Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not a whole heap of people were using smart phones when the iPhone came along. Apple saw a developing market and dominated it.
Wearable tech will apparently be a big market. I think the iwatch could be the start of a range of new products in this category for apple, and they want to start right.

Actually millions had been using smartphones for quite some time before the iPhone, in Europe at least.
 
Just what I want. A watch that looks like it belongs to a nerd. Make a smart watch that looks like a real watch and they will sell millions.

Image

Wear as many Rolexes as you want - you are still reading and posting on an apple fan site about rumored tech that company may release.

----------

So were iPad 1 and 2 unfinished products?

Not to mention every mac they ever built - they keep bringing out newer, more finished ones.
 
No. Retina technology and retina quality screens were the standard at the time of the mini's launch.

The standard on devices that had high resolution displays. The mini, like the imac, was not one of those devices.
 
Please be waterproof.

----------

Not sure what's worse, the pretentious declaring themselves superior in those devices, or the people who aspire to be that vacuous and shallow by defending such an utterly offensive position in life.

I'll take the "vacuous" side. What's so offensive about wearing watches that don't have a nerd level of 9001? Still, no way they're going to put a touch screen on a nice watch like that. It just wouldn't work.

Oh well, sorry you're jealous of someone's watch.
 
Just what I want. A watch that looks like it belongs to a nerd. Make a smart watch that looks like a real watch and they will sell millions.

Image

I can't see that thing having a touch screen. The square-ish design is better suited and will probably appeal to more people as a general utility watch. Use the Rolex when you want to look nice.

----------

They're not going to put a retina display on something as small as a watch screen. Sorry to disappoint you.

Why not? It would be easier than putting it on an iPhone.
 
I can't see that thing having a touch screen. The square-ish design is better suited and will probably appeal to more people as a general utility watch. Use the Rolex when you want to look nice.

Maybe it will come with a stylus the stores in the band. :D
 
No, I mean pretentious, and now simply offensive, but that's the whole point of that watch, to promote oneself to (self-declared) superiority in wrist-worn jewellery.

Ok… kinda like nice clothes and nice cars. Sorry that we don't like to drive Priuses to work, wearing clothes from the 99 Cents Store and covering our faces in shame. Maybe in Saudi Arabia, minus the Priuses.

----------

Are you assuming the watch is only used for telling time? No biometrics?

Of all things, biometrics? Still useless unless you have a heart problem or are doing some hardcore training.
 
It was expected of Apple to release the mini with a retina display.

By who? Just because some fans/analysts/people who are not apple expected it, means that by not dong it, they were not meeting the "standard" at the time?

Anyway, it was expected that they would do a retina imac too. But the tech wasnt there yet for mass market, and nor was it for the retina mini at the time of releasing, so they didnt. Some would say it still isnt there yet for the mini.
 
So who will be the first to realize a smart watch is essentially a new version of this?
PULSAR1.jpg
 
There is a name for all these issues that are "plaguing" Apple's iWatch. Its called product development. You know, the process you go thru when creating something new.

Sounds like endless other products I've heard about. Every new generation of CPU or DRAM jumps a number of hurdles like this. Sometimes the problems return after manufacturing has started.

I heard of one product that was failing several months after shipping. The agent sorted them out as either dead or "not dead yet". Quite the pessimist.
 
I'd be more impressed if Apple just released an analog watch that just had a tiny board on it that paired with your phone and used Siri to relay info to you. Digital displays are pretty tacky.
 
On second thought

I'd be more impressed if Apple just released an analog watch that just had a tiny board on it that paired with your phone and used Siri to relay info to you. Digital displays are pretty tacky.

I like your idea a lot, but then when you think it through, talking to Siri in public is socially awkward similar to talking on Bluetooth headset. Your idea works best in private, which will work for a lot of people. I love a beautiful analog watch and I have yet to see a digital watch that scream for affection.
 
So who will be the first to realize a smart watch is essentially a new version of this?
Image

The point is that it hopefully isn't. And if it is, let's hope it's at least a new version of the 80s Casio. Not as tacky as the one you showed.

e59d_calculator_watch.jpg
 
Last edited:
By pretentious you mean adult?

Haha so true. I don't wear watches for style (at least not right now), but no way I'm wearing my cheesy waterproof digital Casio watch when I want to look mature. It's a great watch with lots of features, but… gotta wear something nice.
 
hmmm I don't know if this is going to blow our minds, it seems
that this will be like apple tv when it launched, and apple would declare this as a "hobby". hope i'm wrong.
 
Can't wait to get my hands on a smart watch. It can go with the iPad I never use and the AppleTV I never use.

So psyched to have a limited version of an iPhone which I can only use with one hand.

Maybe you need someone to help you shopping since you seem to buy a lot of things even before you know how they could be useful to you.
An iPad you don't use? Come on...
And why are you posting this at all if you are really as uninterested as you claim to be?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.