I'm just really surprised to see the world's reaction to this. Yes, it's a contagious virus, it's pretty deadly
Thing is, it seems to be about as "deadly" as regular flu which kills half a million people (albeit mainly sick/elderly ones) a year worldwide, causes huge productivity losses due to sick days, places a huge seasonal load on health services etc. and is only partially mitigated by the availability of a vaccine. Yet not only do we not close schools and factories, cancel events or restrict travel to reduce the spread of flu, we're bombarded with irresponsible adverts for zombie pills that let you stagger into work for that important meeting and share your bugs with your colleagues... Meanwhile, the flu vaccination program is mainly targeted at vulnerable people only, whereas a mass vaccination program could hugely slow the spread of the disease and invoke herd immunity which also protects people who can't take the vaccine or for whom it isn't effective.
So, while taking proportionate measures to stop COVID-19 circulating as well as the regular flu - and stopping a double whammy on health service resources - is perfectly reasonable, it begs the questions of what is 'proportionate' and how do we justify taking such expensive (and risky) precautionary measures for C19 while being completely complacent about regular flu?
The answer is that regular flu has been there for a long, long time so our attitude is what it is, and we see it as an acceptable risk. COVID-19, however, is new, which is always scary, and that puts a lot of pressure on authorities and politicians to be seen to be doing something just in case C19 has a nasty surprise in store.
Also, individuals may need to understand that their personal risk from C19 is tiny, and if they do get it it will most likely be a mild annoyance like any other cold/flu bug, and that the precautions are really about protecting the minority of vulnerable people - a civilised thing to do, but not a justification for treating people from affected areas like lepers.
Of course, the media also needs to grow up and (for example) when a scientific advisor says that they are considering the effectiveness of cancelling large public gatherings, or that their worst-case scenario is 80% infection, not print headlines like "80% of people may get coronavirus!!! Football matches could be cancelled!!!!!" accompanied by pictures of people in hazmat suits, petri dishes with purple blobs, subway passengers wearing masks (with the fact that they don't help much buried away in a footnote) etc.
NB: when the dust has settled (and is being vacuumed up by people in bunny suits) it will be interesting to see what the figures are for regular flu what with everybody not wanting to travel and obsessively washing their hands... Maybe we should think twice about all these unnecessary international conferences and casual international travel - Greta would be pleased and even if you don't buy global warming, they're not making oil any more and it would be nice to leave some for the grandkids...