Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Neither has the marketing department.

Marketing: We have this great selling point, its called mag safe and stops accidents.
Design team: Nah, we have to go thinner - lets get rid of magsafe.
Marketing: ok how about a replaceable battery like we did years ago?
Design team: Nah, we have to go thinner, lets glue that mother f. in.
Marketing: ok, how about letting people put in bigger storage, more ram we could say the macbook is configurable.
Design team: Nah, we have to go thinner, lets solder the buggers on to the motherboard. Then every fix is the same - replace just one component - the motherboard, then it doesn't take a genius to work out whats gone wrong. So we can slim down the genius team.
Marketing: You design guys are f*!k&@g everything up, I have an idea, since you ain't putting out things we can market, lets slim your team down.
I'm sure this was meant to be "tongue in cheek", but I sometimes wonder if this is a synopsis of what really goes on - how much money do Ive and his 24 member "team" make, and what do they really do to justify their salaries? Someone comes up with ideas to remove phone jacks, glue in parts, get rid of replaceable batteries, alter keyboards, make flimsy display cables, skimp on cooling, etc. Do these 24 people come up with this stuff? If not, then what do they really do? In any case, I'd say the marketing folks lately have been the most successful segment in the company - Apple is still selling lots of stuff, despite the flaws and high prices. I'd say engineering has suffered in being forced to cut corners and make compromises in order to comply with increasingly thin form decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dilbert99
It's usually a good thing when people who have been doing the same thing for 10s of years move on. Good for them, and the company. New blood, new ideas. Rock on.
 
Honestly they are probably bored out of their mind.

Everything has had pretty much the same design for many years, aside from making some bezels smaller and displays rounded on the corners for a few products. Even Apple’s best new product in years—the AirPods—are essentially EarPods with the cords snipped off. Apple used to update the iPhone design every two years, but now it’s every three. The HomePod is the big new product and it’s just a rounded cylinder that isn’t even selling that well.

That hideous square camera bump on the back of the next iPhone may have been the straw that broke their back.
Everyone knows (clearly not) , who is saying the next iPhone camera bump is what drove them out, that the said bump design probably started at least a year ago right? Do any of you understand the design process takes years , especially in apples case? So just because your precious little eyes just now saw the leaked “design” in an article doesn’t mean it’s anything new that pushed these guys “over the edge” to leave.

I’m gonna throw this insane, crazy, off the rocker, mental patient theory out there.....ready?
Maybe they are seasoned vets in the industry, have countless millions and just want to enjoy life? Do any of you trolls think that is even the slightest possibility here? Everyone retires eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I'm sure this was meant to be "tongue in cheek", but I sometimes wonder if this is a synopsis of what really goes on - how much money do Ive and his 24 member "team" make, and what do they really do to justify their salaries? Someone comes up with ideas to remove phone jacks, glue in parts, get rid of replaceable batteries, alter keyboards, make flimsy display cables, skimp on cooling, etc. Do these 24 people come up with this stuff? If not, then what do they really do? In any case, I'd say the marketing folks lately have been the most successful segment in the company - Apple is still selling lots of stuff, despite the flaws and high prices. I'd say engineering has suffered in being forced to cut corners and make compromises in order to comply with increasingly thin form decisions.
This line of thought goes along with what I said here and makes is sound like anyone picked off the street could walk in and do a better job.

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-three-employees.2179211/page-7#post-27315200
 
Yes working for the man who created products responsible for revolutionizing entire industries or creating new ones while being the envy of many other companies is SUCH a stain. Keep on trolling.

I agree with him, though less dramatically. The race for the skinniest laptop that sacrifices expandability, and now reliability, is a problem. And that's directly Ive's fault. I'll take a 2015 MBP with modern specs, that doesn't require a pricey keyboard replacement in a year.
 
Everyone knows (clearly not) , who is saying the next iPhone camera bump is what drove them out, that the said bump design probably started at least a year ago right? Do any of you understand the design process takes years , especially in apples case? So just because your precious little eyes just now saw the leaked “design” in an article doesn’t mean it’s anything new that pushed these guys “over the edge” to leave.

