I have a feeling that for unified memory 16Gb may have to be a used for a 6k display if it has to be used as a display frame buffer as wellPlease make 16GB RAM the minimum for the new iMac. Don't want an 8GB RAM version. Please don't charge an arm or leg for an upgrade to the 32GB RAM version!
Everyone needs a hobby. Mine is technology. Yours seems to be spending time on the wrong website. I would say my life is pretty full, and I think my dignity tank— whatever that is—is as well.Which is really pathetic, let's face it. I mean the anticipation and hype over a phone, or a computer.... People's lives (and dignity tanks) are really that empty?
Apparently not so since the 8GB M1 Mac mini can be used to drive the 6K Pro Display XDR.I have a feeling that for unified memory 16Gb may have to be a used for a 6k display if it has to be used as a display frame buffer as well
Here's hoping you're correct since my office set-up is constraint to the current 27" footprint.I thought the general consensus is that they can fit a "bezel-less" 32 inch panel in the same footprint of the 27 inch one, and a 24 inch panel in the footprint of the 21.5 inch version? These are the sizes I'm expecting to see anyways.
Yes but what if the iMac user wants to add an additional Pro Display XDR? The standard M1 mini can use one 6k display plus a 4k display. If an M1 iMac has a built in 6k display then it's only going to allow an external 4k display to be added (not even a 5k?).Apparently not so since the 8GB M1 Mac mini can be used to drive the 6K Pro Display XDR.
It will support a processor of four times the power. It will include a great display as a great value.I am wondering why i would choose this over a Mac Mini with a monitor of whatever size i choose?
There's enough thermal headroom in a Mac mini to support some form of M1X chipset though. Will be interesting to see if Apple do that to replace the upper SKU which is still Intel for now.It will support a processor of four times the power. It will include a great display as a great value.
If we're talking a 32 inch "bezel-less" screen it can't be 5 inches bigger diagonally and 4-5 inches wider than the 27 inch iMac. If the 27 inch iMac has a diagonal width of 30.5 inches with the bezel and chin, that would mean maybe 1.5-2 inches wider.The current 27" is about 30.5" diagonal measured from corner to corner including the chin. I then measured on the diagonal of the current screen and assuming a 32" screen with the same dimensions as ratio as the current screen, the width width of the screen would be about 3" wider than the 27" including the bezels. So adding narrow bezels the total width would probably be around 4" to 5" wider than the current 27". Given the chin, the height wouldn't need to change much. With an arm chip cooling should be less of an issue so I'd expect a 32" to be noticeably wider, but not hugely so. I think a 24" becomes much more desirable than the 21.5". For personal use I think I'd be happy with the 24".
Because it will have integrated into one package a really nice monitor, webcam, speakers and microphone — all of which you have to source and plug into that Mini.I am wondering why i woud choose this over a Mac Mini with a monitor of whatever size i choose?
And yet here you are in this forum reading and commenting 🤔Which is really pathetic, let's face it. I mean the anticipation and hype over a phone, or a computer.... People's lives (and dignity tanks) are really that empty?
Hard disagree. Height is useful for anyone who wants to work with text (or even web pages) without constantly scrolling.I wonder if they might be going ultra-wide for the high end model? I think the height of anything lager than 27 makes it hard work on the neck for many. I certainly rather width over extra height having used an iMac Pro with external 27” LG 5K. The extra height of a 32” would be hard work I think.
Those hysterically positive comments are 100% genuine.Which is really pathetic, let's face it. I mean the anticipation and hype over a phone, or a computer.... People's lives (and dignity tanks) are really that empty?