Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I had a couple of iMacs -- including the original Bondi Blue -- but it stopped making sense to me that I had to retire the monitor when I retired the machine. I'm now on a 2018-era mini, and switch my monitor (a Samsung 4K) back and forth between that and my gaming PC, which I couldn't do with a Mac.

I'm holding off moving to an M1 mini because (a) there are some open-source software packages I use that haven't made the leap yet and (b) I'm curious to see whether we hear anything substantial about the M1X this month.

There are reasons for the iMac, but they're not for everybody.
 
Please make 16GB RAM the minimum for the new iMac. Don't want an 8GB RAM version. Please don't charge an arm or leg for an upgrade to the 32GB RAM version!
I have a feeling that for unified memory 16Gb may have to be a used for a 6k display if it has to be used as a display frame buffer as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: TakeshimaIslands
Which is really pathetic, let's face it. I mean the anticipation and hype over a phone, or a computer.... People's lives (and dignity tanks) are really that empty?
Everyone needs a hobby. Mine is technology. Yours seems to be spending time on the wrong website. I would say my life is pretty full, and I think my dignity tank— whatever that is—is as well.
 
I thought the general consensus is that they can fit a "bezel-less" 32 inch panel in the same footprint of the 27 inch one, and a 24 inch panel in the footprint of the 21.5 inch version? These are the sizes I'm expecting to see anyways.
Here's hoping you're correct since my office set-up is constraint to the current 27" footprint.
 
Apparently not so since the 8GB M1 Mac mini can be used to drive the 6K Pro Display XDR.
Yes but what if the iMac user wants to add an additional Pro Display XDR? The standard M1 mini can use one 6k display plus a 4k display. If an M1 iMac has a built in 6k display then it's only going to allow an external 4k display to be added (not even a 5k?).

This to me suggests that M1X will be the dividing factor and I would wager that all those SKUs will come with 16Gb baseline RAM too. In other words, M1X will be driving 32" iMac while M1 will be left to the 24"...
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
The current 27" is about 30.5" diagonal measured from corner to corner including the chin. I then measured on the diagonal of the current screen and assuming a 32" screen with the same dimensions as ratio as the current screen, the width width of the screen would be about 3" wider than the 27" including the bezels. So adding narrow bezels the total width would probably be around 4" to 5" wider than the current 27". Given the chin, the height wouldn't need to change much. With an arm chip cooling should be less of an issue so I'd expect a 32" to be noticeably wider, but not hugely so. I think a 24" becomes much more desirable than the 21.5". For personal use I think I'd be happy with the 24".
If we're talking a 32 inch "bezel-less" screen it can't be 5 inches bigger diagonally and 4-5 inches wider than the 27 inch iMac. If the 27 inch iMac has a diagonal width of 30.5 inches with the bezel and chin, that would mean maybe 1.5-2 inches wider.
 
Last edited:
All good, but until all widespread apps are updated to work on apple silicon, any increase in performance will be negligeable.

I'm really really hoping betas for native versions of Illustrator and After Effects, by Adobe, will be available by this summer (during adobe max).
Photoshop has been released (and it's fast), Premiere Pro will be released very soon and Audition, inDesign, Media Encoder and Premiere Rush are available as betas for apple silicon.

Anyway for the updated M1 chip apple needs to take good care of the GPU side, the CPU performance of the M1 one are great as they are but so many programs are now GPU accelerated and the integrated graphics is just not enough (not considering the many glitches with external displays)...
As of today, it seems that the apple silicon GPU experience is still in beta, while the CPU one is pretty solid, assuming the support for rosetta 2 isn't dropped anytime soon.

I personally have a mac mini 16GB M1 since december, and only now that 75% of the apps I use have been made M1 native it feels like a smooth experience.
Apple really struck gold with this transition and I can't wait for all the macOS third party software to be made native...
Even "cheap" machines (like my mini) will run like a joy.

I cannot wait for an M1 native version of After Effects, as it is one of the apps that has the biggest potential for improvement, with the Apple Silicon Architecture.

With regards to my next mac, it'll be one of the rumoured macbook pros with the new designs, as I play to travel quite a bit once thid damn pandemic will be over...
 
This obsession with zero-bezels is a manufactured objective - like "megapixels" and "thinness".

Bezels are good. They separate your desktop from the background environment in your field of vision - reducing physical eyestrain and cognitive load.

Zero-bezel is like zero-depth "glass surface" keyboards. It might sound cool in the marketing department, and you can probably get a load of tech magazine/website editors excited by it .. but in reality it is a really bad idea.

Here's an illustration ....

Ev1MDXqXYAYle9y.jpeg
 
I am wondering why i woud choose this over a Mac Mini with a monitor of whatever size i choose?
Because it will have integrated into one package a really nice monitor, webcam, speakers and microphone — all of which you have to source and plug into that Mini.

I get the appeal of that modular approach, but for a lot of people it just makes more sense to buy a single all-in-one machine.
 
It doesn’t need to get physically wider. It would cause extreme fatigue to my eyes. I AR’ed the Pro XDR onto my desk and it looks huge. I wouldn’t like to have such a huge screen.

On the other side, a 24 inch would be too small for me. But I am only using the iMac 4 hours a day and I wouldn’t need such a powerhorse. So maybe a Mac Mini would do too. We’ll just wait and see.
 
I wonder if they might be going ultra-wide for the high end model? I think the height of anything lager than 27 makes it hard work on the neck for many. I certainly rather width over extra height having used an iMac Pro with external 27” LG 5K. The extra height of a 32” would be hard work I think.
Hard disagree. Height is useful for anyone who wants to work with text (or even web pages) without constantly scrolling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I don’t think the display will be the same size as the XDR — thinking at or just below 30 inches for the larger size.

Regardless, if the design comes out like renders and what’s in my head, this will be peak Mac design.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.