Anyone remember Staingate? Apple apologists here were saying it was the user's fault for cleaning the screen wrong. It took Apple years to acknowledge the issue but the community backslash won in the end, and repair program was launched.
What about Error 53? Apple apologists were claiming bricked iphones were ok because of security, mass outrage ensued, community spoke up, Apple came out with update to remove bricking.
Throtlegate - mass outrage on this, Apple apologists said nonissue, mass outrage ensued, Apple launched discounted replacements but most importantly gave users health monitoring which they were purposefully banning before and a way to bypass the throttling.
MBP 2016 Keyboard failure - Apple apologists were dismissing issue saying it's isolated and not as widespread. The reports kept building up, Apple launched repair program.
The list goes on and on, here's what I've learned:
1. When a thread on Macrumors doesn't die, and posts keep building and building, usually it escalates and permeates into social media, and other news outlets pick up the story, and we get a response from Apple. It works almost every single time. Unfortunately Apple usually responds after mass outrage, that's how they operate, that's why criticism and "noise" is necessary. No "noise" = no reply from Apple, issue is hidden under the rug, that's a fact.
2. A lot of the "noise" is because when a legitimate issue arises, there is a group of people coming out with excuses to defend the indefensible, this adds outrage to those of us that see an issue that needs to be addressed and not hid under the rug like Apple usually tries to do.
Best post in this entire thread to explain the situation.