You'd think people would learn before dismissing an new Apple product out of hand.. We heard similar comments expressed with the original iPhone, the iPad and the latest iPhone 6/6+.
I'm not saying it's going to be a runaway success but until we get to use it ourselves and developers have had a chance to get hands on and develop native apps, we can't say one way or the other wether it'll be a success. Many peoples original reaction to the iPad was 'it's a big iPod Touch'. I remember many people at work saying the same thing when I showed them my iPad but within a year all of them had bought one.
What we can do, and many are doing, is expressing an opinion based on what Apple have shown us already and, admittedly, they did a rather poor job of it at the keynote.
Roll on April I say. Just hope we get it in the UK shortly after.
You base a lot of your comments on what you THINK the Apple Watch is going to do and how it's going to do it.
Perhaps Apple's mistake here was announcing this thing before the software was ready. They've left the door wide open for haters and skeptics to declare it a failure.
When they unveiled the iPhone and iPad, we didn't just get a video of a few features. We got Steve Jobs using one in real time. Yes, we've all found after the fact that the iPhone demo was pure smoke and mirrors because the software wasn't anywhere near ready, but still. Or think about the iPad--the first thing Steve Jobs did was sit down on a couch, put the iPad in his lap, and start browsing the web.
I understand that Apple wanted to show this thing off before the press started leaking parts and also so that developers could start trying to make apps for it, but not showing the watch in action on stage left the door wide open for people to draw their own conclusions. This needs to change on their next product launch.
When they unveiled the iPhone and iPad, we didn't just get a video of a few features. We got Steve Jobs using one in real time. Yes, we've all found after the fact that the iPhone demo was pure smoke and mirrors because the software wasn't anywhere near ready, but still. Or think about the iPad--the first thing Steve Jobs did was sit down on a couch, put the iPad in his lap, and start browsing the web.
I understand that Apple wanted to show this thing off before the press started leaking parts and also so that developers could start trying to make apps for it, but not showing the watch in action on stage left the door wide open for people to draw their own conclusions. This needs to change on their next product launch.
We did see the watch in action on the stage. Kevin Lynch did a rather long demo of the software. Yes, he didn't go into lots of detail but we did see it in action and the press got to handle them after the keynote and see them in action.
We did see the watch in action on the stage. Kevin Lynch did a rather long demo of the software. Yes, he didn't go into lots of detail but we did see it in action and the press got to handle them after the keynote and see them in action.
That whole presentation was very problematic. Ben Thompson of Stratechery is one of my favorite tech industry analysts - who recently wrote a nice post about why people keep messing up when predicting Apple's supposed "doom" (spoiler: he loves Apple and thinks they're rocking it) - wrote a GREAT breakdown of what went wrong with the Apple Watch introduction.
Just nailed it, I thought:
Then came the introductory video, and we never got an explanation of why the Apple Watch existed, or what need it is supposed to fill. What is the market? Why does Apple believe it can succeed there? What makes the Apple Watch unique?
The problem is that the Smart Watch needs that explanation: what exactly is the point?
To be clear, the hardware looks amazing, and I love the Digital Crown. Its one of those innovations that seems so blindingly obvious in retrospect, and Cook was spot on when he noted that you cant just shrink a smartphone UI to the wrist. But that was exactly the problem with too many of the software demos: there were multiple examples of activities that simply make no sense on the wrist.
The press did NOT get to do that. They did not have working software on them at the time, and a 10 minute on stage demo is not what I was referring to in reference to the long detailed iPhone/iPad demos we got.
Don't get me wrong--I have my money ready for an Apple Watch. I have no doubt it's going to be compelling. I just think they dropped the ball a bit on the reveal and left it too open to the hate mob that already comes out in droves every day WITHOUT them announcing new products.
Maybe I'm alone here but I haven't worn a watch since I was a child, and I don't plan on spending $350 for a new watch when my iPhone can tell the time, check my mail and do pretty much anything I need when I'm mobile.
The one in the coffee shop looks incredibly huge on the guys wrist. I really can't see tons of people flocking to them or at least not the larger of the 2.
Bully for you. I'm not in the market for an Apple Watch, but I much prefer wearing something on my wrist to fishing about in a pocket or a bag every time I just want to glance at the time.Maybe I'm alone here but I haven't worn a watch since I was a child, and I don't plan on spending $350 for a new watch when my iPhone can tell the time, check my mail and do pretty much anything I need when I'm mobile.
But it can't. No gps unless you also carry your phone, and if you have your phone, why do you need a watch too?
Lack of integrated gps is the killer for me, and I will consider an Apple watch when they add it.
That whole presentation was very problematic. Ben Thompson of Stratechery is one of my favorite tech industry analysts - who recently wrote a nice post about why people keep messing up when predicting Apple's supposed "doom" (spoiler: he loves Apple and thinks they're rocking it) - wrote a GREAT breakdown of what went wrong with the Apple Watch introduction by comparing it to the product introductions Apple did for the iPod, iPhone, and iPad.
Just nailed it, I thought:
Then came the introductory video, and we never got an explanation of why the Apple Watch existed, or what need it is supposed to fill. What is the market? Why does Apple believe it can succeed there? What makes the Apple Watch unique?
The problem is that the Smart Watch needs that explanation: what exactly is the point?
To be clear, the hardware looks amazing, and I love the Digital Crown. Its one of those innovations that seems so blindingly obvious in retrospect, and Cook was spot on when he noted that you cant just shrink a smartphone UI to the wrist. But that was exactly the problem with too many of the software demos: there were multiple examples of activities that simply make no sense on the wrist.
Apple knows what they're doing. This will be good, I can't wait.
Cook needed to set it up with the why. Even if the why is simply convenience. I think they had a perfect opportunity tying it in with the larger phones so I was a bit surprised they didn't. But I suspect there are a few things Apple hasn't disclosed yet that they're saving for a launch event. And I wouldn't be surprised if a launch event features some high profile developers showing off their apps. If Apple can show healthy developer support I think that will drive sales.
What developers do with this is really make or break for the device. The demos they showed weren't very exciting. I don't want to look at 1-inch versions of my photos or browse movie showtimes with it.
You base a lot of your comments on what you THINK the Apple Watch is going to do and how it's going to do it.
Perhaps Apple's mistake here was announcing this thing before the software was ready.
...and forum troll really don't understand how Apple operates.
What developers do with this is really make or break for the device. The demos they showed weren't very exciting. I don't want to look at 1-inch versions of my photos or browse movie showtimes with it.