I’m gonna throw this insane, crazy, off the rocker, mental patient theory out there.....ready?
Maybe they are seasoned vets in the industry, have countless millions and just want to enjoy life? Do any of you trolls think that is even the slightest possibility here? Everyone retires eventually.
Be careful with a rational line of thought. It's way to simple a proposition to assume there may be some flavor of having enough money and retiring to enjoy life. But no:
- removing a headphone jack can be done by a monkey
- no design experience needed to design a camera hump
- good designs can be done by even the most inexperienced get quantity and forego the quality
- they must be bored recycling the same designs year after year
etc. Extreme cognitive dissonance at work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: curtvaughan
For what? Apple's version of the Galaxy Fold debacle? Or perhaps "innovations" like the MS Kin?
No, for having zero innovations in the past 6 years.
Only thing they had was the watch.
The rest is just bringing features to existing products.

Apple sadly has become a seller of disposable appliances.

Apple. Yesterday's technology
At tomorrow's prices
 
  • Like
Reactions: B4U
Good riddance to these people. Glad their names are published. Name and shame them.

This is not an elementary school recess, no need to name and shame them. Not everything works like the toxic world of US politics that teaches people to just blame and shame others.
 
No, for having zero innovations in the past 6 years.
Only thing they had was the watch.
The rest is just bringing features to existing products.

Apple sadly has become a seller of disposable appliances.

Apple. Yesterday's technology
At tomorrow's prices
Again, we see a personal moving definition of innovation at play. While you are entitled to your opinion, the universe happily doesn't agree with it.
 
Ah, you beat me to it. Immediately on reading the article, I wanted to vent my frustration at this pathetic "form ahead of function", that robs us of good keyboards, and stops them giving matte anti-glare screens to those that need them.

Good riddance to these people. Glad their names are published. Name and shame them.

Isn't that a bit harsh?

We don't really know what happened here...what if they were the only brave dissenters that tried to rage against the thin machine unsuccessfully until they "decided to retire"?

If that's the case they're fallen heroes and should be celebrated.
 
What are you expecting them to ‘design’ that would be totally different? The Apple Watch, the AirPods and the HomePod are all recent designs, do those count? I’d say they do.

apple watch - slight modification
AirPods - slight modification
home pod - ok got me there
iMac - hasn't had a new design in how long?
Imac pro - no real design change from the imac but darker gray
Macbook / MacBook pro / MacBook air - slight design changes - added a touch bar on pro
mac pro -?????
iPads - added more to the line up with slight modifications
apple tv - same
iPhone - 3 cameras and probably upgraded internals....added a full size screen a while back,

nothing ground breaking in the design arena...
 
  • Like
Reactions: B4U
apple watch - slight modification
AirPods - slight modification
home pod - ok got me there
iMac - hasn't had a new design in how long?
Imac pro - no real design change from the imac but darker gray
Macbook / MacBook pro / MacBook air - slight design changes - added a touch bar on pro
mac pro -?????
iPads - added more to the line up with slight modifications
apple tv - same
iPhone - 3 cameras and probably upgraded internals....added a full size screen a while back,

nothing ground breaking in the design arena...
Using the above criteria, there isn't anything groundbreaking in the design arena for the competition either. Only iterative improvements.
 
I'm sure this was meant to be "tongue in cheek", but I sometimes wonder if this is a synopsis of what really goes on - how much money do Ive and his 24 member "team" make, and what do they really do to justify their salaries? Someone comes up with ideas to remove phone jacks, glue in parts, get rid of replaceable batteries, alter keyboards, make flimsy display cables, skimp on cooling, etc. Do these 24 people come up with this stuff? If not, then what do they really do? In any case, I'd say the marketing folks lately have been the most successful segment in the company - Apple is still selling lots of stuff, despite the flaws and high prices. I'd say engineering has suffered in being forced to cut corners and make compromises in order to comply with increasingly thin form decisions.

I agree 100%. I believe these decisions come from the top down. The design team then has to figure out how to make it work.

