time in the hands of my friends than it did mine. That’s how interested in it people were.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
That was an early rumor, and yet you don’t want to use that as a datapoint, whatever, keep on bashing the VPro, that’s fine.
You as others are all entitled to your opinions and that’s all there is

I’m not excluding any specific data points. I’m evaluating based on an assessment of the overall reporting available.
 
Literally, there are no successful AR/VR devices for consumers and even Meta considered as not successful as people did not use it continuously. The purpose of Apple Vision Pro is already limited without doubts which cant be improved.

It would be better to advertise as professional or B2B device but then AVP was never meant for that.
 
I'm afraid that to start the "killer app" would need to be a really great game. I know Apple doesn't want to pigeon hole the device too far into entertainment but they have to start somewhere.

The tech inside the Vision Pro would truly make for a mind blowing game in VR that could set a new standard and create buzz. The problem is, Apple needs to front the entire cost. Perhaps they are doing that and we don't know it--but just a few experiences like that would motivate me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.