Tim, being the profit man, says:

"Remove everything we can get away with, solder everything in, but make it thin and blame it on sexyness and simplicity. That way, even if prices remain the same, our profit margin goes up given we're using less aluminum, less components, less manufacturing, less engineering and simpler repairs.

However, we open a new revenue stream because we force those who want more power to pay whatever WE decide for upgrades, offer those that want more connectivity to buy our dongles, offer those that want to listen to music to buy our headphones, or set up those who realized that they didn't get enough power or flexibility upfront to come back and buy our machines more frequently or a more expensive machine that has the missing feature they need".

For the last 8 years Apple has figured out that they can successfully turn the Mac into an iPad hardware-wise by gluing them shut, and people still buy them, because Apple KNOWS they still have THE golden goose: MacOS.

That thing is like crack-cocaine. Once you're hooked, you'll want it forever, even after you kick the habit.

I hate myself for it, but I'm saving up already for when my 2011/2012 machines finally die (they're on the way there already). :)
 
Design isn't putting lipstick on a pig.

However, it also requires a realistic attitude, since current technology might not be able to do what your design needs to work. You work with what you have and aim for the future.

That said, the only really new hardware designs Apple has pumped out in recent memory are AirPods and the HomePod. They do know how to pump out apple watch bands, though. Those have gone through more refreshes than any other Apple product in history.

I disagree. The product category that grew the most is adaptors and dongles... ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: B4U
Everyone knows (clearly not) , who is saying the next iPhone camera bump is what drove them out, that the said bump design probably started at least a year ago right? Do any of you understand the design process takes years , especially in apples case? So just because your precious little eyes just now saw the leaked “design” in an article doesn’t mean it’s anything new that pushed these guys “over the edge” to leave.

I’m gonna throw this insane, crazy, off the rocker, mental patient theory out there.....ready?
Maybe they are seasoned vets in the industry, have countless millions and just want to enjoy life? Do any of you trolls think that is even the slightest possibility here? Everyone retires eventually.
Jokes bro. Jokes. Chill.
 
You mean he's the one responsible for everything being so slim it can't have a decent battery, can't have decent functionality, and has to be under-clocked to avoid overheating?

Apple industrial design has been total crap since Jobs died. The best designed Apple products ever made in terms of looks and function were in 2011 and 2012. It's all been downhill since then. The best thing Steve Jobs ever did was control and direct Ives.

Ive's the genius who keeps pulling out features to leave empty space behind? (the optical drive in the mac mini, the headphone jack in the iPhone). And maybe getting rid of the optical drive was the right choice, but to leave the device the same form factor with a huge empty cavity where the drive belongs is overachieving levels of idiocy.

All the next guy has to do is make every product 10% thicker and fill the volume with more battery and he'll be 10 times the designer Ive is.

Getting rid of the optical drive was a management decision, not a "Jony Ive wants it thinner, so it must be" decision. The march to get rid of optical drives started with the release of the MacBook Air in 2008 and just kept marching on until it was completed with the release of the new Mac Pro in Late 2013. It was one less expense, one less moving part and one less design constraint. Steve was just as obsessed with thin as Jony. He beamed when he introduced the MacBook Air and pulled it out of that manilla folder. To Steve, optical drives were an impediment to a wireless future where iTunes Store had already become the dominant medium for music sales and consumption by 2008.

The headphone jack argument will never be resolved, which indicates that Apple neither made a good decision or a bad decision, they simply made A decision knowing that some would be fine with it and other would not be. It is what it is.

Remember, it was Steve Jobs who gave Ive that much control inside of Apple before he died. Source: https://appleinsider.com/articles/1...gner_jony_ive_more_power_than_anyone_at_apple
 
Again, we see a personal moving definition of innovation at play. While you are entitled to your opinion, the universe happily doesn't agree with it.

And since when are you the universe, or speak on behalf of it?
Innovation, when they release new iMacs with 5400rpm drives? Yeah really.
Keep wearing your dark glasses.
Your arrogance clearly shows that you sound more like an Apple employee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B4U
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.